Archive for the 'Waste Discharge' Category

Appeal for Meeting on Santa Rosa’s Outfall to Steelhead Beach

Hi everyone!!

PLEASE PASS THIS EMAIL AROUND  ANYONE CONCERNED ABOUT THE RUSSIAN RIVER
DIRECT DISCHARGE (SR DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE PROJECT)….Also, please forgive
duplications of this message.

Tomorrow (Thursday) at 5 PM in City Council Chambers the BPU will hold a
meeting to certify the Final EIR on the Discharge Compliance Project, which
includes two direct discharge locations and continued use of the Laguna.
This is not project selection, which will occur in early December.

The length of the BPU meeting will depend on how many people show up.  We
don’t expect a huge crowd but hope to see many of you there.  The BPU had
anticipated certifying the document tomorrow, but we think there is a major
flaw in it.  It is significant that this change in the EIR came as a total
surprise to us.  No one from the City said a word.  The EIR was released on
Sept. 22nd, we could not get it until Sept. 24th, giving us only eight days
to study it.

RRWPC, Friends of Steelhead Beach,  and may others have serious concerns
about this certification action.  We believe there is a flaw in this
document that should prohibit certification at this time.  SR  decided
(without alerting us) to mitigate the damage to Osprey Trail by changing the
route of the pipeline.  That is good for Osprey Trail (most of it anyway)
and shows we (and the Parks Dept.) are having a strong impact on the
process.

The bad part is they did not discuss impacts of laying 48″ pipe in a very
sensitive 1/2 mile on River Rd. (from the park entrance to approximately Rio
Vista, where the pipe will turn into the park and strongly impact the West
end of the park). Remember, they had said they needed a 50′ work area to
install the pipe.  I think that would take the whole road.  There is a
significant drop on the north side of the road, so there really is no
shoulder most of the way.  I have sent a letter (attached) to them
expressing strong concerns and telling them they cannot certify the EIR
without determining  impacts and allowing the public to weigh in on them
(with response).  This could set the process back considerably which they
don’t want to do.

The construction period would last 18 months, a fact that I don’t think was
revealed in the Draft EIR.  It sounds like they would basically shut down
the west end of the park, closing access to very popular Children’s Beach
for at least one summer.  They would close the access at Rio Vista into the
park.  With the construction time up to 18 months, they could go into two
summers.  They would build a coffer dam in order to put the diffuser in the
river.  They would allow boating around it, but it’s likely to be a very
unpleasant experience for people looking to get away from that sort of
thing.

I write a great deal in my letter as to why I don’t think this project is
necessary.  I hope you can take the time to read it.

I hope many of you can come.  This is very important.  They are rushing this
certification process and need to follow CEQA regarding this significant
change in the pipeline route.

BPU MEETING TOMORROW AT 5 PM AT CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS!!

See you there.

BrendaA

Article on Rainwater Harvesting

FYI, in light of San Francisco’s new enlightenment on water management…

–Larry

Rainwater Harvesting Makes Comeback Amid Severe Drought

MALIA WOLLAN, ASSOCIATED PRESS
September 1, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO — Tara Hui climbed under her deck, nudged past a cluster of 55-gallon barrels and a roosting chicken, and pointed to a shiny metal gutter spout.

Tara Hui demonstrates how she drains water from bins stored below her deck where she harvests rainwater at her home in San Francisco. “See that?” she said. “That’s where the rainwater comes in from the roof.”

Hui is one of a growing band of people across the country turning to collected rainwater for nondrinking uses such as watering plants, flushing toilets and washing laundry.

Concern over drought and wasted resources, and stricter water conservation laws have revitalized the practice of capturing rainwater during storms and stockpiling it for use in drier times. A fixture of building design in the Roman Empire and in outposts along the American frontier, rainwater harvesting is making a comeback in states including Texas, North Carolina and California.

“We call it ‘the movement that’s taking the nation by storm,’ ” said Robyn Hadley, spokeswoman for the Austin, Texas-based American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association, whose membership has jumped by more than 40 percent this year.

Hui, 37, got her first 55-gallon plastic barrel for free five years ago. The barrel had been packed with maraschino cherries, so when rain first filled it, the water smelled like candied fruit.

Now, she has a daisy chain of 25 linked barrels under her back deck with a combined capacity of nearly 1,250 gallons. She built the system herself, after searching the Internet for information and buying the necessary plumbing parts at a hardware store. The whole setup cost her $200.

The average American uses 101 gallons of water a day at home and in the yard. Add in agricultural and industrial water use and that climbs to an average of 1,430 gallons per day per person.

