Monthly Archive for July, 2009

Support a Water Protection and Reinvestment Trust Fund!

Protect and Strengthen Our Public Water – Support a Water Protection and Reinvestment Trust Fund!


July 28, 2009


Dear Activists,

Our water and wastewater infrastructure is in desperate need of repair.  The American Society of Civil Engineers has given both systems a D- grade.  In order to protect our essential water resources, create tens of thousands of green jobs, and safeguard public health, join us in urging Congress to create a permanent and dedicated federal funding source!

On July 15, 2009, Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR-3) introduced H.R.3202, which would create such a trust fund. While the bill is excellent in many respects, it should be strengthened to ensure public dollars go to public water systems, not to subsidize corporate profits of private water companies. By signing below, you can show your support for a Water Protection and Reinvestment Trust Fund that protects and strengthens our publicly owned water and wastewater systems.

Urge Your Congressperson to Support The Water Protection and Reinvestment Trust Fund by Signing Below!

Sincerely,


Wenonah Hauter

Executive Director
Food & Water Watch

FOER’s Comments on North Bay Water Recycling Program

July 20, 2009

Marc Bautista
Sonoma County Water Agency
PO Box 11628
Santa Rosa, CA 95406-1628
By Email: info@nbwra.org
Marc.Bautista@scwa.ca.gov

Re: North Bay Water Recycling Program Draft EIR and Draft EIS

Dear Mr. Bautista:

Attached are comments on the NBWRA Project DEIR/EIS from Friends of the
Eel River. Reference materials will follow in a second email.

We are looking forward to a comprehensive and effective response.

Sincerely,

David Keller
Bay Area Director
Friends of the Eel River
1327 I St.
Petaluma, CA 94952
(707) 763-9336

NBWRA DEIR-DEIS FOER Comments 7-20-09 Final

CCWI’s Workshop Creek Cleanup and Bugs, August 1

Hello there!

On August 1, Community Clean Water Institute (CCWI) is proud to present a fun and hands-on workshop for teens and adults in conjunction with CHOP’s Teen Center and the Sonoma State University Entomology Outreach program.

Meet at 10 am at the Pierson Street Bridge Santa Rosa (near the crossing of 6th Street and Pierson) for a creek cleanup and bug hunting, followed by lunch down the street at CHOP’s teen center at 12 noon and an indoor presentation with live specimens and university quality microscopes!

For more info check www.firstsaturdaycleanup.org or contact CCWI’s office at 824-4370

Please bring a water bottle, and dress appropriately with sturdy shoes and sunscreen

Hope to see you there,

Terrance Fleming

Program Director

Community Clean Water Institute

(707) 824-4370

terrance@ccwi.org

Bush Era Plan to Clearcut Oregon Forests Cancelled!

WOPR Canceled – Obama Administration Cancels Bush Era Plan to Clearcut Oregon Forests Salmon, clean water, and old-growth forests big winners

Portland, OR  — People throughout the west celebrated an Obama administration decision to cancel a Bush era plan that would have nearly quadrupled current logging on public lands in western Oregon.  The Bush plan, called the Western Oregon Plan Revision, or WOPR, rezoned 2.6 million acres of federal public forests in Oregon managed by the Bureau of Land Management.  The announcement came in response to a lawsuit filed by thirteen conservation and fisheries protection organizations challenging the Bush logging plan.  Obama administration officials said the Bush plan illegally ignored requirements to protect endangered species living in the forests and could not be defended in court.

The decision to cancel the massive timber giveaway conforms with numerous scientific studies concluding that dramatic increases in logging would have harmed clean water and healthy streams, pushed wildlife toward extinction, and contributed to global warming.  The plan to clearcut 500 million board feet of timber per year would also have destroyed much of Oregon’s remaining old-growth forests.

“It’s a good day for the wildlife and wild places that make Oregon so special,” said Doug Heiken of Oregon Wild.  “It’s also a good day for all the businesses up and down the Oregon coast that depend on visitors from all over the world who come here to catch a salmon or see what a real Northwest forest is supposed to look like.”

