Monthly Archive for October, 2009

Roadkill Observation System

The California Roadkill Observation System
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:25:47 -0700
From: “Shilling, Fraser” <fmshilling@ucdavis.edu>

Friends and Colleagues:

UC Davis’ Road Ecology Center and Information Center for the
Environment invite you to join our cadre of Roadkill Reporters on the
California Roadkill Observation System, at:
<http://wildlifecrossing.ucdavis.edu>http://wildlifecrossing.ucdavis.edu.
Using this web site, you can report roadkills you observe anywhere in
the state, helping all of us to understand the causes of roadkill and
how we can reduce the conflict between animals and vehicles. Roadkill
is a major cause of mortality for many animals in California, but
designing appropriate management responses takes political support,
money, and knowledge of where and how to act. Roadkill data are an
important part of that equation and we invite you, our expert
colleagues, to join us in collecting these data on a public site.

So, <http://wildlifecrossing.ucdavis.edu/>sign up, create an account,
print or download a reporting form, log your observations, and help
reduce the thousands of deaths of wildlife on our highways every
year. If you are very interested in this, please collaborate with us
in improving the site and our research. Also, please consider passing
this along to others who might want to join in through your contact
lists or newsletters.

Thanks from the developers,

Fraser Shilling, Dave Waetjen, & Jim Quinn UC Davis Road Ecology
Center

Scott River Salmon Survey Produces Infection and Dead Fish

To All,

California Department of Fish and Game did a Reconnaissance Survey on the Scott River, September 28, and found many Chinook Salmon infected or dead. Click on the pdf document for photos and more information.

–Larry

Scott River Sept 28 2009 Recon Survey

Klamath Dam Deal Announced, But What’s on Deck?

Klamath Dam Deal Announced, But What’s on Deck?

Dam removal still linked to settlement scheme harmful to fish and wildlife

Steve Pedery, Oregonwild, September 30, 2009

Negotiators from Oregon, California, the U.S. Department of Interior, and the utility company PacifiCorp released a final draft today of a plan to remove four aging dams on the Klamath River. The draft dam removal deal has yet to be signed by a broader group of stakeholders, and negotiations continue on an unbalanced water settlement linked to the dam removal proposal. The combined agreements will eventually require Congressional action to go into effect.

“For years now, there has been a growing consensus that removing Klamath River dams is key to salmon recovery and overall Klamath Basin health,” said Ani Kame’enui with the conservation group Oregon Wild. “Sadly, this proposal still saddles dam removal efforts with unrelated special interest giveaways.”

The Klamath Hydropower Settlement Agreement (KHSA) anticipates dam removal to begin at an unspecified future date with a feasibility study to be conducted before a 2012 deadline. Independent analyses have already documented much of the economic and ecological rationale behind dam removal, making the added studies and delayed timeline worrisome. Furthermore, under the terms of the KHSA, PacifiCorp can continueto profit from dam operations with minimal interim conditions to fix poor water quality and aid struggling salmon.

Even more controversial is the linkage between the KHSA and the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA), a nearly $1 billion water deal drafted over the last six years and heavily influenced by former Bush administration officials. KBRA negotiations have proceeded in secret since a draft document was released tothe public in January of 2008. The settlement scheme would guarantee water for commercial agriculture inthe Bureau of Reclamation’s Klamath Irrigation Project without providing a similar guarantee to threatened fish species. The KBRA would also lock in damaging commercial agriculture on 22,000 acres of land inside the Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuges.

“The dam deal announced today isn’t perfect, but the true test is still to come,” added Steve Pedery, conservation director with Oregon Wild and a veteran Klamath advocate. “When the water deal gets packaged with this dam deal, are river advocates going to be able to live with the fish and wildlife sacrifices made in the final settlement. We all want dam removal, but we shouldn’t have to trade salmon and bald eagles for broken concrete.”