Scientists warn that climate change will result in more severe droughts and erratic storms worldwide, and this spring was the driest in California’s 114 years of record-keeping. Extreme drought and abnormally dry conditions persist across large swaths of the country, with states in the West and Southeast hit hardest.

Even in a drought, it only takes a few hours of heavy rain to fill all 25 of Hui’s barrels. She uses that water during the summer to irrigate her back yard.

This fall, San Francisco will try to recruit more people to hoard the rain. The city will be putting $100,000 toward hosting how-to workshops and offering rebates and discounts on rainwater catchment tanks.

In addition to conserving water, these efforts help alleviate the problem of storm runoff. Asphalt-covered roads, sidewalks and parking lots repel storm water, forcing it down storm drains and into creeks rather than allowing it to soak into soil. Big flushes of storm water in water treatment systems can send raw sewage flowing into the ocean. Overloaded streams can cause flooding and damage salmon habitat.

Elsewhere, roofs are being used to collect rain from Austin to Seattle. Santa Monica’s new library sits atop a 200,000-gallon rainwater cistern, and in August the city launched a rainwater rebate program for homeowners. In Marin County, a recent seminar on rainwater harvesting attracted a standing-room-only crowd of several hundred.

Doug Pushard, a software entrepreneur and rain collection enthusiast based in Santa Fe, N.M., runs HarvestH2O.com, a Web-based organization providing information on rainwater harvesting. It got more than 23,000 page views in July, almost triple the number he got in the same month last year, along with numerous calls and e-mails.

New companies and ingenuity in plumbing and policy are pushing rainwater harvesting from the off-the-grid fringe to the core of 21st-century green building design.

“You still have to be a tinkerer to make things work, but that’s changing,” Pushard said.

Every year, Sunset Magazine sponsors several “idea houses” featuring sustainable building design. As many as 40,000 people stream through each house to study the latest in green architecture. The 2007 idea houses in San Francisco and Lake Tahoe collected rainwater, as will this year’s idea house in Monterey.

“We’re going to see a lot more design features for recycled water and rainwater catchment,” said Dave Walls, executive director of the California Building Standards Commission, which in July adopted new building codes for the state requiring new buildings to strictly conserve water.

In June, The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave a Washington-based nonprofit $4.2 million to determine whether rainwater harvesting could provide potable water to the billions of poor people worldwide who lack access to clean water. Drought-prone and groundwater-scarce places like Australia, the Bahamas, Iran and parts of India are already busy pooling precipitation.

“People don’t think about where their water comes from or how much they use,” Hui said as she used her collected rainwater for irrigation. “We all need to.”

San Francisco’s New Rainwater Harvesting Rules

FYI…
Brock

Stormwater Enthusiasts,

Please join us for a fun-filled evening of music, snacks and drinks on
September 23rd at 5:30 pm at the Bayview Boat Club to celebrate our
latest stormwater milestone - San Francisco’s new Rainwater Harvesting
Rules. Homeowners are now finally able to legally disconnect their
downspouts and use rainwater for non-potable purposes both inside and
outdoors.

As far as we know, San Francisco is the first city in California to
formally adopt this practice. These rules were developed by staff from
the San Francisco Department of Building Inspection, Department of
Public Health and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.

A special thanks to Judy West, member of the SFPUC Citizens’ Advisory
Committee, for hosting the event. There will be snacks and a no-host
bar at 5:30 and jazz at 8pm. The Bayview Boat Club is located at 489
Terry Francois Blvd. (formerly China Basin St.)

RSVP to Rosey Jencks at rjencks@sfwater.org

Rosey

P.S. If you haven’t heard yet, start spreading the word to your family
and friends about the Oct. 11 Big Blue Bucket Eco-Fair. We’ll have lots
of stormwater-related activities including free rainbarrel raffles and
rainbarrel installation workshops. Visit our website for information at
www.BigBlueBucket.org.
_________________________________________
Rosey A. Jencks
Urban Watershed Management Program
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission
1145 Market, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94103
rjencks@sfwater.org | 415-934-5762
http://stormwater.sfwater.org

Discussion Rainwater Catchment and Use of Greywater

Hi all,
The email below came in response to the one I sent out earlier on rainwater harvesting. I had also sent it to folks on a list of people working at the County of Sonoma level on developing a graywater policy that ideally should bring on incentives (vs. the huge disincentives currently in place) for graywater and then the topic next our group plans on talking about is rainwater/roofwater harvesting. Currently, since the county has no category for rainwater – they technically consider it “graywater”. I had pointed this issue out to the group as an indication of how much catching up we have to do at the county level and was happy to have the folks in SF reply with the following back up!

