Monthly Archive for February, 2010

Watersheds, Groundwater, and Drinking Water: A Practical Guide

FYI…From the perspective of ‘life-long-learning’ this new book looks
interesting, especially for those of us directly working on such related
efforts?

I have ordered it, but not yet had it in hand…
Brock

Completion and publication of a layperson’s guide to watershed
hydrology and groundwater hydrology.

The book, entitled “Watersheds, Groundwater, and Drinking Water: A Practical
Guide” is geared towards a relatively broad audience with a varied interest
in water and groundwater.

The book will be useful for folks participating in watershed and groundwater
interest groups; for stakeholder groups in industry, agriculture,
environmental organizations, and NGOs; and for water district, irrigation
district, and water utilities personnel without formal college-level
background in hydrology.

It is also useful as a reference in an introductory undergraduate class.

The full-color book is available through UC ANR Communications at
http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/Items/3497.aspx

The book can previewed through Google Books at
http://books.google.com/books/p/anr_publications?id=qfvlzm1A1vMC

The Endowment supported the production of the book with a
contribution of $10,000, which enabled us to print the softcover book
in full color, while keeping the sales prices extremely affordable
($40).

Katy Mamen
Ag Innovations Network
101 Morris St., Suite 212
Sebastopol, CA 95473
Tel: 707.823.6111
Fax: 707.823.6113
katy@aginnovations.org
www.aginnovations.org

Four Anti-CEQA Initiatives

URGENT: Anti-CEQA initiatives URGENT:

The ability of citizens to challenge EIRs is threatened by new
initiatives drive.  I’m not sure if you’ve heard about this, but it should be on your radar.

Four anti-CEQA initiatives have been submitted to the
Attorney General’s office and one or more of them will soon be
circulating for signatures.

The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.
They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.
In part the initiatives read:
…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”
We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:
You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.

They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.

In part the initiatives read:…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”

We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

–California Legislative Analyist
(916) 445-4656
925 L Street, Suite 1000
Sacramento, CA 95814
http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx
<http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx>
– Initiative Coordinator, California Office of the Attorney
General
P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 (916) 445-4752
http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php
<http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php>
– Attorney General’s Office California Department of Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA
94244-2550

In the meantime, we will be reviewing the measures to assess
possible legal vulnerabilities. Stay tuned.

—- from Friends of the Eel River.

Low Impact Development

Low Impact Development -  Create a Hydrologically Functional Lot

LID (low impact development) is an alternative method of land development that seeks to maintain the natural hydrologic character of the site or region. The natural hydrology, or movement of water through a watershed, is shaped over centuries under location-specific conditions to form a balanced and efficient system. When hardened surfaces such as roads, parking lots and rooftops are constructed, the movement of water is altered; in particular, the amount of runoff increases and infiltration decreases. This results in increased peak flow rate and volume, and pollution levels in stormwater runoff. LID designs with nature in mind: working with the natural landscape and hydrology to minimize these changes. LID accomplishes this through source control, retaining more water on the site where it falls, rather than using traditional methods of funneling water via pipes into local waterways. Both improved site design and specific management measures are used in LID designs. LID has been applied to government, residential and commercial development and redevelopment, and has proven to be a cost-efficient and effective method for managing runoff and protecting the environment.

Water Hits and Sticks

Findings Challenge a Century of Assumptions About Soil Hydrology

ScienceDaily (Jan. 23, 2010) – Researchers have discovered that some of the most fundamental assumptions about how water moves through soil in a seasonally dry climate such as the Pacific Northwest are incorrect — and that a century of research based on those assumptions will have to be reconsidered.

A new study by scientists from Oregon State University and the Environmental Protection Agency showed — much to the surprise of the researchers — that soil clings tenaciously to the first precipitation after a dry summer, and holds it so tightly that it almost never mixes with other water.

The finding is so significant, researchers said, that they aren’t even sure yet what it may mean. But it could affect our understanding of how pollutants move through soils, how nutrients get transported from soils to streams, how streams function and even how vegetation might respond to climate change.

The research was just published online in Nature Geoscience, a professional journal.

“Water in mountains such as the Cascade Range of Oregon and Washington basically exists in two separate worlds,” said Jeff McDonnell, an OSU distinguished professor and holder of the Richardson Chair in Watershed Science in the OSU College of Forestry. “We used to believe that when new precipitation entered the soil, it mixed well with other water and eventually moved to streams. We just found out that isn’t true.”