Today’s dam removal proposal comes nearly a year after PacifiCorp first agreed to consider the potential of breaching the dams. In the interim, negotiators missed two self-imposed deadlines to reach a final agreement. Iron Gate, Copco I, Copco II, and J.C. Boyle dams continue to operate on annual licenses with minimal interim conditions required to improve habitat for fish. The furthest downstream dam on the river, Iron Gate, was constructed in 1962 without fish passage and has blocked over 300 miles of salmon spawning habitat ever since. The decline in salmon population health on the Klamath reached its low point in 2002 when approximately 70,000 adult salmon died due to water quality and quantity issues created in part bythe dams.

“The last thing that anyone wants to see if another devastating fish kill on the Klamath,” concluded Kame’enui. “If the dam deal and the water deal aren’t significantly changed for the better, we may not be able to avoid that fate.”

Russian River Instream Flow and Restoration

Public Policy Facilitating Committee Meeting for the Russian River Section 7 Consultation
Date:  Thursday, October 29
Time:  1:00-3:00 p.m.Public Meeting
Location:  Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chambers, 575 Administration Drive, Santa Rosa, CA
The Public Policy Facilitating Committee (PPFC) meets to discuss, disseminate information and take public comment on the implementation of Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act as called for in a Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service and the Sonoma County Water Agency.
For more information, contact Ann DuBay at 707.524.8378.

Public Policy Facilitating Committee Meeting for the Russian River Section 7 Consultation

Date:  Thursday, October 29

Time:  1:00-3:00 p.m.Public Meeting

Location:  Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chambers, 575 Administration Drive, Santa Rosa, CA

The Public Policy Facilitating Committee (PPFC) meets to discuss, disseminate information and take public comment on the implementation of Section 7 of the federal Endangered Species Act as called for in a Memorandum of Understanding with the United States Army Corps of Engineers, National Marine Fisheries Service and the Sonoma County Water Agency.

Biological Opinion: Dr Hearn

SCWA updates: Pam Jeane, David Manning, Jessica Martini-Lamb, Ann DuBay, Grant Davis

US Army Corp Update: Lt. Colonel Farrell

Public Comments

Adjourn

For more information, contact Ann DuBay at 707.524.8378.

Stakeholder Negotiation Leads to Deal to Remove Four Salmon-killing Dams on the Klamath River in Oregon and California

Congratulations to the twenty-six negotiating parties – including tribal people, farmers, fishermen, conservation groups, state and federal governments – who recently reached an agreement to remove four dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon. When the Klamath dams come down, it will be the biggest dam removal project the world has ever seen.

Iron Gate Dam in Norther California

Iron Gate Dam in Northern California

The Klamath River, like the Columbia-Snake, has been the subject of an intense debate over how we manage our rivers in the face of competing demands. In this case, for irrigation for farms, for the generation of electricity, and for critical habitat for salmon and other fish and wildlife, and the businesses, communities, and cultures that depend upon them.

The Klamath River area is the ancestral home for a number of tribes, including the Hoopa and Yurok, who revere salmon as a healthy, traditional food and a powerful inspiration for their community and culture. It is today also the home of a numerous endangered fish, and it was the extremely depressed adult salmon returns that triggered a multi-year fishing closure off the coast of California and Oregon several years ago. It was also the scene of political meddling by then-Vice President Dick Cheney in 2004, when too much water was allocated to farmers, leaving too little water in the river that resulted in a massive die-off of 35,000 adult salmon that perished before they reached their spawning gravels.

Years of litigation and controversy politicized science and most recently, diverse stakeholder negotiations, have led to a tentative deal that includes the removal of the Klamath River’s most lethal salmon-killing dams. While a number of critical steps remain to be taken, and despite the fact that dam removal is not expected to commence before 2020, this deal is an encouraging sign of what can occur when people sit down together to face and resolve common problems.

After nearly two decades of litigation and controversy and debate, it is time for the same type of negotiation process to resolve the salmon-energy-transportation issues in the Columbia-Snake River basin. Unfortunately, in its first opportunity to make progress for salmon and rivers and communities affected by the knot of problems in the Columbia Basin, the Obama Administration struck out. Judge Redden will be coming up to bat next. Stay tuned!