“The Obama administration finally listened to what our best scientists have been desperately trying to say about the need to protect our irreplaceable natural resources,” said Joseph Vaile of the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center based in southwest Oregon.

Today’s announcement aligns the Obama administration squarely with the wishes of the public which opposed the Bush clearcutting plan by over 90 percent.

“Southwest Oregon has much of the lands that were to be clearcut under the WOPR.  We are pleased that level heads have prevailed, and our old growth will be protected,” said Shane Jimerfield, Siskiyou Project.

“Instead of a sea of stumps, we will now have healthy forests, healthy streams and salmon, and a rebounding economy,” said Kristen Boyles, an attorney with Earthjustice.  “We’re grateful that our citizens’ legal challenge could stop this plan until the Obama administration was in place to listen to the people and follow America’s environmental laws.”

“Today’s announcement means many important salmon protections will be preserved in what are the last, best spawning and rearing areas for salmon on public lands,” commented Glen Spain, for the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), one of the co-plaintiffs and a major commercial fishing organization.  “This announcement is good news for hard working commercial fishing families struggling to survive on salmon runs nearly ruined by decades of excessive logging.”

“The forests and species of northwestern California are connected to the rest of our regional old-growth forests through BLM land in southern Oregon,” said Scott Greacen of EPIC.  “Today’s announcement basically restores the southern half of the Northwest Forest Plan.”

“Intact old growth forests with clean healthy streams are an economic engine that really drives Oregon’s prosperity, and it is encouraging to see that the Obama Administration recognizes the amazing values our ancient forests provide other than timber extraction,” stated Bob Freimark of The Wilderness Society.

Chuck Willer, Executive Director of the Coast Range Association, said, “The Obama administration has just saved the best remaining native forest in the northern third of Oregon’s Coast Range region.  This is a gift to tomorrow’s children for a region in short supply of old growth forest and quality salmon habitat.”

“The highest and best use of these forests is for carbon storage, water quality, salmon and wildlife habitat,” said Randi Spivak, National Center for Conservation Science and Policy.

“The Obama administration’s move today signals a return to scientific management of our public forests and marks an important step towards protecting Oregon’s remaining mature and old growth forests from unsustainable logging and roadbuilding,” said Ivan Maluski, Conservation Coordinator for the Oregon Chapter of the Sierra Club. “These last wild forests protect the climate, produce clean water, and sustain world class salmon runs and recreational opportunities that contribute to Oregon’s diverse economy.”

The announcement comes in response to a lawsuit filed by Earthjustice challenging the now discredited Bush logging plan. Earthjustice represents Oregon Wild, Siskiyou Project, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, The Wilderness Society, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Center for Biological Diversity, EPIC, Umpqua Watersheds, American Lands Alliance, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Greenpeace, Coast Range Association, and Sierra Club.

To learn more about the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area and the campaign to protect it visitwww.Siskiyou.org/swrc

Thank you,

Shane Jimerfield

Beach and Clean Water Restoration Act Approved

Beach Act Reauthorization Bill and Clean Water Restoration Act Approved by EPW Committee!

The Beach Act Reauthorization bill (S. 878), now called the Clean Coastal Environment and Public Health Act, and a compromise Clean Water Resotration Act (S. 787) were both marked up by the Senate committee on Environment and Public Works and approved. Additionally, the Sewage Overflow Community Right-to-Know Act (S. 937), the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act (S. 479) and the Contaminated Sedment Remediation Reauthorization Act (S. 933, Great Lakes Legacy Act) were also considered by the committee and were passed on to the Senate floor. The full Senate will now consider these bills.

These are great steps forward, but there is still much work to be done to ensure they all get through the whole Senate!