“This could have enormous implications for our understanding of watershed function,” he said. “It challenges about 100 years of conventional thinking.”

What actually happens, the study showed, is that the small pores around plant roots fill with water that gets held there until it’s eventually used up in plant transpiration back to the atmosphere. Then new water becomes available with the return of fall rains, replenishes these small localized reservoirs near the plants and repeats the process. But all the other water moving through larger pores is essentially separate and almost never intermingles with that used by plants during the dry summer.

The study found in one test, for instance, that after the first large rainstorm in October, only 4 percent of the precipitation entering the soil ended up in the stream — 96 percent was taken up and held tightly by soil around plants to recharge soil moisture. A month later when soil moisture was fully recharged, 55 percent of precipitation went directly into streams. And as winter rains continue to pour moisture into the ground, almost all of the water that originally recharged the soil around plants remains held tightly in the soil — it never moves or mixes.

“This tells us that we have a less complete understanding of how water moves through soils, and is affected by them, than we thought we did,” said Renee Brooks, a research plant physiologist with the EPA and courtesy faculty in the OSU Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society.

“Our mathematical models of ecosystem function are based on certain assumptions about biological processes,” Brooks said. “This changes some of those assumptions. Among the implications is that we may have to reconsider how other things move through soils that we are interested in, such as nutrients or pollutants.”

The new findings were made possible by advances in the speed and efficiency of stable isotope analyses of water, which allowed scientists to essentially “fingerprint” water and tell where it came from and where it moved to. Never before was it possible to make so many isotopic measurements and get a better view of water origin and movement, the researchers said.

The study also points out the incredible ability of plants to take up water that is so tightly bound to the soil, with forces nothing else in nature can match.

The research was conducted in the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest near Blue River, Ore., a part of the nation’s Long Term Ecological Research, or LTER Program. It was supported by the EPA.

URGENT: Anti-CEQA initiatives URGENT

The ability of citizens to challenge EIRs is threatened by new initiatives drive. I’m not sure if you’ve heard about this, but it should be on your radar.
Four anti-CEQA initiatives have been submitted to the Attorney General’s office and one or more of them will soon be circulating for signatures.
The proponent is an Orange County developer and he appears to be trying to keep his options open by submitting four separate measures for a ballot title and summary.
DANGER: All the measures would prohibit anyone but the Attorney General from challenging an EIR. Some go further and prohibit even the AG from challenging the adequacy of climate change analysis in EIRs. And two of the versions purport to apply retroactively. We’ve attached copies.
They are titled: “California Jobs and Housing Act (Version 1, 2, 3, 4)” Submitted for Title and Summary on February 03, 2010.
In part the initiatives read:
…”Giving the Attorney General of California the exclusive right to challenge certified EIRs will put an end to hundreds of frivolous lawsuits, which stall job creation and drive up housing prices for California families.” …”Notwithstanding any provision of this division to the contrary, no individual or entity, including without limitation any person as that tenn is defined in Section 21066, other than the Attorney General may commence and maintain any such action or proceeding authorized by this subdivision (c).”
We are hearing that it is important for environmental groups to get involved immediately. Groups can get involved in at least two ways:
You can request a meeting with the Legislative Analyst’s Office, which will review the initiatives for potential fiscal impact. You can also contact the Government Section of the AG’s office, which prepares the initiative’s title & summary. We are told these agencies do want public input.

–California Legislative Analyist

(916) 445-4656
925 L Street, Suite 1000
Sacramento, CA 95814
http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx
<http://www.lao.ca.gov/laoapp/LAOMenus/lao_menu_contact.aspx>
– Initiative Coordinator, California Office of the Attorney
General
P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 (916) 445-4752
http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php
<http://ag.ca.gov/initiatives/contact.php>
– Attorney General’s Office California Department of Justice
Attn: Public Inquiry Unit P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA
94244-2550

In the meantime, we will be reviewing the measures to assess
possible
legal vulnerabilities. Stay tuned.

—- from Friends of the Eel River.

Fresno Judge Halts Protection Plan For Winter Run Chinook

Dan Bacher, Feb 5, 2010

(Fresno) Federal Judge Oliver Wanger on Friday afternoon put a temporary hold on a federal plan (biological opinion) protecting salmon from the fish-killing California Delta pumps that deliver water to corporate agribusiness and southern California.

