Archive

Jenner Headlands Finalized to Open Space in Sonoma County

Wonderful news and long sought.

Thanks to our own Supervisor Reilly, the Land Trust and so many others we
have a treasure preserved for all time.

Now we have to go to work on protecting the rest, and connecting the
headlands east.

Congratulations to all of you who have worked so long and hard to make this
happen. Be sure to spread the good news.

Have a wonderful autumn week,
Rue

I am pleased to share this news with each of you — after more than four
years of negotiations, the agreement to purchase Jenner Headlands has
finally been completed, and was announced today during a media event at the
site.

We expect to see news coverage of the announcement on Channel 7 [KGO-TV]
during the 6 p.m. newscast tonight, and on the front page of the Friday
Press Democrat. The attached news release also has been distributed to other
media.

Supervisor Mike Reilly set the tone for the day when he told the reporters
that this agreement is perhaps “the most significant purchase in the history
of Sonoma County.” Certainly you will agree that today’s event is a
significant milestone in the District’s history.

Thank you, all, for your continued support of the District.

Sincerely,

Andrea

Andrea Mackenzie
General Manager
Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District
(707) 565-7360
www.sonomaopenspace.org
Permanently protecting the diverse agricultural, natural resource,
and scenic open space lands of Sonoma County for future generations

Important Dates Related to Russian River

Hi everyone!

I have one update, one correction, and one clarification to make to this list (below).

1. Santa Rosa Storage Oct. 16th meeting will take place in City Council Chambers at 5 PM. (update regarding time)

2. The Community Meeting in Guerneville on the Biological Opinion is on Thursday, Nov. 6th (NOT Nov. 13th)……(correction)

3. The meeting on Nov. 5th at Villa Chanticleer is of course in Healdsburg (clarification)

Please note these in your calendars.

Brenda

Hi everyone:
We not only have the election to track, but there’s a number of important water/wastewater meetings and deadlines coming up.  I thought it might be helpful if I list them.  This list is not necessarily complete.  PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD TO THIS LIST AND RECIRCULATE.

Brenda

SANTA ROSA WASTEWATER BPU:  RIVER DISCHARGE:  (3 meetings) Study session on project selection for river discharge:  Nov. 6, 2008

1: 30 PM City Council Chambers 100 SR Ave.

Study Session on project selection for river discharge;  joint meeting with City Council to review study session results:  Nov. 18, 2008 in City Council Chambers (not sure of time/call city to check)

Project Selection/Approval:  Dec. 4, 2008 1:30 PM City Council Chambers *** This is VERY important meeting to decide river discharge option.  We hope a lot of people will plan to be there.

SR/ STORAGE EIR:
BPU considers EIR certification for Storage options on Oct. 16, 2008.  They will then put this on the shelf and not do any project selection until some indefinite time in the future

BIOLOGICAL OPINION:  4 COMMUNITY MEETINGS Wed. Nov. 5th:  Dry Creek Habitat Restoration:  Villa Chanticleer:  1248 N. Fitch Mt. Rd.  Open house 6:30 PM/ presentations start at 7 PM.

Thursday, Nov. 6th:  Flow Changes Guerneville Vets Hall, 1st and Church St.  Open house 6;30 PM/ presentations at 7 PM

Thursday, Nov. 13:  Flow changes Ukiah BOS Chambers 501 Low Gap Rd. (same times as above

Wednesday, Nov. 19th: Estuary adaptive management Jenner Community Hall 10432 Hwy. 1 (Park across from gas station and walk behind gas station and across foot bridge)  same time as others

NORTH COAST REGIONAL BOARD Oct. 21, 2008 Public Workshop 10 AM to 12 noon at 5550 Skylane Blvd. in SR.  They are seeking environmental information to be considered in Basin Plan Amendment on Dissolved Oxygen (Scoping document available on their website at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast)  Contact:  Alydda Mangelsdorf (707) 576-6735

Also:  comments are due on stormwater permit for County and Santa Rosa by Oct. 22, 2008.  Document can be found on their website.  (Contact 576-2220 and ask for staff person on this item for more information

