Archive for the 'Environmental Impacts' Category

Toxic Waters: Rulings Restrict Clean Water Act, Foiling E.P.A.

CHARLES DUHIGG and JANET ROBERTS
February 28, 2010

Thousands of the nation’s largest water polluters are outside the Clean Water Act’s reach because the Supreme Court has left uncertain which waterways are protected by that law, according to interviews with regulators.

View: Toxic Creek

As a result, some businesses are declaring that the law no longer applies to them. And pollution rates are rising.

Companies that have spilled oil, carcinogens and dangerous bacteria into lakes, rivers and other waters are not being prosecuted, according to Environmental Protection Agency regulators working on those cases, who estimate that more than 1,500 major pollution investigations have been discontinued or shelved in the last four years.

Continue reading ‘Toxic Waters: Rulings Restrict Clean Water Act, Foiling E.P.A.’

PSA: 28th Annual Salmonid Restoration Mar. 10-13

Hello,
Please help publicize the upcoming Salmonid Restoration Federation and American Fisheries Society Cal-Neva Conference with the attached press release and conference announcement.

Please email SRF if you can help distribute conference agenda packets and posters. Please indicate how many we should send and to what address.
Thank you,
PSA:
28th Annual Salmonid Restoration & 44th Annual AFS Cal-Neva Conference Agenda and Registration Online at www.calsalmon.org
The joint conference will be held March 10-13 at the Redding Convention Center in Redding, CA. The conference theme is “Fisheries Science and Restoration in a Changing Climate” and will include watershed tours, workshops, outstanding scientific presentations on coastal stream habitat restoration and salmon recovery. The conference will features special events including a screening of The filmRiver of Renewal , an AFS Social at Turtle Bay, a Poster Session and Job Fair, a 5 K Spawning run, and a wild salmon banquet with cabaret and music by Absynth Quintet http://www.absynthquintet.com/
Conference Announcement:
28th Annual Salmonid Restoration & 44th Annual AFS Cal-Neva Conference Agenda and Registration Online at www.calsalmon.org
Salmonid Restoration Federation and the California-Nevada American Fisheries Society chapter will co-host the 28th Annual Salmonid Restoration Conference and the 44th Annual Cal-Neva AFS Conference in Redding, California. We are truly excited about this new collaborative effort. The theme of the conference is Fisheries Restoration and Science in a Changing Climate. The first two days of the conference will be filled with symposia, full-day workshops continuing education classes, and field tours. A half-day plenary session will be followed by 1.5 days of technical, biological, and policy-related concurrent sessions. This conference will focus on a broad range of salmonid, fisheries, and watershed restoration topics of concern to restoration practitioners, and the scientific fisheries community.
This year the conference will feature workshops on topics including Water Quality and TMDLs, Floodplain Restoration, a Fisheries Engineering and Stream Restoration Symposium, Stormwater Pollution Workshop, and continuing education classes on presentation skills, acoustic tag training, and River 2 D technology. Concurrent sessions include: the State of California Salmonids, Anadromous Salmonid Monitoring, Stream Channel Restoration, Central Valley Salmonid Recovery Planning, Marine and Estuarine Fisheries Research: Conservation and Management, Status, Ecology and Management of Inland Fishes and Anadromous/Migratory Fishes, Water Diversions and Fish Impediments, FERC Relicensing and Restoration Opportunities, Planning, Documenting, and Evaluating Fish Restoration Activities, Instream Flow for Salmonids, and a Contributed Papers session.
Field Tours will visit restoration projects in Clear Creek, Battle Creek, the Upper Trinity River, the Shasta River, the Upper Sacramento River and Redding urban streams. The Plenary session will feature David Montgomery author of King of Fish: the Thousand Year Run of Salmon and Dirt: the Erosion of Civilization, Larry Brown from the US Geological Survey who will discuss climate change and native fishes in the San Francisco Estuary and watershed, and Dan Bottom from the National Marine Fisheries Service will discuss “Pacific Salmon at the Crossroads and how Resilient are Salmon Ecosystems.” Maria Rea from NOAA will discuss salmonid recovery planning efforts for salmon in California.
SRF and AFS have created a dynamic conference agenda that addresses pressing issues that affect salmonid recovery and fisheries throughout the Pacific Northwest. We are also combining some of the unique features of each of our conferences. AFS will host a social at Turtle Bay, a job fair as part of the joint poster session, and a Saturday morning 5K Spawning Run. SRF will feature our annual meeting, the film screening of River of Renewal, a poster session and reception, banquet, awards ceremony, cabaret, and dance band Absynth Quintet.
For more information about the conference, to see the agenda, or to register, please visit www. calsalmon.org

Four Anti-CEQA Initiatives

URGENT: Anti-CEQA initiatives URGENT:

The ability of citizens to challenge EIRs is threatened by new
initiatives drive.  I’m not sure if you’ve heard about this, but it should be on your radar.

