Author Archive for admin

Two Logging Plans Threaten Sheephouse Creek Watershed

Sheephouse Creek (near Duncans Mills in Sonoma County) is important for its watershed values near the coastal zone as well as an important salmon spawning and rearing area. In addition, there is a current Coho captive broodstock program overseen by the Department of fish and Game.

Sheephouse Creek Boundry Map

A Non-industrial Management Plan (NTMP) for logging of 331 acres and a THP for logging of 81 acres have been filed with CDF (now known as CalFire). Together these plans total 442 acres or 20% of the watershed acreage. If allowed to cut as proposed, these plans together with already approved plans Within the last ten years amount to almost half of the forests in the Sheephouse watershed, creating potential cumulative impacts. Unfortunately, CalFire only does a THP by THP analysis and no real analysis on the broader cumulative impacts within the watershed.

Sheephouse Creek is in danger of being adversely impacted causing, in part, the demise of one of the last few remaining coho streams in Northern California. Currently, the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is conducting a Coho Salmon Impact Evaluation for Sheephouse Creek. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has declined to review the plan but sent a letter to Cal Fire stating the critical importance of this habitat area for Coho. It must be pointed out that Cal Fire is the lead agency on approving these plans and has a history of ignoring the professional opinions of other agencies.

Below are links to each logging plan for more information. Also see Activist Corner, this blog, for discussion on what some activists are doing and to get more information to send comments on the plans.

Letters of concern go to:
CDF c/o 135 Ridgeway Avenue,
Santa Rosa, CA. 95402
or at santarosapubliccomment@fire.ca.gov

For the Non-Industrial Management Plan, 1-08-NTMP-004SON, go to:
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/NTMPs2008/1-08NTMP-004SON

For the Timber Harvest Plan, 1-08-025SON, go to:
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2008/1-08-025SON

Sheephouse Creek Watershed Area
Sheephouse Creek Watershed Area
Past, Present, and Proposed Timber Harvest

Elmer’s favorite poem

In memory of Elmer Dudik Jr. 1947-2008,
this was Elmer’s favorite poem:

Escape

When we get out of the Glass
Bottles of our ego.

And when we escape the
Squirrels turning in
The cages of our
Personality

And get into the forests again
We shall shiver with cold
And fright

But things will happen to us
So that we don’t know
Ourselves.

Cool unlying life will rush in.
And passion will
Make our bodies taut
With power.

We shall stomp our feet
With new power
and old things will fall down.

We shall laugh, and
Institutions will curl up
Like burnt paper.

D.H. Lawrence

What Will the North Bay Water Recycling Program Really Cost?

This week we focus on a deal being promulgated called the North Bay Water Recycling Program. There is an analysis and commentary by David Keller and an official comment letter by the Sonoma County Water Coalition. Note that the notice of preparation has project objectives not consistent with the analysis. Using the link, download their documents to see for yourself. [See Notice of Preparation Post]

This Project would send some 22-30,000 acre feet of recycled water, originally taken from the Eel and Russian Rivers and Santa Rosa Plain groundwater by SCWA and used by its contractor cities, then treated and pumped through a massive pipeline project mostly to benefit grape growers who have overdrafted their local water supplies in southern Sonoma and Napa Valleys and Solano county.

We strongly believe that the highest priority for reuse of treated wastewater is to use it locally by cities to greatly reduce current and future urban demands for water from our North Coast rivers, not to create new vineyard customers. This Project dis-incentivizes local reuse by paying dischargers to pump it elsewhere.

This SCWA-Bureau of Reclamation Project would use 5-11,000 new horsepower for pumps, but deliver only 1400-1459 acre feet per year of recycled water to displace potable water demands in Novato and Sonoma. There is no proposal to offset or reduce the cost generated by this pumping. The Project cost is estimated at $311-512M in capital costs, with $10-12M/yr operating costs.

Support current and future urban reuse needs, instead of relying on new water supplies pumped from the rivers and wells. Displacing potable water now used for irrigating parks, playfields, medians, landscaping, etc, for industrial heating and cooling processes, for instance, as well as for ‘purple plumbing’ for toilets and urinals, should be the first priority for the recycled water.