EEL-RUSSIAN RIVER COMMISSION Oct. 22, 2008 1:30 PM Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chambers 575 Administration Dr.  SR Main agenda item:  Proposed Eel/Russian River Trans-Basin Diversion Settlement (Anyone know what this is about?)  There is nothing on the agenda referring to the Biological Opinion

SONOMA COUNTY WATER COALTION Oct. 22, 2008 7 PM Sebastopol Vets Building Presentation on Dorothy Green’s book:  “Managing Water:  Avoiding Crisis in California”  Panel discussion after words on issues around irrigating with recycled water

LAGUNA FOUNDATION October 30, 2008:  Stakeholders Council 9 AM to 12 PM Santa Rosa’s Laguna Treatment Plant

WAC/TAC (Water Contractors regular meeting) Nov. 3, 2008 Combined WAC/TAC meeting 9 AM Laguna Treatment Plant

Hearings on Klamath Dams

Public Hearings on Dams’ Water Quality Begin!

October 20th-29th, 2008

For the last 4 years PacifiCorp’s Klamath dams have created one of the worst toxic algae problems ever recorded. This month, the State Water Board will decide if the dams get a clean water permit, or if they get removed. Help us fill these meetings with people speaking up for clean water and dam removal on the Klamath! For more info: http://www.klamathriver.org/Action-Alerts.html#hearings

Eureka, Ca - Oct. 20th, 1:30-3:30 pm
Klamath, Ca - Oct. 20th, 6-8 pm
Orleans, Ca - Oct. 21st, 12-2 pm
Yreka, Ca - Oct. 21st, 6-8 pm
Sacramento, Ca - Oct. 29th, 3-6 pm
>> For more meeting details: http://www.klamathriver.org/Action-Alerts.html#hearings

Ten Ways Dams Damage Rivers

Federal Energy Regulatory Commision Offers Downstream Fish Passage Options...

1. Dams reduce river levels

By diverting water for power, dams remove water needed for healthy in-stream ecosystems. Stretches below dams are often completely de-watered.

2. Dams block rivers

Dams prevent the flow of plants and nutrients, impede the migration of fish and other wildlife, and block recreational use. Fish passage structures can enable a percentage of fish to pass around a dam, but multiple dams along a river make safe travel unlikely.

3. Dams slow rivers

Many fish species, such as salmon, depend on steady flows to flush them downriver early in their life and guide them upstream years later to spawn. Stagnant reservoir pools disorient migrating fish and significantly increase the duration of their migration.

4. Dams alter water temperatures

By slowing water flow, most dams increase water temperatures. Other dams decrease temperatures by releasing cooled water from the reservoir bottom. Fish and other species are sensitive to these temperature irregularities, which often destroy native populations.

5. Dams alter timing of flows

By withholding and then releasing water to generate power for peak demand periods, dams cause downstream stretches to alternate between no water and powerful surges that erode soil and vegetation, and flood or strand wildlife. These irregular releases destroy natural seasonal flow variations that trigger natural growth and reproduction cycles in many species.

6. Dams fluctuate reservoir levels

Peaking power operations can cause dramatic changes in reservoir water levels — often up to 40 feet — which degrade shorelines and disturb fisheries, waterfowl, and bottom-dwelling organisms.

7. Dams decrease oxygen levels in reservoir waters

When oxygen-deprived water is released from behind the dam, it kills fish downstream.

8. Dams hold back silt, debris, and nutrients

By slowing flows, dams allow silt to collect on river bottoms and bury fish spawning habitat. Silt trapped above dams accumulates heavy metals and other pollutants. Gravel, logs and other debris are also trapped by dams, eliminating their use downstream as food and habitat.

9. Dam turbines hurt fish

Following currents downstream, fish can be injured or killed by turbines. When fish are trucked or barged around the dams, they experience increased stress and disease and decreased homing instincts.

10. Dams increase predator risk

Warm, murky reservoirs often favor predators of naturally occurring species. In addition, passage through fish ladders or turbines injure or stun fish, making them easy prey for flying predators like gulls and herons.