Four anti-CEQA initiatives have been submitted to the
Attorney General’s office and one or more of them will soon be
circulating for signatures.

The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.
They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.
In part the initiatives read:
…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”
We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:
You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.

They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.

In part the initiatives read:…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”

We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

–California Legislative Analyist
(916) 445-4656
925 L Street, Suite 1000
Sacramento, CA 95814
http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx
<http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx>
– Initiative Coordinator, California Office of the Attorney
General
P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 (916) 445-4752
http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php
<http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php>
– Attorney General’s Office California Department of Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA
94244-2550

In the meantime, we will be reviewing the measures to assess
possible legal vulnerabilities. Stay tuned.

—- from Friends of the Eel River.

URGENT: Anti-CEQA initiatives URGENT

The ability of citizens to challenge EIRs is threatened by new initiatives drive. I’m not sure if you’ve heard about this, but it should be on your radar.
Four anti-CEQA initiatives have been submitted to the Attorney General’s office and one or more of them will soon be circulating for signatures.
The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.
They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.
In part the initiatives read:
…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”
We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:
You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

–California Legislative Analyist

(916) 445-4656
925 L Street, Suite 1000
Sacramento, CA 95814
http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx
<http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx>
– Initiative Coordinator, California Office of the Attorney
General
P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 (916) 445-4752
http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php
<http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php>
– Attorney General’s Office California Department of Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA
94244-2550

In the meantime, we will be reviewing the measures to assess
possible
legal vulnerabilities. Stay tuned.

—- from Friends of the Eel River.

Santa Rosa Groundwater “Recharge”

To All,

One thing you will hear over and over about ground water in the Santa Rosa area is that it is in a “recharge area” . However this paradigm needs to shift. It implies that we can draw from the water resources without consequence because it will always “recharge and come back”. This is not true. What a water recharge area actually is can be greatly varied and un-explained. Some aquifers just dry up. With such little science and information about the county’s primary resource, it is actually quite irresponsible to assume that anyone is actually “managing groundwater”, especially officials tasked to do so.

Lloyd

More Wells Sinking the Central Valley

To All

The consolidation caused by the repeated pumping action of ASR’s (AKA “ground water banking”) causes permanent compression of the formation also. This is the biggest crime of all because the ground water storage capacity is reduced forever. It never comes back.

Lloyd

Hi Don–

The attached jpg file shows the situation in the Central Valley as of 1977–the subsidence at this site was about 36 feet over the time span indicated. It’s worse now.

The man in the photo is Joe Poland, who studied Central Valley groundwater for USGS.

Jane

Hi,
in case this didn’t get posted here yet.

Great quote I hope to hear around this watershed someday…..Don

“We don’t need any more straws going down there ’cause we’re already doing a pretty good job of sucking it dry,” says farmer Dan Errotabere, who has dug three wells as deep as 1,200 feet to irrigate his tomatoes, almonds, and garlic in recent years. “We’re using this water as a last resort, but pretty soon we’re going to need a policy to protect ourselves from ourselves.”

<http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2010/0111/Will-drilling-more-wells-in-California-help-or-hurt>http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2010/0111/Will-drilling-more-wells-in-California-help-or-hurt
Don McEnhill
Russian Riverkeeper
PO Box 1335
Healdsburg, CA 95448
707-433-1958
fx: 707-433-1989
<http://www.russianriverkeeper.org/

Russian Riverkeeper works with the community to advocate, educate, and uphold our environmental laws to ensure the protection and restoration of the Russian River for the health and benefit of all who use and enjoy it.