Anyway, I thought some folks may be interested in this response from an official in San Francisco’s Urban Watershed Management Program!!

Some hope out there…

Brock

Hello all,

I work in the San Francisco PUC’s Wastewater Enterprise. I have been following your progress in Sonoma County on greywater with great interest and look forward to attending the next meeting and learning from your efforts. I’m sorry I have been unable to participate thus far!

I wanted to make a few comments about rainwater harvesting, a practice that we are promoting here in San Francisco along with other LID strategies. Rainwater is the most overlooked part of our water portfolio. We are promoting the use of rainwater harvesting for non-potable uses such as toilet flushing, washdown areas, and irrigation. We are working with our Departments of Public Health and Building Inspection to permit rainwater harvesting systems in San Francisco without requiring treatment to potable standards - only a first flush diverter will be required for non-potable uses. Our Department of Public Health has rightly agreed that rainwater is not the most dangerous thing in a person’s toilet. For systems that will involve body contact or drinking water, potable standards still apply.

As you all know, the benefits of rainwater harvesting are numerous:
• Keep relatively clean water out of the combined sewer system and make it available for use

• Reduce the energy and chemicals needed to treat stormwater in San Francisco’s combined sewer and the energy expended transporting water from far away

• Reduce the volume and peak flows of stormwater entering the sewer, thereby reducing flooding and combined sewer overflows

• Reduce the volume of potable water (brought all the way from Hetch Hetchy!) used for non-potable applications such as irrigation, toilet flushing, vehicle washdown, and cooling systems
Tara Hui, mentioned in the article that was sent out, is working with us here at the SFPUC as part of our team to educate residents about rainwater harvesting and do demonstration projects to teach people how to install these systems themselves. We will also be doing a rain barrel giveaway, followed by a rain barrel discount program in partnership with Cole Hardware. Our hope is to expand into ever larger containers - the bigger the cistern, the greater the benefit. But we’re starting with a focus on rain barrels to get people started.

Looking forward to learning more about your greywater efforts,

Sarah

Hey Graywater group,

I wanted to send you all the following AP story and the announcement of Brad Lancaster’s upcoming talk and book signing for his second volume on Rainwater Harvesting for Drylands.
The first note below is an email that I was just sent from a citizen, which was sent to me to emphasize that fact that as stated officially by the County of Sonoma - “ we currently view rainwater as graywater”!!!
I really am looking forward to unpacking this issue sooner than later – “rainwater as graywater” – really!!! Wow??
I look forward to working with you all on changing that policy perception, as this issue has obviously been addressed by many many other municipalities.

Brock Dolman

Hi David

I added your name to the Graywater/Rainwater Collection Working Group. Attached are some policy references compiled by the Occidental Arts and Ecology Center. I hope Randy Leach and Zach Rounds can help you with your project to plumb rainwater back into the house. As we currently view rainwater as graywater, the only way you’d be able to permit the rainwater source back into the house would be to meet potable standards through treatment of some sort. Since we don’t permit water quality, I’m hoping Zach can help.

Thanks

James

Letter to State Water Board on Recycling Water Policy

River Friends;

Here is a letter (attached)  I just sent to the State and Regional Boards
about the State Recycling Policy.  I have not included the photos I sent or
the final Laguna Foundation Report on the Ludwigia Project (from last year)
in this email.  Please let me know if you want to see these and I’ll pass
them on separately.  (I don’t know how to condense them, and I didn’t want
to cause computer problems.)

I have also included a recent letter by Linda Sheehan on the State General
Permit for Recycling.  She really lays out the issues in a much clearer and
better way than I could have done, and I urge you all to read her comments.
Please forgive any duplications and feel free to pass this information on.

This is a critically important issue.  Regional Board staff have expressed
significant concerns about this.  Please let me know if you received it okay
and whether you have any questions or comments.  The State Board has not yet
developed language on “incidental runoff”, the sticking point of this whole
recycling policy and the thing I’m most concerned about.  Please consider
the importance of this item.

Hope you are having a good holiday weekend.

Brenda

Tam Doduc, Chair and Members
State Water Resources Control Board

Email:  commentletters@waterboards.ca.gov

Dear Chair Doduc and Board Members:

We understand that you will be taking information from stakeholder groups at
your meeting next Tuesday, Sept. 2nd.  We will not be able to attend but
would like to provide our perspective on this issue. We also wish to support
the comments made by Linda Sheehan.  We realize that we may be too late to
have our letter considered for the meeting, but since this is an on-going
process, we would like our letter entered into the record and considered
during future deliberations.  Please advise us as to the status of this
communication and whether we need to resubmit this information at a later
date.