Chinook Salmon

The ruling, in place for 14 days, allows for unlimited pumping, at least unless the projects hit “take” limits for salmon killed at the pumps or until Delta smelt protections are triggered in the Delta. The ruling can be extended by the judge for 14 more days.

Westlands Water District, the “Darth Vader” of California water politics, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) and other water districts requested the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) so that water exports from the Delta could be increased. The pumping restrictions are designed to protect migrating juvenile winter-run Chinook salmon from being killed in the massive federal and state project pumps.

Endangered winter run Chinook salmon are unique to the Sacramento River system. After migrating for thousands of years to spawn in the McCloud River every year, the run was blocked from migrating to its spawning grounds after the construction of Shasta Dam. Since then, the fish has been forced to spawn in the Sacramento below Keswick Dam and has declined dramatically due to increased Delta water exports, declining water quality, unscreened or poorly screened diversions and other factors.

The positive news is that Wanger ruled for the federal fishery agencies, Earthjustice and NRDC on the Endangered Species Act (ESA) claim. “He ruled that plaintiffs have NOT shown they are likely to succeed on the merits of their claim that the Biological Opinion violates the Endangered Species Act (ESA),” said Barry Nelson, senior water policy analyst from NRDC.

Unfortunately, the judge also ruled that Westlands and the other plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) applies to implementation of the federal biological opinon as he ruled in the delta smelt case, according to Nelson.

“The judge made an erroneous finding of fact that the agencies didn’t consider any alternatives or the impacts on the environment, ” said Nelson. “The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) actually went through the factors, including estimated water supply costs and phased in parts of the RPA (Reasonable and Prudent Alternative) .

“The judge also found that blocking ESA protections won’t cause jeopardy because there aren’t ‘too many’ fish being killed at the pumps – wholly ignoring critical habitat, indirect effects, and the fact that the BO requires all of the components of the RPA to be implemented to avoid jeopardy,” said Nelson.

Following the above “reasoning,” Wanger issued the TRO blocking the salmon biological opinion limitation on Old and Middle River reverse flows below -2,500 to -5,000 cfs. So there are currently no Old and Middle River flow restrictions in place, according to Nelson.

NMFS can come back in to show “more harm” to get the TRO dissolved. Meanwhile, NRDC and EarthJustice are considering their legal options.

“This ruling has enormous implications for the Delta and the fishing industry,” said Nelson. “It also has dramatic implications for the SWP, as my colleague Kate explains here: http://switchboard. nrdc.org/ blogs/kpoole/ is_the_departmen t_of_water_ res.html”

The state’s position is in conflict with other state laws, including regarding salmon protection, as Nelson explains here: http:// switchboard. nrdc.org/ blogs/bnelson/ state_legal_ strategy in_the_de. html.

The ruling also has major implications for The Bay Delta Conservation Plan (BDCP), a plan that many fishing and environmental groups criticize as leading to the construction of a peripheral canal and more dams. “By the way, the judge specificially was comforted by the state’s ‘non-opposition’ to the TRO request,” Nelson observed.

Fishing groups are outraged about the court’s ruling in favor of Westlands at a time that Central Valley salmon populations are in an unprecedented state of collapse. “Fishing families along one thousand miles of U.S. coastline rely on healthy runs of Sacramento River salmon to make a living; they depend on keeping the current salmon protection plan in place,” said Zeke Grader, executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations. “Too much water is being taken from the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta estuary – salmon, fishing families, coastal communities and seafood consumers have paid a heavy price as a result.”

“The shutdown of the California recreational and commercial salmon fishing industry for the last two years has already erased $2.8 billion dollars and 23,000 jobs from our state’s economy,” said Dick Pool, program manager of Water4Fish. “The 2009 adult salmon returns to the Sacramento are almost assured to reach another all- time record low. The past water export practices have been the root cause of this decline. This federal fish restoration plan is the absolute minimum we need to begin a turn around of this decline.”

The Pacific Legal Foundation, a law firm that advocates on behalf of agribusiness and other corporate interests, praised the ruling. “Water is desperately needed in these parts of California, but even though the Golden State has received a substantial amount of precipitation over the past month, the salmon biological opinion has prevented water from getting to where it’s needed most,” the group said on its “Liberty” blog.