Take Action on Wastes

To All,

The problem of “waste” in the U.S. is both a local and a federal issue, with the Environmental Protection Agency providing the scientific veneer, among others, for the nation’s profit-at-any-cost, multibillion dollar sewage sludge, garbage, and chemical fertilizer industries. Several decades ago, after public pressure forced corporations and municipalities to stop dumping toxic sewage sludge into the oceans and waterways (it was killing all the fish and marine life and polluting beaches), the EPA decided it was time to rename this hazardous waste “organic fertilizer” (or “biosolids”) and to begin to spread municipal sewage sludge on millions of acres of non-organic farmland and rangeland. Emboldened by their success, EPA and the sludge industry then tried to tell us in 1998 that it would be OK to spread sewage sludge on organic farms as well. Fortunately OCA and the organic community beat them back as part of a massive nationwide grassroots campaign called Save Organic Standards (SOS).

A steady stream of greenwashing and false solutions that encourage waste production instead of waste reduction are coming at us from corporate marketing departments and the federal government. OCA believes that positive action to encourage waste reduction, reuse, recycling and composting (real organic composting, not renaming sewage sludge or industrial waste as compost) is most likely to arise at the local level. Several cities have taken positive actions in the direction of zero waste, but the devil is in the details.

Take household and industrial sewage sludge for example. For decades sewage sludge (the end product of the nation’s thousands of Wastewater Treatment Plants) was dumped in the oceans and rivers, now it is spread on non-organic farms and rangelands, while current industry plans include burning it and turning it into an energy source; but the fundamental problem isn’t what to do with billions of pounds of toxic sewage sludge produced every year (obviously we must isolate and contain it as hazardous waste), but rather how can we stop producing it in the first place. Household sewage, contaminated as it is with chemical cosmetics, toxic household cleaners and any number of pharmaceutical drugs poured into toilets and kitchen sinks, isn’t pristine; but, to paraphrase Bob Hope, it’s not the shit, it’s what we’ve done to it. After the toilet is flushed or the drain is emptied, household waste is funneled into a vast underground sewage system, where it joins a toxic stew of industrial and hospital wastes and rainwater runoff from our streets and highways. Allowing corporations to flood the environment and the waste stream with 100,000 synthetic, mostly toxic chemicals, (most of which end up in sewage sludge), less than 1% of which have ever been proved to be safe for the environment and public health, is a form of insanity. Besides contaminating the water and soil, this irrational so-called “sewage treatment” process wastes enormous amounts of potable water.

At a certain point, cities and towns must come to the realization that using clean water to flush away household waste; engineering rooftops, roadways and streets to funnel rainwater into our sewage systems (instead of capturing it or percolating it back into the soil); and allowing industry and hospitals to discharge toxic chemicals into our wastewater stream just doesn’t make sense. Composting (non-water) toilets, rooftop water catchments and cisterns, and zero discharge of synthetic chemicals potentially or actually proven to hazardous to human health and the environment (the “precautionary principle”) are not fringe ideas, but rather the wave of the future. That is if there is a future.

Human and animal manure, (separated from and free from chemical and pharmaceutical residues), throughout the centuries, and in the present time can and should be safely composted and utilized as a fertilizer on fields, farms, and forests. Although current organic standards prohibit the use of compost derived from human manure (properly composted animal manure is allowed) on food crops, feeding the soil with properly composted “humanure” (or producing methane gas for energy use through bio-digesters) will no doubt become the norm in the future as fossil fuel and water supplies dwindle and chemical fertilizer costs become prohibitive.

Tune in to future issues of Organic Bytes for OCA’s ideas on how we can and must reform our garbage, sludge, and chemical fertilizer industries and put an end to the rampant consumerism that is literally poisoning the planet with garbage and toxic chemical

–Larry

California’s Groundwater Shrinking because of Agricultural Use

Garance Burke,
Christian Science Monitor,
January 4, 2010

New data from satellites show the vast underground pools feeding faucets and irrigation hoses across California are running low, a worrisome trend federal scientists largely attribute to aggressive agricultural pumping.

California water pumping agricultural use

The photograph above illustrates subsidence in the San Joaquin Valley, California. In the photo, USGS scientist, Joe Poland shows subsidence between 1925 and 1977 due to fluid withdrawal and soil consolidation.

The measurements show the amount of water lost in the two main Central Valley river basins within the past six years could almost fill the nation’s largest reservoir, Lake Mead in Nevada.

“All that water has been sucked from these river basins. It’s gone. It’s left the building,” says Jay Famiglietti, an earth science professor at the University of California, Irvine, who led the research collaboration. “The data is telling us that this rate of pumping is not sustainable.”