***

“When I visit a dam, I often find a plaque honoring by name the engineer, government leader, contracting firm and the height, size, date, volume of water held or diverted, power generated, flood capacity measurements. And that’s fine.

But I don’t find a plaque with the names of any species hurt, the names of any people displaced, the cost to taxpayers, the price of maintenance or decommissioning, or why this option was chosen over, say, windmills, solar panels, natural gas, groundwater pumping, demand management or some decentralized tools.”

— From a World Commission on Dams member

CA Water Board Slams Klamath Dam owner’s Application for Clean Water Permit

by Dan Bacher September 30th, 2008

State Regulators today announced a plan to evaluate the impacts of dam removal on the Klamath River, but not PacifiCorp’s own proposal for operation, according to a joint news release from the Karuk Tribe, Klamath Riverkeeper and the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations.

Dam removal is urgently needed as West Coast salmon populations are in their worst-crisis ever. Salmon fishing in ocean waters off Oregon and California and the Central Valley rivers is closed for the first time in history this year, due to the collapse of the Sacramento River fall chinook salmon run. However, commercial fishermen suffered from severe restrictions off the California and southern Oregon coast two years ago, due to the dramatic decline of Klamath River chinooks. We must restore the salmon runs of both the Klamath and Sacramento rivers so we don’t suffer from more fishery failures in the future.

KARUK TRIBE · KLAMATH RIVERKEEPER · PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMAN’S ASSOCIATIONS

P R E S S   R E L E A S E

CA Water Board Slams Klamath Dam owner’s Application for Clean Water Permit State Regulators announce plan to evaluate impacts of dam removal but not PacifiCorp’s own proposal for operation

Sacramento, CA - Today the California Water Resources Control Board released the Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report on Oregon based PacifiCorp’s proposed relicencing of Klamath River dams. The Water Board will not evaluate PacifiCorp’s own proposal for a status quo dam license which they describe as “not legally feasible” due to federal agencies’ mandatory prescriptions for fish ladders and other mitigation measures.

“PacifiCorp is playing the delay game by repeatedly withdrawing and then re-filing to same illegal plan,” commented Glen Spain of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), a major fishing industry group. “But every day they delay kills more fish, and this has got to stop. Dam removal is the only viable option, and until PacifiCorp gets serious about a dam removal plan we can support, this process must move forward toward dam removal with or without them.”

Instead of analyzing PacifiCorp’s proposal the Water Board plans to consider the following four alternatives: · FERC staff recommendations plus incorporation of the federal agencies mitigation measures including construction of fish ladders

  • Removal of Iron Gate and Copco 1 dams
  • Removal of Iron Gate, Copco 1, and Copco 2 dams
  • Long Term Modifications stemming for a potential settlement agreement among Klamath Basin stakeholders including PacifiCorp

Currently, Federal, California, and Oregon officials are negotiating an agreement to remove the dams with PacifiCorp, however, Tribes, fishermen, farmers, and environmental groups have been excluded from the talks.

“Without the participation of the people that live, work, and raise families here on the River, we have doubts that a meaningful agreement will emerge from these talks,” said Craig Tucker, spokesman for the Karuk Tribe. Tucker adds, “the Clean Water Permitting process is critically important. If the Water Board finds that PacifiCorp can’t meet California’s clean water standards with the dams in place, they can’t get the dams relicensed.”

The Federal Clean Water Act gives states the authority to regulate dam owners according to their own clean water standards. PacifiCorp’s Klamath dams create massive blooms of toxic blue-green algae that lead state and tribal agencies to post warnings against contacting the river and reservoirs each summer. Earlier this year, the Environmental Protection Agency listed the Klamath River as “impaired” by the toxic algae.

Economic reports from the California Energy Commission as well as FERC conclude that dam removal is actually cheaper for ratepayers than the construction of fish ladders and mandated increases in river flows. Even if the California Water Board issues a Clean Water Permit to PacifiCorp, it will most likely come with another set of mandatory mitigation measures which will drive the cost of relicensing up even more.