“Under today’s decision, however, federal agencies will not be able to implement a significant component of the biological opinion for at least the next 14 days, meaning that much more water will be able to be pumped to California water projects,” the group stated. “Although the harm from the federal government’s ‘fish before people’ policy has been clear to many, some have contended that environmental restrictions aren’t that big of a deal. Today’s decision, however, should put to rest the notion that the man-made, regulatory drought is anything but real.”

The TRO was issued as Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and corporate agribusiness are pushing for the construction of the peripheral canal and a $11.1 billion water bond.

Delta and fish advocates believe that the water bond, combined with the water policy package passed by the California Legislature in November, creates a clear path to the construction of the peripheral canal and Temperance Flats and Sites reservoirs. The canal will cost $23 billion to $53.8 billion to build at a time when California is in its worst economic crisis since the Great Depression – and the budgets for teachers, game wardens, health care for children and state parks have been slashed.

Science Magazine website

In Central California, Coho Salmon Are On The Brink

Greg Miller, Science Magazine, January 2010

The Central California coho salmon was federally listed as endangered in 2006 and the population numbers are still dropping. The historical range of Central California coho salmon once stretched from Punta Gorda in Northern California, south to San Lorenzo River in Central California. Now many Central California coho salmon populations are extirpated or nearly extirpated in several major river basins and across most of their southern range. Northern range populations may face the same fate.

In Lagunitas Creek and its tributaries, just north of San Francisco in Marin County, once home to a thriving coho run, last year’s population surveys revealed a catastrophic decline with only 64 returning adults counted while the estimate for the entire northern range is alarmingly low, at 500 returning adults. Because this is the third year in the coho three-year life cycle, the numbers of spawning adults may be too low to produce enough offspring for species survival. “We truly are at the brink of extinction,” says Charlotte Ambrose, a Recovery Coordinator with the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) in Santa Rosa, California.

The precipitous population decline is due to multiple and compounding factors: dams have blocked access to habitat, thereby reducing spawning sites and offspring, the reduced numbers of offspring then face degraded habitat conditions that further reduce their survival rate. Additionally, ocean conditions off the California coast have reduced the availability of food for the hungry smolts that do make it out of the freshwater habitat, and California’s three-year drought has impeded up-stream and down-stream migrations. There are only two ways we can help the coho: habitat restoration and capture/release programs.

Conserving and improving what’s left of the coho’s habitat is the best hope for the fish’s survival, says Ambrose. A federal species recovery plan to be released next month has identified 28 watersheds, including Lagunitas Creek, where NMFS thinks habitat restoration efforts can have an immediate impact on the coho’s survival. Unfortunately, captivity and release efforts to help coho have at best mixed success rates. “Historically our best guess is that hatcheries have overall had a detrimental effect on salmon populations…due to inbreeding,” says John Carlos Garza, a NMFS geneticist in Santa Cruz. Dwindled populations of fish have a higher rate of inbreeding which leads to lower survival rates in the wild. Habitat restoration thus remains the only real hope of survival for the beleaguered Central Coast coho salmon.

Click here for the Jan. 29 article from Science Magazine.

For additional information on the Central California Coast Coho Salmon click here for the NOAA website

Santa Rosa Groundwater “Recharge”

To All,

One thing you will hear over and over about ground water in the Santa Rosa area is that it is in a “recharge area” . However this paradigm needs to shift. It implies that we can draw from the water resources without consequence because it will always “recharge and come back”. This is not true. What a water recharge area actually is can be greatly varied and un-explained. Some aquifers just dry up. With such little science and information about the county’s primary resource, it is actually quite irresponsible to assume that anyone is actually “managing groundwater”, especially officials tasked to do so.

Lloyd

More Wells Sinking the Central Valley

To All

The consolidation caused by the repeated pumping action of ASR’s (AKA “ground water banking”) causes permanent compression of the formation also. This is the biggest crime of all because the ground water storage capacity is reduced forever. It never comes back.

Lloyd

Hi Don–

The attached jpg file shows the situation in the Central Valley as of 1977–the subsidence at this site was about 36 feet over the time span indicated. It’s worse now.

The man in the photo is Joe Poland, who studied Central Valley groundwater for USGS.

Jane

Hi,
in case this didn’t get posted here yet.

Great quote I hope to hear around this watershed someday…..Don

“We don’t need any more straws going down there ’cause we’re already doing a pretty good job of sucking it dry,” says farmer Dan Errotabere, who has dug three wells as deep as 1,200 feet to irrigate his tomatoes, almonds, and garlic in recent years. “We’re using this water as a last resort, but pretty soon we’re going to need a policy to protect ourselves from ourselves.”