Hundreds of farmers have been drilling wells to irrigate their crops, as three years of drought and environmental restrictions on water supplies have withered crops, jobs and profits throughout the San Joaquin Valley, where roughly half of the nation’s fruits, nuts, and vegetables are grown.

Developers and cities dependent on the tight supplies also have joined the well-drilling frenzy as the crisis has deepened.

NASA scientists and researchers from UC Irvine presented their findings at a recent conference, showcasing data from twin satellites that pick up changes in the aquifers coursing underneath the state.

The NASA mission represents the first attempt to use space-based technology to measure how much groundwater has been lost in recent years in California and elsewhere in the world.

From October 2003 through March of this year, Mr. Famiglietti and his team tracked how Earth’s gravitational pull on the satellites changed as the amount of water stored in the Sacramento and San Joaquin river basins dried up.

As river water, snowmelt, soil moisture and aquifer levels declined, the satellites sensed less of a pull to the planet, which allowed scientists to extrapolate over time how much water had disappeared.

More than three-quarters of the loss was due to groundwater pumping in the southern Central Valley, primarily to irrigate crops, researchers found.

If drilling keeps on at the same clip, scientists warned, more wells could start running dry.

“We’ve known about the conditions in California for a while since it’s one of the most pumped aquifers in the United States,” says Michael Watkins, NASA’s Pasadena-based project scientist for the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment mission.

“Hydrologists were just surprised to see that the deep water conditions had dropped so much, since it was more than we had expected,” he says.

Click here for original article

Will Drilling More Wells in California Help or Hurt?

Garance Burke, Christian Science Monitor
January 11, 2010

The government is spending $40 million in federal stimulus funds to pull water from underground aquifers in drought-stricken California, even as evidence is growing that the well-drilling boom could degrade the quality of water delivered to millions of residents.

Farmers, conservationists and engineers are criticizing the Interior Department’s plan to spend taxpayer money on digging more wells, saying the approach risks marring the environment. Canals buckle, aquifers collapse and drinking water turns saltier due to so much pumping, and studies show that the state’s water supplies are dwindling.

“We don’t need any more straws going down there ’cause we’re already doing a pretty good job of sucking it dry,” says farmer Dan Errotabere, who has dug three wells as deep as 1,200 feet to irrigate his tomatoes, almonds, and garlic in recent years. “We’re using this water as a last resort, but pretty soon we’re going to need a policy to protect ourselves from ourselves.”

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar says the government is targeting its well-drilling effort to serve remote communities and prop up California’s agricultural economy, a $36 billion industry that grows nearly half the country’s fruits, nuts and vegetables.

“The role of the federal government is to provide a helping hand. But the federal government can’t solve the water problems,” Mr. Salazar says as he sampled sliced cantaloupe with local farmers several weeks ago. “California water issues are a big mess and have been a big mess for a long time.”

Since the drought began in 2006, hundreds of new wells have been drilled and are pumping around the clock in the state, tapping aquifers that date to the days of the dinosaurs.

In the last six years alone, the amount of water that has been lost from the aquifers coursing beneath the parched Central Valley would be nearly enough to fill the nation’s largest reservoir, Nevada’s Lake Mead, NASA researchers says Monday.

Salazar announced in July the department would send emergency drought aid from President Barack Obama’s stimulus package to drill and renovate up to 135 wells. The total number has dropped since then, and authorities are still drawing up plans about how and where to drill.

The money will go to dig up to 50 new wells, retrofit up to 40 old ones and install temporary pipes and pumps to move water to crops and orchards, federal officials says. More than $2 million of the funds will be used for monitoring the real-time ecological impacts of wells in sensitive areas, and proposed new wells will undergo environmental review.

While everyone agrees the state’s aquifers are quickly being drawn down, no California or federal rules govern how much water can be pumped out. Driven by a similar set of concerns, other Western states have set up laws to limit pumping.

Dennis Freeman, who oversees a main canal that irrigates the valley’s farm fields, says even without government-financed wells, it is already costing millions to fix the damage wrought by decades of pumping.

“There’s no doubt about it, the canal is sinking,” he says, gesturing at cracked and buckled concrete panels lining the structure’s edge. “There’s more wells going in, because our growers gotta get water to their crops. But we’re always concerned about the effect that will have.”

Continue reading ‘Will Drilling More Wells in California Help or Hurt?’