As SCWA’s own literature states: “Less is More, any time of the year. Using less water means more water in Lake Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, and the Russian River. We rely on these sources for drinking water, wildlife habitat, and recreational activities.”

The NBay Water Reuse Authority is now also claiming that as wastewater treatment agencies, they have no control over trying to reduce water consumption by the water supplying agencies/contractors, so much of our concern about reducing impacts on source waters is beyond their control. “Not my problem…” Yet, the biggest fish in this pond is SCWA itself, which is the largest water purveyor on the North Coast. We will need to puncture this defensive and myopic institutional view of water resources and restoration.

Thank you for your continued support and hard work to try to make this project a showcase for reuse, instead of a 1950’s style ‘pump and pipe’ project to serve new customers.

David Keller
Bay Area Director Friends of the Eel River

Notice of Preparation

NBWRA North Bay Water Recycling Program (formerly the North San Pablo Restoration and Reuse Project) Scoping Documents (23 pages with maps)

Project Objectives The Authority wishes to implement “A cooperative program in the San Pablo Bay region that supports sustainability and environmental enhancement by expanding the use of recycled water.” The following project objectives have been developed by the Authority for the North San Pablo Bay Restoration and Reuse Project. The project is proposed to promote the expanded beneficial use of recycled water in the North Bay region to:

  • Offset urban and agricultural demands on potable supplies;
  • Enhance local and regional ecosystems;
  • Improve local and regional water supply reliability;
  • Maintain and protect public health and safety;
  • Promote sustainable practices;
  • Give top priority to local needs for recycled water; and
  • Implement recycled water facilities in an economically viable manner.

Sonoma County Water Coalition’s Comment Regarding Water Plan

Dear Chairman Bingaman and Members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee,
The Sonoma County Water Coalition (SCWC) includes 32 organizations representing more than 25,000 citizens in Sonoma County, California. The unifying momentum behind this coalition is a shared concern for the water resources of Sonoma County.

We urge you to defeat this defective bill (S.1472 North Bay Water Reuse Program Act of 2007 Companion Bill, H.R.236) in its present form, and we offer our assistance in rewriting it in the next session to address our concerns.

SCWC has steadfastly worked since 2004 to get public policies in place to protect and restore our beleaguered water resources. This includes both the Russian River and the Eel River, which each provide home to three threatened species of federally listed salmonids, as well as overdrafted and declining groundwater basins throughout the county. Our county’s primary public water provider, the Sonoma County Water Agency (SCWA), has recently been subject to California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) mandatory 15% cutbacks in withdrawals from the Russian River to protect Fall-run Chinook in the Russian River. SWRCB has also asked SCWA to come up with plans that involve no increases in demands for water pumped from the Russian River to supply future growth.

The necessity to plan for the long term future of reliable water supplies in our region, while protecting and restoring our natural public trust resources, has required a shift in public policy. We are working hard with public policy makers, agricultural interests, and commercial and residential ratepayers to reduce demands for potable water, to maximize water efficiencies and conservation (saving energy and greenhouse gas emissions, too), as well as supporting appropriate reuse of highly treated wastewater within the SCWA service areas to displace potable water demands, and eliminate exports of SCWA water to other regions.

We are now seeing water planning that incorporates some of the best thinking in the nation, allowing at least one city (Petaluma) to plan for its next 20 years’ growth with a zero-increment in potable water demand. This example follows the lead of other municipal water suppliers in California (including Los Angeles, East Bay Municipal Utility District and Marin Municipal Water District) which have proven that intelligent use of all water resources is not only feasible, but a requisite tool for the arid West’s future.

Unfortunately, our review of the North Bay Water Reuse Program Act of 2007 (”Project”) S.1472 (Feinstein, Boxer) and H.R.236 (Thompson, Woolsey) brings us to strongly oppose this legislation.