<http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2010/0111/Will-drilling-more-wells-in-California-help-or-hurt>http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2010/0111/Will-drilling-more-wells-in-California-help-or-hurt
Don McEnhill
Russian Riverkeeper
PO Box 1335
Healdsburg, CA 95448
707-433-1958
fx: 707-433-1989
<http://www.russianriverkeeper.org/

Russian Riverkeeper works with the community to advocate, educate, and uphold our environmental laws to ensure the protection and restoration of the Russian River for the health and benefit of all who use and enjoy it.

Take Action on Wastes

To All,

The problem of “waste” in the U.S. is both a local and a federal issue, with the Environmental Protection Agency providing the scientific veneer, among others, for the nation’s profit-at-any-cost, multibillion dollar sewage sludge, garbage, and chemical fertilizer industries. Several decades ago, after public pressure forced corporations and municipalities to stop dumping toxic sewage sludge into the oceans and waterways (it was killing all the fish and marine life and polluting beaches), the EPA decided it was time to rename this hazardous waste “organic fertilizer” (or “biosolids”) and to begin to spread municipal sewage sludge on millions of acres of non-organic farmland and rangeland. Emboldened by their success, EPA and the sludge industry then tried to tell us in 1998 that it would be OK to spread sewage sludge on organic farms as well. Fortunately OCA and the organic community beat them back as part of a massive nationwide grassroots campaign called Save Organic Standards (SOS).

A steady stream of greenwashing and false solutions that encourage waste production instead of waste reduction are coming at us from corporate marketing departments and the federal government. OCA believes that positive action to encourage waste reduction, reuse, recycling and composting (real organic composting, not renaming sewage sludge or industrial waste as compost) is most likely to arise at the local level. Several cities have taken positive actions in the direction of zero waste, but the devil is in the details.

Take household and industrial sewage sludge for example. For decades sewage sludge (the end product of the nation’s thousands of Wastewater Treatment Plants) was dumped in the oceans and rivers, now it is spread on non-organic farms and rangelands, while current industry plans include burning it and turning it into an energy source; but the fundamental problem isn’t what to do with billions of pounds of toxic sewage sludge produced every year (obviously we must isolate and contain it as hazardous waste), but rather how can we stop producing it in the first place. Household sewage, contaminated as it is with chemical cosmetics, toxic household cleaners and any number of pharmaceutical drugs poured into toilets and kitchen sinks, isn’t pristine; but, to paraphrase Bob Hope, it’s not the shit, it’s what we’ve done to it. After the toilet is flushed or the drain is emptied, household waste is funneled into a vast underground sewage system, where it joins a toxic stew of industrial and hospital wastes and rainwater runoff from our streets and highways. Allowing corporations to flood the environment and the waste stream with 100,000 synthetic, mostly toxic chemicals, (most of which end up in sewage sludge), less than 1% of which have ever been proved to be safe for the environment and public health, is a form of insanity. Besides contaminating the water and soil, this irrational so-called “sewage treatment” process wastes enormous amounts of potable water.

At a certain point, cities and towns must come to the realization that using clean water to flush away household waste; engineering rooftops, roadways and streets to funnel rainwater into our sewage systems (instead of capturing it or percolating it back into the soil); and allowing industry and hospitals to discharge toxic chemicals into our wastewater stream just doesn’t make sense. Composting (non-water) toilets, rooftop water catchments and cisterns, and zero discharge of synthetic chemicals potentially or actually proven to hazardous to human health and the environment (the “precautionary principle”) are not fringe ideas, but rather the wave of the future. That is if there is a future.

Human and animal manure, (separated from and free from chemical and pharmaceutical residues), throughout the centuries, and in the present time can and should be safely composted and utilized as a fertilizer on fields, farms, and forests. Although current organic standards prohibit the use of compost derived from human manure (properly composted animal manure is allowed) on food crops, feeding the soil with properly composted “humanure” (or producing methane gas for energy use through bio-digesters) will no doubt become the norm in the future as fossil fuel and water supplies dwindle and chemical fertilizer costs become prohibitive.

Tune in to future issues of Organic Bytes for OCA’s ideas on how we can and must reform our garbage, sludge, and chemical fertilizer industries and put an end to the rampant consumerism that is literally poisoning the planet with garbage and toxic chemical

–Larry