The Water Protection and Reinvestment Act of 2009

FYI,

The Water Protection and Reinvestment Act of 2009

Yesterday Congressman Earl Blumenaeur (OR)  introduced, The Water Protection and Reinvestment Act of 2009, in Congress. The bill would establish a water protection and reinvestment fund to support investment in clean water and drinking water infrastructure. Today at 2 pm, the U.S. House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee will hold a hearing to discuss the merits of the legislation. CWN Board Treasurer Dereth Glance, representing Citizens Campaign for the Environment (NY & CT), will testify on the bill.

To obtain a copy of Dereth’s testimony and Clean Water Network’s official Board position on establishing a national clean water trust fund click HERE.

–Larry

New Threat To North Coast Forest And Rivers

State Water Board Chair proposes to take traditional timber harvest management tools (Waste Discharge Reporting and Conditional Waivers for same) away from Regional Board

Problem – Current Status of North Coast Rivers

California North Coast Hydrologic Region Map

Almost all north coast rivers are listed as impaired – that is they do not meet Water Quality Standards. These impairments are the basic reason for the collapse of the salmon fishery on the north coast. The fundamental reason for impairment by the pollutants sediment, temperature, low dissolved oxygen, and nutrients, is in appropriate land use practices – mostly from timber harvest operations (see background – CZMA) and poor agricultural practices. On most of the listed impaired north coast rivers timber harvest is by far the most dominant land use and is the primary cause of impairment.

The North Coast Regional Board has taken action to control pollutants and address timber harvest issue via use of a Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge and/or Waste Discharge Reporting. This Conditional Waiver sets minimum stream protection standards and, when complied with, negates the need for Waste Discharge Reporting.

Adding to the Problem: The State Water Board seeks to take responsibility away from the North Coast Regional Board and write State Wide Conditional Waivers and WDRs – to be administered by the State Water Board and/or the Department of Forestry (under State Water Board Authority).

Scientific Record

State Agency (CDF, State Water Resources Control Board, North Coast Regional Board, and Department of Fish and Game) and Federal Agency (NOAA and EPA) have all commissioned several extensive studies (some with timber industry participation) on the effectiveness of the Forest Practice Rules as administered by the California Department of Forestry. The overwhelming evidence (without dispute) shows that the FPRs, as administered by CDF, do not protect the beneficial uses of water.

State Responsibility

Under State Water Code and federal statute (Clean Water Act, Coastal Zone Management Act, ESA) the State is obligated to use its regulatory authority to take actions necessary to protect and recover Water Quality Standards on these impaired north coast rivers. These authorities and actions include: Amendments to the Basin Plan (Water Quality Control Plan/Implementing Programs) Total Maximum Daily Loads, Waste Discharge Reporting (and related Conditional Waivers for same – that include operational standards to protect the resource), Citation, Clean-up and Abatement Orders, Cease and Desist Orders, and Administrative Civil Liabilities. Historically and reasonably all of these authorities have been administered by the Regional Board(s).

Actions Taken by the North Coast Regional Board

The North Coast Regional Board has approved one TMDL, the Garica River- 2002, that has shown to be enforceable and effective. This TMDL has shown to be a great success. More current TMDLs that were written to lesser enforceable standards on the Scott and Shasta Rivers are more problematic.

The North Coast Regional Board has been in process for several years in the Development of Basin Plan Amendments (with prohibitions) for the control of sediment and stream and wetland protection (as part of the Non-point Source Control Program). As yet no action has been taken.

To address pollutant threat from timber operations the North Coast Regional Board has developed a Conditional Waiver for Waste Discharge Reporting (both, on federal and non-federal lands). The Conditional Waiver sets minimum standards for stream protection (beneficial use protection) related to timber operations. Timber operations not meeting the Conditional Waiver Standards must be subject to Waste Discharge Reporting.

State Water Board to Change Process.