The bill fails to set any priority that the recycled water be used to offset and reduce local potable water demands first. Instead, it provides for tens of thousands of acres of new and expanded agricultural irrigation using treated municipal wastewater derived from SCWA customers. While some of this wastewater is currently discharged into San Pablo Bay, reuse of the water to substantially reduce demands on the already overtaxed SCWA water supply system should come first.

The bill fails to set any limits on exporting water, or to mandate addressing the impacts of those withdrawals of water pumped from SCWA sources from the Russian and Eel Rivers and Sonoma county groundwater to regions outside the SCWA service area in both Sonoma and Napa counties, primarily in different watersheds.

The bill fails to provide limits on the quantities of water to be used for expanded agricultural irrigation and environmental restoration in the proposed Project areas.

The bill fails to provide limits on how far the pipelines and pumps may be built.

The bill fails to provide limits on future use of the pipelines, particularly the plumbing that would serve the Napa-Sonoma Marsh Restoration Project at the tail end of the Project pipeline.

Continue reading ‘Sonoma County Water Coalition’s Comment Regarding Water Plan’

ON THE Russian RIVER: Oh, no! It’s Low-Flow…. again!

by Don McEnhill

GROSS! - Low flow in the River, with a concentration of runoff nutrients our yard loves (such as nitrogen and phosphorous), is heaven for algae.

Russian River

Here we go, it’s deja-vu all over again this summer with another low year for Lake Mendocino in Ukiah making an impact on flow levels in the Russian River. Our office has been taking calls from River users since the first week of June when the River flows were substantially below mandated minimum flows of 125 cubic feet per second at USGS Flow Gauge near Hacienda Bridge in Forestville.

After those calls on low-flows, we started getting calls about a massive algae bloom below the Monte Rio Bridge on the lower River. The locals told us they had never seen such a major bloom even in the lower water years such as last year and 2004. Those prior years’ lower flows resulted in impacts to boaters but less impacts to water quality.

Lower flows negatively affect water quality by increasing water temperatures and concentrating pollutants like nitrogen and phosphorous, which are nutrients that plants in our yards need to grow. One of the common responses to these conditions is algae blooms. Algae likes warm and nutrient rich water, and lowered flows on the Russian create these conditions. Algae blooms can trigger human reactions from annoyance to disgust.

Of course, when I was a kid, our reaction was to heave those hunks of the green slimey stuff at our sisters! The desired reaction was predictable, screaming horror. If fish could scream, they would when confronted by massive algae blooms. When water quality favors plant growth - such as an algae bloom - it is devastating to aquatic life like salmon or steelhead juveniles.

Algae, being a plant, produces oxygen in the water by day. However, at night, plants consume oxygen, competing with fish that need oxygen to breathe. So when we have major algae blooms, we have major crashes in oxygen levels just before sunrise, when the sun starts off a new day of photosynthesis and plants again create oxygen.

If you were a juvenile steelhead, this is like being strangled each morning by the lowered oxygen levels, and even if it doesn’t kill you, it can weaken you enough to make you easy prey for a smallmouth bass or pike minnow. Makes getting hit by an algae toss not so gross, doesn’t it? What can we do about algae blooms and lack of flows?

Algae bloom Solving the “more water in the River” part is up to our community; homeowners, businesses, farmers and government all using less water, which leads to less taken out of the River! On nutrient reduction we can all play a part as well: making sure pet waste is cleaned up - especially when at the River! - not using too much fertilizer on landscaping, and preventing sediment or dirt from getting in the River all reduce nutrient loading.

We can all benefit from more water and less nutrients in our River, whether we’re a fish or a sister.

Phosphorous Nailed as Culprit U of A’s Schindler studied lake algae for 37 years

Ed Struzik, The Edmonton Journal 2008

EDMONTON - This is the time of year every cottage owner in Alberta both loves and loathes.

The love affair is with the lakeside cabin that offers refuge from the hustle and bustle and incessant noise of city life.

The loathing comes when the lake cottagers hope to swim in or sail on turns into a dead zone of blue-green algae that kills fish and other bottom-dwelling life forms.

After a remarkable 37-year experiment, University of Alberta scientist David Schindler and his colleagues have a definitive answer for this vexing problem that plagues not only western Canada’s shallow lakes, but also thousands of freshwater and coastal ecosystems around the world.