Opinion: Klamath Agreement Helps Dam Owners, Not Fish

Leonard Masten, Sacramento Bee October 18, 2009

As chairman of the Hoopa Valley Tribe, I was sadly struck by the reality of Rex Rabin’s Oct. 6 political cartoon depicting one dying salmon telling another, “Dams on the Klamath are coming down! Pass it on.”

This scene of mass salmon death in the water-starved Klamath River and its largest tributary, the Trinity River, could be a recollection of the 2002 fish kill of 68,000 spawning salmon that did not get enough water. The cartoon also could predict the future if the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement announced by Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar on Sept. 30 is implemented as written.

The Bee’s Oct. 4 editorial, “Klamath pact could be a start toward peace,” said the agreement will, “simultaneously help fish and farmers.” I disagree. This agreement has so many loopholes and delays that naturally spawning salmon in the Klamath and Trinity rivers may be dead before one brick is removed from the dams.

The agreement proclaims good goals, but gives the owners of the dams, PacifiCorp, more time to devise legal and legislative plans to stall the removal of the dams until they are exonerated from liability and paid generously by taxpayers. The years of Klamath settlement talks came only after PacifiCorp realized they were on the verge of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s order to put expensive fish ladders at the four turn-of-last-century dams.

Our reservation has the Klamath and Trinity rivers flowing through it. We hope the agreement will help the salmon, but although we have been part of the negotiations we must dissent until more salmon protections are incorporated in the agreement.

No other tribe has spent more time and money defending the Trinity River. The other “environmental” negotiators in the settlement who have embraced this agreement should focus less on the desirability of agreement, and more on objective, good science for the rivers. Agreement should come only after the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement can protect fish in these rivers. We must fight, if even alone, because this is our home and our culture.

The Bee’s editorial noted that “critics are missing the big picture.” When it comes to the big picture our tribe has given decades and millions of dollars to river restoration. We have fished salmon from the Trinity River for thousands of years. The river and the fish are part of us. We don’t have another ancestral homeland to move to. The salmon do not have another river to spawn in.

Leonard Masten is chairman of the Hoopa Valley Tribe.

Climate Change 350 Success!

Dear friend,
Today in New York was one of the most amazing experiences of my life.
As I stood in Times Square and watched images flood in from every corner of the world on the big screens, I finally saw what a climate movement looked like — and it looked diverse and creative and beautiful.
A Note About Photo Uploads
If you haven’t done so already, please send your action pictures to photos@350.org so we can share your story–with the media, with world leaders, and with our entire network on our website’s slideshow on the homepage of www.350.org
Here’s how your photo-submission e-mail should look:
Subject: City, Country
Body: Photo description/caption–please include the location of the photo and include a photographer’s credit if necessary.
If you have video from your action, please visit www.350.org/video-upload so we can incorporate it into a final video that sums up the story of this amazing day.
Please head to www.350.org and spend a few minutes watching the pictures. We need you to feel the strength of this movement, and to see how creative and committed this movement is, all across the planet.
It was so sweet to watch the day move around the globe, with thousands upon thousands of pictures appearing, sometimes a dozen a minute! There were photos of climbers high on the glaciers of Switzerland holding 350 banners, of bicycle parades from Copenhagen to San Francisco, of organizers in Papua New Guinea beating their church gong 350 times while churches in Barcelona rang their bells 350 times. Photos of activists protesting coal plants and celebrating wind farms, of students in 350 shirts repairing their flooded homes in Manila, and of thousands of people marching in the streets of Bogota and Kathmandu. Photos of people from different races and classes, religions and nationalities, coming together around a simple and powerful number to save our planet. Thousands took to the streets in Addis Ababa and Mexico City; we had huge parades in places like Togo and Seattle.
You were by far the biggest news story on Google, on CNN, on the front pages of newspapers around the planet.  And these pictures were seen around the world, in newspapers from Beijing to Boston, on TV stations from New Delhi to New York, and on blogs, social networks, and websites across the internet.
Together, we’ve shown the world that a global climate movement is possible and set a bold new agenda for the upcoming United Nations Climate Meetings in Copenhagen this December. The 350 target is the new bottom line for climate action and world leaders must now meet that target.
We thought we would be tired after many sleepless nights planning this day, but in fact we’re more energized than ever. We’re preparing to deliver the photos and messages from your events to every national delegation to the United Nations on Monday, and planning to hand the photos to high-level ministers at upcoming climate negotiations in Barcelona and Copenhagen. So if you haven’t uploaded your best pictures from the event yet, please do so right away by sending us an e-mail to photos@350.org with your photos attached, with your City, Country as the subject and the body as the action description.
Thank you more than we can possibly say. We’ll (of course) be asking you to do lots more in the weeks ahead — but today, lean back, relax, look through pictures at 350.org, and savor your accomplishment. You were part of what many journalists called “the most widespread day of political action the world has ever seen.”