Due to complaints from the Forest Service, the timber industry, and the Department of Forestry (CDF claims usurpation of their rightful authority to administer Timber Harvest Plans – where CDF would subordinate all participation by the Regional Board and the Department of Fish and Game), the current State Board Chair has indicated that Timber Harvest Waste Discharge Reporting and Waiver Conditions, and management of same, should be reorganized and administered (more centrally on a state wide basis) by the State Water Board. This change of course appears politically based rather than resource protective. The State Board might try to justify such changes as cost saving, providing statewide uniform regulation, elimination of duplication of work, and permit streamlining. There are arguments that can be presented to refute any and all justification made by the Board.

Arguments Against State Water Board Proposed Action

Proposed Action is not consistent with Certification of the Timber Harvest Review Process as a Certified Regulatory Program: The Timber Harvest Review Process was approved as a Certified Regulatory Program (as an abbreviated CEQA process) on the basis that the program would be multi- deciplinary (inclusive of Regional Board and Department of Fish and Game recommendations on projects). In actual practice. CDF as lead agency, has been less than open to accepting recommendations as part of the Timber Harvest Plan Review process. This is one reason major for the failure of this process to protect water quality values in timber harvest activity. The proposed action by the State Water Board would diminish the status of the multi-disciplinary approach.

Proposed Action is not consistent with Z’berg-Nejedly Act: Z’berg-Nejedly, the authorizing legislation for the Forest Practice Act, assumed the context of the multi-disciplinary review team – as an abbreviated CEQA environmental review process. Allowing one agency to dominate the whole process in inappropriate and leads to bad results. The Forest Practice Act, and Rules, state that all Timber Harvest Plans must be consistent with the Applicable Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan). Who better to interpret the Basin Plan For The North Coast, as applied to a project (Timber Harvest Plan) than the Regional Board.? The Department of Forestry, nor the State Water Board, have the knowledge or expertise to determine Basin Plan conformance.

Proposed Action is not consistent with the Coastal Zone Management Act (Re- authorization /CZARA): The State has contractual responsibility with EPA and NOAA to address control of non-point pollutant source responsibility, including pollutant input from timber harvest activity, under State regulatory authority. (See CZARA analysis below). Altering and reducing Regional Board authority to deal with timber harvest activity, as proposed by this State Board action, works against the State’s ability to perform and control pollutant impacts from timber harvest activity.

Argument for Considering Regional Variability: Forests and rivers function differently in different areas of the State. Sierra forests, rivers, and soils respond to management very differently than coastal temperate rain forests and soil types. These differences point out the necessity to manage forest practices and related effects regionally – not from Sacramento – and nut under one Waste Discharge Permit or Conditional Waiver.

The North Coast Regional Board has been working on timber harvest issues in the region for the last 20 years. In the last 7, or so, years the issue have become more paramount. Regional Board staff is educated in the regional land conditions, stream conditions, regional timber industry conditions, and other variable (including interpretation of the Basin Plan) relevant to the north coast and only the north coast. The North Coast Regional Board (with oversight by the State Board) is in the best position to assess, promulgate, and implement actions necessary to protect water quality values in areas of timber harvest in the region. Management scenario from outside the region would necessarily by less effective and more costly in the long run. The proposed action from the State Board is inconsistent with all of the above as it can not effectively take into account regional variability.

Proposed Action is not consistent with the current MAA (SWRCB/CDF): Several years ago, due to forest management inconstancies between CDF and the SWRCB, and the apparent lack of ability by CDF to address water quality conditions on Timber Harvest Plans, the MAA was adjusted to address issue. The proposed change in Waiver and Waste Discharge Reporting for Timber Operations would have to be rewritten to accommodate proposed changes.

Proposed Action cannot be consistent with CEQA mandates: The proposed action is a project – under CEQA. Given the above discussion, it should be apparent that the proposed action by the State Board cannot meet CEQA mandates of mitigation. It is not possible to mitigate by making things worse – through streamlining and centralized control. It is not possible to mitigate issues discussed above.

This proposal is a step backward threatening the integrity of the State Board and resources it is responsible for.

Coastal Zone Management Act Reauthorization Findings

EPA /NOAA

FORESTRY

FINDING: California’s program includes management measures in conformity with the 6217(g) guidance and includes enforceable policies and mechanisms for implementation. However, additional management measures are necessary in order to attain and maintain water quality standards (see Section XII, page 15).