According to Klamath Riverkeeper’s Malena Marvin, “these dams are a money pit for rate payers and a death sentence for fish. It’s time for Warren Buffett to tell PacifiCorp to solve this problem by negotiating a dam removal agreement with the Tribes, fishermen, and farmers that live in the Klamath Basin. If he doesn’t he will go down in history as the man who brought poverty, disease, and toxic pollution to one of America’s greatest watersheds.”

For more information: Craig Tucker, Spokesman Karuk Tribe 916-207-8294 Glenn Spain, PCFFA, 541-689-2000 Malena Marvin, Klamath Riverkeeper 541-821-7260

RRWA Stormwater Training session–Wed., Oct. 15

FYI…this just sent to me - maybe already on your radar? - was not on mine! Definitely for the more techy-regulatory crowd. Maybe already to late to sign up?? Brock

“Christy Kennedy” CKennedy@rmcwater.com 10/1/2008 2:28 PM Hello,
The agenda for the RRWA Stormwater Training session on October 15, 2008 from 8:00am - 4pm in Santa Rosa is attached. Please note, registration will begin at 8:00am and the class starts at 8:25am. For now, we are planning on holding the class at the Santa Rosa Transit Training Room at 55 Stony Point Road. Due to the size of the class, we may need to move the training to another location in Santa Rosa. I will send out an email by the end of next week with the final location.

The training will focus on Construction Site Planning and Management for Water Quality and due to high demand, there will be a strong emphasis on Low Impact Development (RWQCB Region 1 perspective and examples from Contra Costa County). The training will consist of classroom and field time, slide presentations, and group exercises. Breakfast pastries, coffee, water and lunch will be provided by RRWA for the training.

There is no fee to attend the training. To sign up, please email me ckennedy@rmcwater.com or call (415-321-3400) by October 3rd (deadline extended) with your name, agency, email address and phone number. Thank you,

Thank you,
-Christy

Christy Kennedy, P.G., C.HG., P.E. Deputy Director, RRWA

RMC Water and Environment 222 Sutter Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, CA 94108 Phone: 415-321-3400 Fax: 415-321-3401 ckennedy@rmcwater.com www.rmcwater.com

Water Board Hearing on Dams Location Correction

Attached is a Notice of Correction for the Klamath NOP in Yreka, California scheduled for October 21, 2008.  The correction is the location of the meeting.

Thank you,
Jeanine Townsend
Clerk to the Board
State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street. 24th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 341-5600
Fax: (916) 341-5620

Yreka High School

Student Union

400 Preece Way

Yreka CA 96097

Santa Rosa’s IRWP update

Incremental Recycled Water Program (IRWP) Update
October 6, 2008

Information about the Seasonal Storage Project (SSP) and the availability of the Final EIR follows below.

The SSP Final EIR is available for review, today, October 6. Available online at www.SRCity.org/SeasonalStorage under Studies & Reports.

The Board of Public Utilities (BPU) meeting at which certification will be considered is being held at 5 PM* in the Santa Rosa Council Chamber, 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Santa Rosa.
(*Note meeting time change to 5 PM) Confirm agenda and schedule at http://www.SRCity.org/BPU.

Where you can find copies of the SSP FINAL EIR:
The Final SSP EIR (as well as the Discharge Compliance Project EIR) will be available for review at Sonoma County Branch Libraries in Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park/Cotati, Sebastopol, and Windsor and on the project Web site at www.SRCity.org/IRWP.

The Final EIRs, appendices and reference material cited in the Final EIRs will also be available for review at the Laguna Plant Library, located at 4300 Llano Road, Santa Rosa. Hard copies and CDs of the Final EIRs will be available for purchase by calling ARC at 707.579.9096.

If you have any questions please call 707.836.0300.

Mark Millan
Public Information Coordinator
www.SRCity.org/IRWP
707.836.0300

Russian River Biological Opinion Summary

Dear Friends:
The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has just released the final Endangered Species Act (ESA) Section 7 Russian River Biological Opinion, designed to help restore threatened and endangered species, Coho and Chinook salmon and Steelhead in the Russian River and its tributaries.