We attach our letter,  the final Ludwigia Report, a few newspaper articles
on irrigation, and 8 pictures on Ludwigia and over-irrigation.  Because of
the number of attachments, WE WILL SEND TWO EMAILS WITH DIFFERENT
ATTACHMENTS IN EACH, to make sure they go through.  Please let us know if
you have received them okay or whether we need to resend in a different
format.

Thank you for your consideration.  We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Brenda Adelman

New Book on Water Recommended

Hey Water lovers,

I just wanted to let you all know about a brand new book: Water Consciousness: How We All Have to Change to Protect Our Most Critical Resource

The breadth of content by big name eco-thinker/writers is amazing and I am honored to say that I, as well, have but a small chapter in the book!

Have a look at the website for the book and to order your own copy!! http://waterconsciousness.com

Mostly Water,
Brock Dolman

Brock Dolman
WATER Institute Director
Occidental Arts and Ecology Center

Official Comments on DEIR for Water Use

Marc Bautista,

SCWA

Please find attached Word .doc file containing my comments re NBWRA DEIR.

Please let me know if there are any problems with the receipt of this document by the end of the public comment date.

Just as an added comment, I am of the opinion that events and conditions are changing at such a pace that this DEIR will be hoplessly dated by the time it is completed. This might be a good place to stop further waste of public funds.

Thank you,

Tom Yarish

Mill Valley

nbwra-eir-8-24-08

Comments on Santa Rosa’s Leaky Pipes

Dear Brenda,
As usual you are right on the target. The leaking gravity sewer collection
mains act as giant French Drain collectors of ground water, reducing the
recharge while polluting the ground water with ex-filtration at times. Small
diameter STEP systems would not and cost less to install and operate.

Northern California River Watch has been addressing the issue of
infiltration/ ex-filtration in its environmental litigation for many years.

The same problem is occurring in many of the vineyard plantings that have
installed tile or under-drains. These drains quickly drain off the fields
making land that would otherwise be seasonally wet sponge stay relatively
unsaturated. The result is very evident in the increased flashy flooding we
experience in Graton and other parts of the county. Instead of soaking into
the former apple orchards and pastures, the rain water is drained off
quickly. vineyards develop a plow pan and this limitsthe rate of percolation
down into the water table. Quickly draining off the water and limiting the
depth of the sponge means that far less water is retained going into summer.
By late summer when the smaller creeks are drying out, the problem is
further exacerbated by irrigating from wells adjacent to these same creeks.
This agricultural practice of draining off most of the winter flows needs to
be addressed or floods will continue to get worse while summer flows will
continue to drop.

Bob Rawson

Here’s a letter I just sent to the PD

Brenda

Dear Editor:

Richard Dowd, Chair of Santa Rosa’s Board of Public Utilities, was quoted in
a recent article stating, “If we can shut off the infiltration and inflow,
we don’t have to collect it, treat it or dispose of it. The savings could
be substantial.” This was in reference to the many old, leaky pipes that
collect the City’s sewage and send it off for treatment.

For years Russian River Watershed Protection Committee has been requesting
emphasis on pipe repair and replacement rather than continued construction
of expensive infrastructure that increases river discharges. What never
gets mentioned is all the potable rain water that gets wasted when it could
be recharging our aquifers. The article mentions that flows can go as high
as 100 million gallons a day. This is almost seven times higher than normal
and represents wasted potable water supplies.

In light of global warming concerns and many summer flow problems in the
Russian River, this rainwater could provide a heretofore unconsidered and
greatly needed additional water resource.

Furthermore, while Santa Rosa has a good treatment system as compared to
many others, their wastewater still contains many unregulated contaminants
that could be contributing to problems for endangered salmonid species and
drinking water supplies. Fixing leaky pipes should be prioritized over
massive and expensive new infrastructure that would bring direct discharge
to the Russian River at Healdsburg or Forestville.

Brenda Adelman

Links to Comments on SR’s Recycled Water Project

Here’s the link to comments received by SR on the Discharge and Storage options. Please forgive duplications.

Brenda

Incremental Recycled Water Program (IRWP) Update
August 5, 2008

Comments received on the City of Santa Rosa’s Discharge Compliance and Seasonal Storage Projects Draft EIRs are now available on the City’s web site as noted below. Responses to these comments are currently being prepared. Both documents are scheduled to be certified this Fall (2008) and will be fully noticed prior to the meetings;

• Discharge Compliance Project EIR - Comment Letters http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/utilities/irwp/discharge/Pages/studies_reports.aspx

• Seasonal Storage Project EIR - Comment Letters http://www.recycledwaterprogram.com/departments/utilities/irwp/storage/Pages/studies_reports.aspx

Additional information is available at: IRWP http://www.recycledwaterprogram.com/ (http://www.SRCity.org/IRWP).