By pumping various pollutants into Lake 227, a small pristine lake in the Experimental Lakes region of northern Ontario, they pinned down which of the chemical nutrients were key to triggering the blooms that can also make drinking water extremely toxic.

“Phosphorous really is the key to eutrophication,” says Schindler, whose study is highlighted prominently in the U.S. based Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week.

“Here in Alberta, it is especially important because the phosphorous content in the soil is naturally high, so you don’t have to add a lot to create a serious problem.”

Fifty years ago, no one knew what exactly caused algal blooms to appear on lakes and rivers.

Continue reading ‘Phosphorous Nailed as Culprit U of A’s Schindler studied lake algae for 37 years’

Schwarzenegger Pushes to Build New Dams While an Unlikely Coalition Battles to Tear Down Existing Ones

By Dan Bacher

Illustration by Jed Alexander

Illustration by Jed Alexander

A silent storm sweeping across Northern California has figuratively turned gravity on its head lately as an unlikely coalition of commercial fishermen, American Indian tribes, environmentalists and farmers battle billionaire Warren Buffett in an effort to tear down four dams on the Klamath River. A bit further south, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has just declared a drought and is once again calling for construction of new dams in the Central Valley and a peripheral canal in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

The governor has attempted to revive the long-stalled plans to build the new dams and the canal ever since he was elected, but like the declining number of salmon returning up the Sacramento River from the sea, he has found himself swimming against the current.

Continue reading ‘Schwarzenegger Pushes to Build New Dams While an Unlikely Coalition Battles to Tear Down Existing Ones’

Kayaking the Klamath while dodging the dams

Writers on the Range - by Tyler Williams

The Klamath is a 300-mile-long waterway traveling from Oregon’s Cascade Mountains to the Pacific Ocean in Northern California. Once, it was the third-most productive salmon fishing river in North America.

Today, Klamath River salmon are approaching extinction, thanks mainly to six dams that span the upper river. But things might change dramatically if the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement becomes reality — four of the Klamath dams could be slated for removal. It would be a river-restoration project unprecedented in scale, and environmental groups are ecstatic at the possibility.

To see the unfolding Klamath story first-hand, I decided to kayak the entire length of the river, starting at the aptly named Spring Creek where boiling pots of sand danced on the bottom of the creek. Water gushed into the stream from below, clean and beautiful. But several hours later, the scene had changed when I arrived at a fixture of the southern Oregon landscape — Klamath Lake. A rank odor wafted on the air, and billions of tiny green algae flecks floated on the surface of the water. I had only paddled 10 miles, but I was already a world away from the bubbling purity of Spring Creek.

Paddling was not always possible. I stood in astonished silence, wondering how I would make it downstream on a tiny spout of water that emanated from one of the Klamath River’s dams. The flow was reminiscent of a desert watercourse in my home of Arizona, not a major river in the Pacific Northwest. Yet this — and not Spring Creek – better describes today’s Klamath River.

It is a river serving many masters: Farmers demand water for irrigation, Indians fight for their share of the dwindling salmon, and we all flip light switches from the dam-supported power grid. The Klamath embodies all that is at stake regarding water issues in the West.

Over the next week, I came to see the Klamath as a tamed, utilitarian river. I drifted past the A Canal, where roughly half the river is siphoned into a massive plumbing project that brings water to 240,000 acres of farmland. I rode returned irrigation effluent through whitewater canyons, and saw the river vanish into reservoirs four different times. Once, it even disappeared into a steel grate, leaving me with a rain-gutter trickle.

During a re-supply stop, I asked an old-timer in a coffee shop what he thought of the dams coming down. Not surprisingly, he said, “It’s not a good idea.” But, he added, “If the fish don’t get their water, they’ll die, so they need it. But a man who has to water his hay, he needs it, too.” Many in this region are now fourth-generation farmers. To them, watering the hay is as inextricably linked to the rhythms of life as swimming upstream is for the salmon.