This massive document, the result of 10 years of discussion, studies, analysis, modeling and planning, based on existing conditions, sets the stage for a 15 year recovery plan, called the Russian River Instream Flow and Restoration Project (RRIFR), which is expected to cost some $100M to implement. The RRIFR includes operation of Coyote Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Warm Springs Dam (Lake Sonoma) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) on behalf of the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA) and the Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (Mendocino District).

Funding will likely come from a variety of sources, including ratepayers, state and federal grants, and existing tax revenues that can be designated for this purpose.

The Executive Summary, public meeting schedules, and full Russian River BO report are at: http://www.sonomacountywater.org/projects/

There are many reasons for the decline of these species, including historic overfishing, gravel mining, development near the river and its tributaries, increased sedimentation from logging and historic agricultural practices, and changing climate and ocean conditions. The reasons also include flood control and water supply projects in the river and in Dry Creek. The flood control and water supply projects are the sole focus of the biological opinion.

Essentially, the biological opinion addresses the following questions:
Do the flood control projects operated by the Corps and the water supply and flood control projects operated by SCWA threaten to jeopardize the continued existence of steelhead, coho, and Chinook? If the answer is yes, how can these projects or operations be changed to enable the survival and the recovery of the species?

The BO finds that some aspects of flood control and water supply operations threaten to jeopardize steelhead and Coho, but not Chinook.

1. High summertime flows in the Russian River and Dry Creek

2. The high velocity of water in Dry Creek in the summer

3. The current practice of “breaching” the sandbar at the estuary during the summer

To avoid further problems, some “reasonable and prudent alternatives” (RPA) are proposed, including following:

1. Reducing summertime flows in the river below existing flows mandated by the State Water Resources Control Board’s (SWRCB) D.1610

2. Restoring 6 miles of habitat in Dry Creek

3. Creating a freshwater lagoon in the estuary during the summer months

4. Carefully monitoring both habitat and fish in Dry Creek, the estuary, and the river

5. Eliminating impediments to fish spawning or improving habitat in several streams

6. Enhancing the existing coho broodstock program

At the public meeting held on Oct. 1, NMFS staff said that “success” for the RRIFR Project was not going to be measured over time by actual fish numbers, but by habitat improvements. “Our approach is a habitat one.” - Bill Hearn, NMFS. He also noted that the RRIFR efforts would not address other restoration projects in the watershed, nor would they address erosion, wastewater discharges, runoff, hillside conversions, other water users (legal or illegal) and “other non-project activities”.

The BO will clearly have an impact on future minimum flow requirements and revisions to D1610 by SWRCB, recreational water users in various reaches of the Russian River, and potentially on future water allocations to SCWA contractors.

One of the core questions to be answered remains: if summer and fall flows are reduced in the Russian River, will the remaining water be left in the Eel River? Or will ‘undesirable’ higher inflows from the Eel River merely be used to supplement and increase available water supplies for Russian River water users? Will the Eel River continue to be used to mask the ‘over-appropriations’ of the Russian River?

There will be a series of Community meetings: 11/5 Healdsburg; 11/6 Guerneville; 11/13 Ukiah; 11/19 Jenner. See dates and locations at: http://www.sonomacountywater.org/projects/documents/CommunityMeetingsonBiologicalOpinion_000.pdf

Biological opinion 4.33mg file: http://www.sonomacountywater.org/projects/documents/Signed-RussianRiverFinal_BO_9-24-08.pdf

David Keller

Russian River Flow Changes Ordered

National Marine Fisheries Service says amount of water must be cut in winter to help juvenile salmon

Dry Creek/Russian River Confluence

By BOB NORBERG
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT
Published: 9/30/08

Federal regulators have ordered Sonoma County to reduce the amount of water flowing down the Russian River and Dry Creek and to rebuild Dry Creek habitat to spur the recovery of steelhead and salmon.