RATIONALE: The primary authority in California to implement the management measures for forestry in conformance with the 6217 (g) guidance comes from the Z’berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act (FPA) (Cal. Pub. Res. Code 4511 et seq.). Regulations (14 Cal. Code Reg. 895 et seq.) adopted pursuant to this law include practices in conformity with the management measures. The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) also have oversight over nonpoint discharges associated with forestry operations through the Porter-Cologne Act. The Porter-Cologne Act provides back-up authority for implementing the management measures, including waste discharge requirements, cease and desist orders, cleanup and abatement orders, civil monetary liability for specified violations, and criminal prosecutions for specified violations.

Prior to any timber harvest on non-federal lands, a Timber Harvest Plan (THP) must be prepared by a Registered Professional Forester. A multidisciplinary and interagency review is intended to be conducted for all THPs to meet the functional equivalency requirements of environmental documentation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These activities are carried out primarily by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the Board of Forestry(CDF/BOF), as well as the RWQCBs, in accordance with the Water Quality Management Plan for Timber Operations on NonFederal Lands, and the Management Agency Agreement (MAA), as overseen by the SWRCB.

Although California does have the basic legal and programmatic tools to implement a forestry program in conformity with Section 6217, these tools have not been fully effective in ensuring water quality standards are attained and maintained and beneficial uses are protected. California waters currently experience significant impacts from forestry. For example, silviculture is the leading source of impairment to water quality in the North Coast of California. Related to these water quality problems, California has a number of species, in particular salmon, that are endangered, threatened or otherwise seriously at risk, due in very significant part to forestry activities that impair their spawning, breeding and rearing habitat.

Section 6217 recognizes that implementation of the (g) management measures alone may not always be adequate to protect coastal waters from nonpoint sources of pollution. In these cases, Section 6217 requires the identification and implementation of additional management measures. Thus, California will need to adopt additional management measures for forestry to address coastal waters that are not attaining or maintaining applicable water quality standards or protecting beneficial uses, or that are threatened by reasonably foreseeable increases in pollutant loadings from new or expanding forestry operations. (See Section XII, page 15)

Forest Practice issues are to be addressed, under Section 6216, under agreed upon “Action Plan (action and implementation strategies)” submitted by the State to EPA and NOAA.

Action to Support Clean Water!

Contact Your Local County Commissioner and Tell Him or Her to Support Clean Water!

The National Association of Counties (NACo) represents county governments all throughout the U.S.  Each year, NACo meets to consider resolutions on federal issues that affect their local governments.  Because this organization is made up of local officials, NACo is very influential with Congress.

In years past, NACo has passed resolutions opposing the Clean Water Restoration Act based on misleading information provided by industry and property rights groups.  Members of Congress have cited NACo’s objections as an excuse not to move this critical legislation forward.  However, that is all about to change.

This year NACo will consider a “Clean Water for All” resolution that supports the compromise bill passed in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on June 18th.  If NACo adopts this resolution, then the organization can no longer lobby against the Clean Water Restoration Act.  This would significantly improve our chance of passing the bill in Congress.

We need you to make phone calls before Thursday, July 23rd!

County commissioners who serve on NACo’s Environment Committee and its Board of Directors have a chance to vote on this important resolution at their annual conference in Nashville, TN, July 24-27th. We need supporters of clean water to call and email their commissioners and urge them to vote YES on the “Clean Water for All” resolution.   Click here for talking points, a sample letter, and to access a spreadsheet that lists the county commissioners who will vote on this resolution.