Dear friend,

Today in New York was one of the most amazing experiences of my life.

As I stood in Times Square and watched images flood in from every corner of the world on the big screens, I finally saw what a climate movement looked like — and it looked diverse and creative and beautiful.

If you haven’t done so already, please send your action pictures to photos@350.org so we can share your story–with the media, with world leaders, and with our entire network on our website’s slideshow on the homepage of www.350.org

If you have video from your action, please visit www.350.org/video-upload so we can incorporate it into a final video that sums up the story of this amazing day.

Please head to www.350.org and spend a few minutes watching the pictures. We need you to feel the strength of this movement, and to see how creative and committed this movement is, all across the planet.

It was so sweet to watch the day move around the globe, with thousands upon thousands of pictures appearing, sometimes a dozen a minute! There were photos of climbers high on the glaciers of Switzerland holding 350 banners, of bicycle parades from Copenhagen to San Francisco, of organizers in Papua New Guinea beating their church gong 350 times while churches in Barcelona rang their bells 350 times. Photos of activists protesting coal plants and celebrating wind farms, of students in 350 shirts repairing their flooded homes in Manila, and of thousands of people marching in the streets of Bogota and Kathmandu. Photos of people from different races and classes, religions and nationalities, coming together around a simple and powerful number to save our planet. Thousands took to the streets in Addis Ababa and Mexico City; we had huge parades in places like Togo and Seattle.

You were by far the biggest news story on Google, on CNN, on the front pages of newspapers around the planet.  And these pictures were seen around the world, in newspapers from Beijing to Boston, on TV stations from New Delhi to New York, and on blogs, social networks, and websites across the internet.

Together, we’ve shown the world that a global climate movement is possible and set a bold new agenda for the upcoming United Nations Climate Meetings in Copenhagen this December. The 350 target is the new bottom line for climate action and world leaders must now meet that target.

We thought we would be tired after many sleepless nights planning this day, but in fact we’re more energized than ever. We’re preparing to deliver the photos and messages from your events to every national delegation to the United Nations on Monday, and planning to hand the photos to high-level ministers at upcoming climate negotiations in Barcelona and Copenhagen. So if you haven’t uploaded your best pictures from the event yet, please do so right away by sending us an e-mail to photos@350.org with your photos attached, with your City, Country as the subject and the body as the action description.

Thank you more than we can possibly say. We’ll (of course) be asking you to do lots more in the weeks ahead — but today, lean back, relax, look through pictures at 350.org, and savor your accomplishment. You were part of what many journalists called “the most widespread day of political action the world has ever seen.”

Together with millions around the world, you made a real difference already — get ready to make much more in the days, weeks and months to come.

With hope,

Bill McKibben and the whole 350.org Team

Action to Take for Climate Change

Dear Friends,

This Saturday October 24th is www.350.org’s International Day of Climate Action.

Here’s an easy action to take, that in my mind is the best thing anyone can do to stop global warming.