The Toilet That Can Help Solve Our Water and Energy Problems

The Toilet That Can Help Solve Our Water and Energy Problems
By Gar Smith, Earth Island Journal. Posted December 28, 2009.
Upwards of 3 million people die annually from diarrhea, dysentery, and parasitic diseases — all for the want of clean water. Meanwhile, each year in the water-rich United States, 2.1 billion gallons of the world’s most precious liquid are used, not to water thirsty crops or slake parched throats, but to flush human waste from home toilets to municipal sewers. While harvesting rainwater and recycling graywater are fine strategies, it’s time to get to the seat of the problem. We need a Toilet Revolution. As frequently happens, the solution to this modern problem can be found in the recent past — and the Third World present. Jeff Conant, author of The Community Guide to Environmental Health, has traveled the world in search of the perfect “waterless toilet.” He found it in the Mexican town of Tepotzlan, which boasts hundreds of “non-traditional waterless” eco-loos. In the 1980s, Tepotzlan’s innovators got a boost when former UNICEF worker Ron Sawyer settled in to help the locals design a new generation of “eco-san” toilets.
While the practice of using human waste as fertilizer is as old as humanity itself, Tepotzlan’s eco-sanistas marked an engineering watershed when they found a way to separate feces from urine. A locally designed toilet seat harvests the fluids while allowing the solid wastes to fall into a dry compost toilet. (Not such a strange idea: The human body is designed to send solid and liquid wastes in opposite directions.) One immediate result of separating pee from poo is the elimination of the unpleasant aromas associated with the traditional outhouse.
While installing waterless toilets in high-rise apartments might raise certain engineering challenges, “urine-separating dry toilets” are being adopted around the world — from South Africa, Peru, Cuba, and India to the United States, where composting waterless toilets can be purchased online. There are several to choose from, including Biolet, Envirolet, Sun-Mar, the venerable-sounding Clivus Multrum, and the EcoJohn (an “incinerating toilet” that’s being used in US homes and military camps). Most sell for around $1,500. Home Depot lists a Biolet for $1,400 (about the price of a new fridge). The Nature’s Head urine-separating dry toilet (designed by sailors for onboard use) is a bargain, priced at $850.
Dry-compost toilets not only conserve water, they also protect rivers and oceans. By circumventing modern sewers, dry-compost toilets avoid diverting nitrogen, potassium, and phosphate-rich wastes from the land (where they would enrich the soil) to rivers and oceans, where they cause algal blooms, oxygen-robbing eutrophication, and oceanic “dead zones.”
The first flush of the Toilet Revolution was heard in Orange County, of all places. In 1997, San Diego announced plans to have a “Toilet-to-Tap” system up and running by 2001. In 1998, California’s governor signed a law directing the state to evaluate the potential of recycling the post-toilet flow to “ensure that any water produced by these systems meets the identical standards that our drinking water does now.” While San Diego’s filtration system successfully reduced contaminants to the same level as “untreated fresh water,” many people had trouble swallowing the idea of sipping treated waste water, even though toilet-to-tap is a proven, Space-Age technology. For decades, America’s orbiting astronauts have thrived by drinking their own urine, recycled endlessly through space shuttle filtration systems.
There’s another powerful reason to separate and recycle urine. It turns out that urine — the world’s most abundant waste — could become the “fuel of the future.” Ohio University researcher Geradine Botte has developed a catalyst that can extract hydrogen fuel from urine. While it takes 1.23 volts to split two hydrogen atoms from H2O, it only takes 0.37 volts to strip four hydrogen atoms from a urea molecule. That’s twice as much hydrogen for one-third the effort. The Royal Society of Chemistry’s journal, Chemical Communications, confirms Botte’s discovery: “While water is an increasingly limited essential resource,” the journal notes, “there will never be a lack of urine.”
Existing nickel electrode technology can be easily scaled up to produce hydrogen from the effluent of today’s sewage treatment plants. As Botte notes: “We do not need to reinvent the wheel.” But tomorrow’s water-smart homeowners will need to adapt. There will be one more container to add to the line-up for weekly curbside pick-up — the urine bin.
Solving two problems for the price of one is a rare deal, especially when tankless toilets will start paying back the investment immediately as household water use falls by one-third. Sometimes, relief can come from surprising places. If this all pans out, we may need to replace the phrase “piss-poor” with “urine-rich.”