WOPR Canceled–Obama Cancels Bush Era Plan to Clearcut Oregon Forests

WOPR Canceled – Obama Administration Cancels Bush Era Plan to Clearcut Oregon Forests Salmon, clean water, and old-growth forests big winners
Portland, OR — People throughout the west celebrated an Obama administration decision to cancel a Bush era plan that would have nearly quadrupled current logging on public lands in western Oregon.  The Bush plan, called the Western Oregon Plan Revision, or WOPR, rezoned 2.6 million acres of federal public forests in Oregon managed by the Bureau of Land Management.  The announcement came in response to a lawsuit filed by thirteen conservation and fisheries protection organizations challenging the Bush logging plan.  Obama administration officials said the Bush plan illegally ignored requirements to protect endangered species living in the forests and could not be defended in court.
The decision to cancel the massive timber giveaway conforms with numerous scientific studies concluding that dramatic increases in logging would have harmed clean water and healthy streams, pushed wildlife toward extinction, and contributed to global warming.  The plan to clearcut 500 million board feet of timber per year would also have destroyed much of Oregon’s remaining old-growth forests.
“It’s a good day for the wildlife and wild places that make Oregon so special,” said Doug Heiken of Oregon Wild.  “It’s also a good day for all the businesses up and down the Oregon coast that depend on visitors from all over the world who come here to catch a salmon or see what a real Northwest forest is supposed to look like.
“The Obama administration finally listened to what our best scientists have been desperately trying to say about the need to protect our irreplaceable natural resources,” said Joseph Vaile of the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center based in southwest Oregon.
Today’s announcement aligns the Obama administration squarely with the wishes of the public which opposed the Bush clearcutting plan by over 90 percent.
“Southwest Oregon has much of the lands that were to be clearcut under the WOPR.  We are pleased that level heads have prevailed, and our old growth will be protected,” said Shane Jimerfield, Siskiyou Project.
“Instead of a sea of stumps, we will now have healthy forests, healthy streams and salmon, and a rebounding economy,” said Kristen Boyles, an attorney with Earthjustice.  “We’re grateful that our citizens’ legal challenge could stop this plan until the Obama administration was in place to listen to the people and follow America’s environmental laws.”
“Today’s announcement means many important salmon protections will be preserved in what are the last, best spawning and rearing areas for salmon on public lands,” commented Glen Spain, for the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), one of the co-plaintiffs and a major commercial fishing organization.  “This announcement is good news for hard working commercial fishing families struggling to survive on salmon runs nearly ruined by decades of excessive logging.”
“The forests and species of northwestern California are connected to the rest of our regional old-growth forests through BLM land in southern Oregon,” said Scott Greacen of EPIC.  “Today’s announcement basically restores the southern half of the Northwest Forest Plan.”
“Intact old growth forests with clean healthy streams are an economic engine that really drives Oregon’s prosperity, and it is encouraging to see that the Obama Administration recognizes the amazing values our ancient forests provide other than timber extraction,” stated Bob Freimark of The Wilderness Society.
Chuck Willer, Executive Director of the Coast Range Association, said, “The Obama administration has just saved the best remaining native forest in the northern third of Oregon’s Coast Range region.  This is a gift to tomorrow’s children for a region in short supply of old growth forest and quality salmon habitat.”
“The highest and best use of these forests is for carbon storage, water quality, salmon and wildlife habitat,” said Randi Spivak, National Center for Conservation Science and Policy.
“The Obama administration’s move today signals a return to scientific management of our public forests and marks an important step towards protecting Oregon’s remaining mature and old growth forests from unsustainable logging and roadbuilding,” said Ivan Maluski, Conservation Coordinator for the Oregon Chapter of the Sierra Club. “These last wild forests protect the climate, produce clean water, and sustain world class salmon runs and recreational opportunities that contribute to Oregon’s diverse economy.”
The announcement comes in response to a lawsuit filed by Earthjustice challenging the now discredited Bush logging plan. Earthjustice represents Oregon Wild, Siskiyou Project, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, The Wilderness Society, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Center for Biological Diversity, EPIC, Umpqua Watersheds, American Lands Alliance, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Greenpeace, Coast Range Association, and Sierra Club.