California has convened an Economic and Allocations Advisory Committee (EAAC) to write a report on how to allocate GHG emissions permits under the state’s AB32 cap.  The EAAC website is http://www.climatechange.ca.gov/eaac/index.html.  Billions of dollars are at stake.  Will it go to utilities, government, or people?  Let them know what you think.  Here’s how.

Copy the following text and send it in an email to:

eaac@calepa.ca.gov (and bcc to mike@carbonshare.org)

For the Public Record

Dear EAAC,

I support the State’s investments into renewable energy and low-emissions vehicles.  Such investments should continue through the regular legislative process.  We need to reduce greenhouse gases fairly, and return profits back to people if prices go up.  The majority of emissions value should be returned directly back to us, the people of California.  Do not make our money disappear into the black hole of deficit reduction. Do not give free allocations to utilities on our behalf.  Do not give tax cuts to corporations that are lobbying against climate protection through their Chambers of Commerce, or to their millionaire shareholders who may live outside the state.  Recycling the revenues back to us will help the people of California buy solar panels, hybrid cars, pay for increased energy bills, and do our part to stimulate the economy and reduce our state’s carbon footprint.  California can lead the world with a system based on democratic principles: One person – One share.  If we do it right, our AB32 law can influence the pending bill in Congress and the international climate talks in Copenhagen.  Thank you.

Sincerely,

Fishermen, Salmon Stakeholders Take to Capitol Hill, Lobby for Snake River Salmon Recovery and River Restoration

On October 5, a group of salmon stakeholders from across the nation will take to the halls of Congress to urge representatives to support the Salmon Solutions and Planning Act (SSPA; H.R. 3503). The bill would provide Congress and federal agencies with up-to-date, thorough information about how best to protect and restore wild salmon and steelhead in the Pacific Northwest’s Columbia and Snake River Basin.

Fish before the Capitol

“We’re talking about much more than a fish here, this is my job and thousands of others, it’s an iconic species and a way of life. The Obama administration missed the opportunity to take on this challenge and restore a river, recover healthy salmon and steelhead populations, and protect our jobs and salmon economy,” said Jeff Hickman, a Northwest steelhead guide and Regional Conservation Organizer for the Sierra Club. “Yeah, we’re disappointed, but we have hope and that’s why we’re here. There is strong support in the region for a bold solution to this crisis and we don’t have the time for more political side-stepping. We need to meet this challenge head on, and that starts with the studies and actions in this bill.” See Hickman’s message to President Obama about Snake River salmon recovery.

Hickman joined more than 115 outdoor and fishing business leaders in a letter asking Congress to act on legislation that will help bring about a durable resolution to the long-standing challenge of salmon recovery. Patagonia, an outdoor clothing company based in Ventura, Calif. spearheaded the letter.

“Conservation is a core priority for the outdoor industry, and wild salmon play an important role in the recreation economy. We simply can’t afford to lose them,” said Lisa Pike-Sheehy, Patagonia’s Director of Environmental Initiatives. “We need updated, comprehensive and unbiased information so we can evaluate, on a level playing field, all potential salmon recovery options, including lower Snake River dam removal. We applaud the members of Congress supporting this bill.” Patagonia has long supported restoring a free-flowing Snake River to recover salmon and recently featured Snake River sockeye in their Freedom to Roam Campaign.

The solutions legislation comes at an opportune time. Last month, the Obama administration adopted a flawed Bush administration Columbia-Snake salmon plan. While the fate of that plan is in the hands of a U.S. District Court judge, the salmon community is not waiting to push for Congressional solutions to protect and recover Snake River populations.

Salmon stakeholders will be in D.C. Monday, Oct. 5 to Wednesday, Oct. 7 and available for interviews.