If you know others who would like to receive periodic e-mail updates on the Incremental Recycled Water Program, please have them send an e-mail request to: SRrecycledwater@DataInstincts.com.

Please contact our office if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Mark Millan

North Bay Water Recycling Program

Dear friends -

The North Bay Water Reuse Authority has gone ahead and just released their Notice of Preparation for the North Bay Water Recycling Program, the subject of HR236 and S1472. They are expediting public meetings next week to solicit comments on the scope of the project, and what should be covered in the Draft EIR. All scoping comments are due by Aug. 25th.

All of our negotiations to get a more meaningful and comprehensive list of Project Objectives were ultimately weakened significantly when SCWA’s and Napa Sanitary District’s representatives to the NBWRA decided in late May that the objectives we had negotiated since January were too detailed and restrictive for them to use in the NOP. The NBWRA’s final Project Objectives list is below.

Marc Holmes (The Bay Institute) urged them and the EIR consultants (Environmental Science Associates, Petaluma) to give us the opportunity for a more detailed discussion of scoping comments, in a special meeting with them. They have agreed to do that, to try to capture our thoughts, critiques, and more detailed objectives.

Our Scoping Meeting with them will be held next week, very likely in Petaluma. The proposed date and time is: Wednesday 8/6, 10 - 11.30 am, Petaluma (location to be determined)
Please confirm your availability a.s.a.p. - email me at my address above, so I’ll know how large a room we need. (if you have a better location central to all of us, please let us know)

This is our next real opportunity to try to shape this project to protect our source waters of the Russian & Eel Rivers and S.R. Plain groundwaters. Please let me know asap of your availability. In part they are using this meeting to gauge our fortitude and the breadth and depth of concern beyond my own presentations to them, so a good turnout with strong comments is very important. This is our chance to tell them what should be included in the Draft EIR. (and get it on the record).

Absent your ability to attend this small group meeting, you will need to get your written comments to SCWA by Aug. 25.

FYI, the Senate bill S1472 (Feinstein) is currently on hold, pending the Bureau of Reclamation’s review of the engineering and financial feasibility, and their recommendation for this project’s eligibility on the Title XVI Water Recycling list of projects. USBR has until 12/23/08 to make that recommendation, but could act earlier (as is being urged by SCWA and other supporters).

As we’ve noted in earlier comments on this project:• This Project would send some 22-30,000 acre feet of recycled water, originally taken from the Eel and Russian Rivers and Santa Rosa Plain groundwater by SCWA and used by its contractor cities, then treated and pumped through a massive pipeline project mostly to benefit grape growers who have overdrafted their local water supplies in southern Sonoma and Napa Valleys and Solano county. We strongly believe that the highest priority for reuse of treated wastewater is to use it locally by cities to greatly reduce current and future urban demands for water from our North Coast rivers, not to create new vineyard customers. This Project dis-incentivizes local reuse by paying dischargers to pump it elsewhere.
• This SCWA-Bureau of Reclamation Project would use 5-11,000 new horsepower for pumps, but deliver only 1400-1459AF/Yr of recycled water to displace potable water demands in Novato and Sonoma. There is no proposal to offset or reduce the GHG generated by this pumping.
• The Project cost is estimated at $311-512M in capital costs, with $10-12M/yr operating costs.
• Support current and future urban reuse needs, instead of relying on new water supplies pumped from the rivers and wells. Displacing potable water now used for irrigating parks, playfields, medians, landscaping, etc, for industrial heating and cooling processes, for instance, as well as for ‘purple plumbing’ for toilets and urinals, should be the first priority for the recycled water.

• As SCWA’s own literature states: “Less is More, any time of the year. Using less water means more water in Lake Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, and the Russian River. We rely on these sources for drinking water, wildlife habitat, and recreational activities.”

The NBay Water Reuse Authority is now also claiming that as wastewater treatment agencies, they have no control over trying to reduce water consumption by the water supplying agencies/contractors, so much of our concern about reducing impacts on source waters is beyond their control. “Not my problem…” Yet, the biggest fish in this pond is SCWA itself, which is the largest water purveyor on the North Coast. We will need to puncture this defensive and myopic institutional view of water resources and restoration.

Thank you for your continued support and hard work to try to make this project a showcase for reuse, instead of a 1950’s style ‘pump and pipe’ project to serve new customers.

David Keller