Two days from the river mouth, I saw the other side of the issue. “Hello, there,” a Yurok Indian called out from the captain’s chair of his fishing boat. “Hello,” I replied, as I paddled near. The man asked me where I’d been, and where I was going. Then he quickly jumped to dam politics.

“There’s a meeting tonight. We’re trying to get those dams outta there,” he said. “Us and the farmers, we’re working side by side right now,” he said. “We told them we wouldn’t sue them, so they’re with us. They don’t like the word sue.” Then he reached the heart of the matter. “They say they’ll go bankrupt without water, but this river — it’s all we’ve got.”

He repeated the same chorus I’ve heard from fisherman on rivers throughout the West Coast: “I only caught 50 fish this spring.” I waited. “Fifty fish!” he repeated. “That’s not many — I have to feed a lot of people.”

As I shoved back into the current, I wished him good luck with the fall salmon run. “Oh, they’ll come back,” he reassured me. I was less optimistic, dams or no dams.

Fish die and go extinct for many reasons, but on the lower Klamath, warm water temperatures are often tagged as the main problem. Warmer water allows for more bacterial pathogens to develop, thus increasing the chances that disease will break out in the fish. Then there are the dams that block fish from reaching their historic spawning beds upriver. This time, there may be a real chance that the Klamath dams will come down. The question for the salmon is whether it will be too late.

Tyler Williams is a contributor to Writers on the Range, a service of High Country News (hcn.org). He lives and writes in Flagstaff, Arizona.

Graton wetlands violated Atascadero dredging haulted by agencies; damages being weighed

by George Snyder
Sonoma West Staff Writer

More Photos...

Graton - A Marin County contractor who allegedly did excavation work in an Atascadero Creek wetland without permits could face fines and potential criminal court action, according to state officials.

The work, which a wetlands activist said was done on a small year round tributary to the creek, was halted June 27 after neighbors of landowner Rob O’Brien lodged several calls to county, state and federal officials about the excavation.

“We got a number of complaints from neighbors about alleged illegal dredging on a tributary of Atascadero creek,” said John Short, a senior engineer with the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Short said a water control board staffer visited the site on a 60-acre parcel purchased by O’Brien in January, as a result of the complaints, which also resulted in the dredge work being halted on June 27.

Short said the landowner would be responsible for paying for the restoration and possible enforcement action including potential fines.

Short said “The first step is for the agencies to come together to see if there is an immediate need for restoration work Š some of the neighbors are afraid that their water tables will be lowered,” Short said, adding “If there is no need for immediate work then we have more time to assess the situation for the best restoration plan and enforcement action.” O’Brien, who was not immediately available for comment, has, in published reports, said he only wanted to clear out a swale to prevent winter flooding and denied harming valuable riparian wildlife habitat along the creek.

A similar case about a mile south on Mill Station Road in 2003 cost an excavator some $1,000 in fines and a six day jail sentence after illegal tree clearing and brush cutting occurred on the creek where it crosses the road.

Officials said at least 200 feet of wetland area, which is near the West County Trail north of Occidental Road, and under the jurisdiction of federal and state laws protecting wetland wildlife habitat, had been disturbed.

“I don’t know if the creek is named, but we went out and documented illegal dredging of surface water, a violation of our own regulations and we did think it was serious. Since then we have been working with other agencies, including Fish and Game, NOAH and the county that have our concerns.”

Neighbors, who have long worked to get the wetland area along the creek preserved, said the dredging was something they had feared for some time.

“I was part of the effort of trying to get this put into open space five years ago,” said Julia Pollock, who lives nearby. “When we heard the property was going up for sale we hoped it would get the ball rolling to protect it, but although the open space district was interested the asking price from the seller was higher than they wanted to pay and so nothing happened.”

She said the property had been bought about a year and a half earlier by from the previous, long-time owner, Harrison Rued, who ran cattle on the land.

“This area and its flora and fauna are unique to this area,” said Pollock, “and if you tried to mitigate it, you couldn’t do it elsewhere. The whole riparian corridor is part of a chain, we were hoping to save it as the next jewel in the crown but it didn’t happen.”