Hey, some good news for the forests!
Portland, OR — People throughout the west celebrated an Obama administration decision to cancel a Bush era plan that would have nearly quadrupled current logging on public lands in western Oregon.  The Bush plan, called the Western Oregon Plan Revision, or WOPR, rezoned 2.6 million acres of federal public forests in Oregon managed by the Bureau of Land Management.  The announcement came in response to a lawsuit filed by thirteen conservation and fisheries protection organizations challenging the Bush logging plan.  Obama administration officials said the Bush plan illegally ignored requirements to protect endangered species living in the forests and could not be defended in court.
The decision to cancel the massive timber giveaway conforms with numerous scientific studies concluding that dramatic increases in logging would have harmed clean water and healthy streams, pushed wildlife toward extinction, and contributed to global warming.  The plan to clearcut 500 million board feet of timber per year would also have destroyed much of Oregon’s remaining old-growth forests.
“It’s a good day for the wildlife and wild places that make Oregon so special,” said Doug Heiken of Oregon Wild.  “It’s also a good day for all the businesses up and down the Oregon coast that depend on visitors from all over the world who come here to catch a salmon or see what a real Northwest forest is supposed to look like.
“The Obama administration finally listened to what our best scientists have been desperately trying to say about the need to protect our irreplaceable natural resources,” said Joseph Vaile of the Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center based in southwest Oregon.
Today’s announcement aligns the Obama administration squarely with the wishes of the public which opposed the Bush clearcutting plan by over 90 percent.
“Southwest Oregon has much of the lands that were to be clearcut under the WOPR.  We are pleased that level heads have prevailed, and our old growth will be protected,” said Shane Jimerfield, Siskiyou Project.
“Instead of a sea of stumps, we will now have healthy forests, healthy streams and salmon, and a rebounding economy,” said Kristen Boyles, an attorney with Earthjustice.  “We’re grateful that our citizens’ legal challenge could stop this plan until the Obama administration was in place to listen to the people and follow America’s environmental laws.”
“Today’s announcement means many important salmon protections will be preserved in what are the last, best spawning and rearing areas for salmon on public lands,” commented Glen Spain, for the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), one of the co-plaintiffs and a major commercial fishing organization.  “This announcement is good news for hard working commercial fishing families struggling to survive on salmon runs nearly ruined by decades of excessive logging.”
“The forests and species of northwestern California are connected to the rest of our regional old-growth forests through BLM land in southern Oregon,” said Scott Greacen of EPIC.  “Today’s announcement basically restores the southern half of the Northwest Forest Plan.”
“Intact old growth forests with clean healthy streams are an economic engine that really drives Oregon’s prosperity, and it is encouraging to see that the Obama Administration recognizes the amazing values our ancient forests provide other than timber extraction,” stated Bob Freimark of The Wilderness Society.
Chuck Willer, Executive Director of the Coast Range Association, said, “The Obama administration has just saved the best remaining native forest in the northern third of Oregon’s Coast Range region.  This is a gift to tomorrow’s children for a region in short supply of old growth forest and quality salmon habitat.”
“The highest and best use of these forests is for carbon storage, water quality, salmon and wildlife habitat,” said Randi Spivak, National Center for Conservation Science and Policy.
“The Obama administration’s move today signals a return to scientific management of our public forests and marks an important step towards protecting Oregon’s remaining mature and old growth forests from unsustainable logging and roadbuilding,” said Ivan Maluski, Conservation Coordinator for the Oregon Chapter of the Sierra Club. “These last wild forests protect the climate, produce clean water, and sustain world class salmon runs and recreational opportunities that contribute to Oregon’s diverse economy.”
The announcement comes in response to a lawsuit filed by Earthjustice challenging the now discredited Bush logging plan. Earthjustice represents Oregon Wild, Siskiyou Project, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, The Wilderness Society, Cascadia Wildlands Project, Center for Biological Diversity, EPIC, Umpqua Watersheds, American Lands Alliance, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, Greenpeace, Coast Range Association, and Sierra Club.
–Larry