The National Marine Fisheries Service also is ordering the Sonoma County Water Agency to find an alternative to breaching the sandbar at the mouth of the Russian River, a procedure that destroys a fresh-water lagoon that forms naturally there.

Steelhead and chinook salmon are listed as threatened and coho as endangered on the Endangered Species List.

“It’s an important document for the recovery of the coho salmon and steelhead,” said Bill Hearn, a National Marine Fisheries biologist. “It looks like the project doesn’t have a significant impact on chinook, but it has huge ramifications to the recovery of coho and steelhead.”

The program could cost up to $100 million over 15 years and would be paid for with local domestic-use water rates and federal funds, said Grant Davis, the Water Agency assistant general manager.

The reduced Russian River flows, however, are being studied by residents of the lower river, whose concern for the fishery is matched by a concern for the impact on recreation.

“We could be looking at a whole lot less water if they are going to reduce the flows,” said Don McEnhill of Russian Riverkeepers. “They are not the people who have to pay refunds to customers who don’t have a good time.”

It is also reviving a citizens group that opposed a low-flow proposal four years ago.

“We will be looking at it and develop a plan to stop the implementation of it, if that is what we want to do,” said Royce Brooks of Guerneville.

The federal Biological Opinion, released under the federal Endangered Species Act, will be discussed Wednesday at a 4 p.m. meeting of the Public Policy Facilitating Committee, made up of representatives of local, state and federal agencies. The session is at the Wells Fargo Center in Santa Rosa.

Water Agency officials said they are required by the federal Endangered Species Act to implement the order, although the actions to implement it are subject to environmental review.

The opinion comes after 11 years of study by biologists and finds that the current way the Water Agency and Army Corps of Engineers run the water system is harmful to the fishery, Hearn said.

The central problem is the velocity of water in the Russian River and Dry Creek. Because of releases from Warm Springs Dam on Dry Creek and Coyote Valley Dam on the Russian River, the flows are too fast for the steelhead and coho juveniles.

The agencies are ordered to reduce the upper Russian River flows by 60 cubic feet per second, to 125 cfs, from July through October. That in turn requires reducing the amount of water released from Coyote Valley Dam and Lake Mendocino.

It would enhance fish habitat, conserve water in Lake Mendocino for the fall salmon run and reduce the amount of water flowing downstream to Jenner, where federal regulators want a natural fresh-water lagoon.

Flows from Warm Springs Dam/Lake Sonoma would be kept at the low end of current releases, about 100 cfs, and restoration work along Dry Creek would be required, primarily with placement of boulders and logs to create pools for fish.

Dry Creek, with the cold water coming from Lake Sonoma, now is a habitat for an estimated 75,000 juvenile steelhead, with a potential for 300,000 with the flows and stream work, Hearn said.

Water Agency biologists, however, conducted a fish survey a week ago and did not find any coho salmon in the creek.

“That is a concern,” said David Manning, the Water Agency’s principal environmental specialist. “Coho are not faring well. That cold water is a tremendous resource. That is a unique condition in this part of California, certainly in the Russian River watershed.”

The reduced flows from both dams would not affect agriculture and would provide enough water for the Water Agency to supply the 600,000 residents it serves from Windsor to San Rafael, said Pam Jeane, the Water Agency’s deputy director of operations.

Still, federal regulators are ordering the Water Agency to study the feasibility of putting a pipeline down Dry Creek Road or West Dry Creek Road to its percolation ponds and pumps at Forestville.

The Water Agency also is ordered to allow creation of a fresh-water lagoon at Jenner by refraining from using heavy equipment to breach the sandbar that forms across the mouth of the Russian River. The agency trenches through the sandbar as many as 10 times a year to keep the water from rising into some riverside homes.

The breach lets salinity into the lagoon, while fresh water would be more beneficial to juvenile steelhead.

Federal regulators want the Water Agency to either let the sandbar breach naturally or build a gradually sloping berm between the river and ocean.

You can reach Staff Writer Bob Norberg at 521-5206 or bob.norberg@

pressdemocrat.com

Article at the Press Democrat