Please contact Emily Nuchols, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it or 360.510.8696 if you would like to speak with a spokesperson listed below:

Dustin Aherin:
President of Citizens for Progress,
from Lewiston, ID

Dave Bitts:
Veteran Commercial Fisherman & President of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, from McKinleyville, CA (near Eureka)

Rick Ege:
Executive Director of the New Jersey State Council of Trout Unlimited, from Budd Lake, NJ

Jeff Hickman:
Northwest Steelhead Fishing Guide and Hunter/Angler Outreach Organizer for the Sierra Club, from Portland, OR

Greg Stahl:
Assistant Policy Director of Idaho Rivers United, from Boise, ID

Hannah Stauts:
Mayor of Stanley and the youngest mayor in America at the time of her election two years ago, from Stanley, ID

VIEWPOINT: Obama’s Salmon Plan just Repackages Bush’s failed Effort

Glen Spain, October 17, 2009

Unlike as optimistically characterized by Steve Wright, administrator of the Bonneville Power Administration, in his Oct. 10 guest viewpoint, “Right plan can save salmon and the hydroelectric dams,” the Northwest’s Columbia River salmon problems are far from over, and the battle to prevent their extinction is far from won.

On Sept. 14, the Obama administration delivered its own much anticipated salmon strategy for the Columbia and Snake rivers. Unfortunately, after a four-month review, Obama’s salmon team has merely adopted the previously rejected Bush administration salmon plan as its own, with only a few minor improvements.

Worst of all, the Bush-turned-Obama plan just embraces failed recovery goals of the past. Keeping expectations low, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration chief Jane Lubchenco assures us the plan will “prevent further declines.” In other words, ratepayers and taxpayers all up and down the West Coast will remain on the hook for roughly $1 billion a year for at least the next 10 years to — at best — merely maintain Columbia Basin wild salmon at their already seriously imperiled levels.

In other words, like the Bush plan, the Obama strategy does not even aspire to actually rebuild the 13 threatened and endangered Columbia River salmon and steelhead populations to healthy and fishable levels. The new plan, like the old one, still leaves West Coast fishermen, and most of the West Coast salmon fishing industry, heading straight for the rocks. Talk about a “jobless recovery.”

The Bush administration took special care to ignore and bury science. Unfortunately, the Obama administration’s modified plan is little different — it even rolls back the court-ordered protections such as “spill” that we fought hard to put into place, which BPA resisted, and which have since proven effective; it ignores the clear science of state, federal, and tribal fishery biologists; and it radically redefines the jeopardy standard of the Endangered Species Act — weakening the core values of the law.

Wright also claims that this salmon plan is the work of unprecedented collaboration and has broad regional support. Then why were fishermen, whose jobs and communities are on the line, deliberately excluded? For an administration so set on protecting and restoring jobs, this status-quo plan is a huge mistake — a death sentence for salmon and fishermen, not the road to recovery.

Attention has focused on long-term contingencies included in Obama’s plan, particularly potential consideration of lower Snake River dam removal should populations truly fall off the cliff. At best, however, this would be many years down the road when the populations, already threatened and endangered, are even closer to extinction. And even then, they’re just “planning to plan.” It’s like waiting to call the fire department until your house is already 80 percent burned. This gives no guarantee of life-saving help.

Wright’s “green vs. dirty power” argument also simply does not hold water. There is no need to replace power from the four lower Snake River dams with the dirtiest possible power alternative. Many studies have shown how replacing hydropower from the dams with equally “green” power elsewhere would be both effective and far cheaper than building more coal plants.

The continued uncertainty that this decision perpetuates is bad for the Northwest, will delay progress, and will continue to destroy jobs and jeopardize salmon communities from southeast Alaska to Northern California.

Change in the Snake River may be expensive, but doing nothing has already been far more so. Already the Northwest salmon economy has lost more than 25,000 family-wage jobs, and at least $500 million every year, because of widespread salmon collapses in the Columbia Basin.

Even if, as Wright claims, it may cost as much as $500 million a year to replace the power from the Snake River dams, as compared with the approximately $1 billion a year it is going to cost us under the Obama plan to do little more than gold-plate the dams, with no assurance of recovery — then the price for taking down the Snake River dams would be the best deal in town.

Glen Spain is the Northwest regional director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, the West Coast’s largest organization of commercial fishing families. His office is in Eugene.