Archive for October, 2008

Symposium on Illegal Water Diversions–Mendo Co.

HELP!?! Does anyone here have specific info or sources of info on
Vineyards’ illegal water diversions? Anderson Valley, in particular,
is said to have been the location of notorious non-permitted water
extractions for decades. These are said to be well known. Where are
they? No action is said to have ever been taken.

It is clear, both from the participation of the Mendocino County
Sheriffs Office and this item being a prominent feature of the
Measure B campaign, that the focus of the meeting will be outlaw pot
growers, NOT illegal diversions by Vineyard operators.

Vineyard operators use exponentially more water, both legally and
illegally sourced, than all the county’s cannabis cultivators
combined, but we can count on cannabis being a red herring in this
discussion.

THE BIGGER PICTURE - although pooh poohed by some well informed
cannabis activists, events such as this are forming the building
blocks for a statewide assault on Prop 215. Count on it

SYMPOSIUM ON ILLEGAL WATER DIVERSIONS TO BE HELD IN WILLITS
Coho salmon and steelhead trout that once were abundant in
Northern California’s rivers and streams are now nearly extinct. There
are many contributing factors to this decline, but one of the main
reasons is that people on both public and private lands are taking too
much water from the river systems for domestic and agricultural use.
Therefore too little is left flowing in the streambeds for the fish to
complete their spawning cycles. If these salmonid species are ever to
recover from the brink of extinction, immediate action by both private
landowners and government agencies responsible for protecting our
environment is essential.

PLEASE ATTEND AN IMPORTANT MEETING ON ILLEGAL WATER DIVERSIONS
THURS. OCT. 30th at 6:45 pm. READ ON. . .
The Willits Environmental Center has joined Friends of the Eel
River, the Pacific Coast Federation of Fisherman’s Associations, Gary
Roussan (Sportsman columnist for the Willits News), and the Mendocino
County Sheriff’s Department in cosponsoring the “Willits Symposium on
Illegal Water Diversions” to be held on Thursday, October 30th from
6:45 PM to 9:15 PM at the Willits Community Center. This Symposium
has three goals: 1) To inform the public about the dire condition of
the fisheries in spawning and rearing streams on public and private
lands; 2) To educate the public as to how fish and wildlife are
threatened by illegal water diversions and what constitutes an illegal
water diversion, and; 3) To explain to the public how the Mendocino
County Sheriff, the U.S. Forest Service, the California Department of
Fish & Game and the California State Water Resources Control Board are
currently enforcing the law against illegal water diverters. What is
the public’s role in helping to protect these resources? For more
information contact Jon Spitz at (707)984-6481 or jonspitz@xprs.net.
ILLEGAL WATER DIVERSIONS MEETING THURS. OCT. 30th at 6:45 pm.
WILLITS COMMUNITY
CENTER

California Took on Energy Crisis, Now it Faces Water Crisis

By Lester Snow, SF Chronicle, Op-Ed, 9.29.08

Once a week, a truck brings drinking water to the small town of Bodega, just west of Santa Rosa. Without this delivery, the Bodega Water Company could not meet the needs of the town’s 150 residents who normally rely on well water. The company expects to step up the trucked-in deliveries to twice a week and then daily as the state’s drought worsens and groundwater supplies dwindle.

Bodega’s water shortage is just one example of how serious the state’s water problems have become. While not every community in California is suffering like Bodega, many are facing serious water shortages. East Bay residents have already been asked to cut back their residential water use by 19 percent. In fact, 18 communities across the state have implemented some form of mandatory water rationing. Many other water agencies have asked customers to comply with voluntary conservation programs, have implemented price changes to make conservation a financially appealing choice, or have placed restrictions on water deliveries.

Public water agencies are only receiving 35 percent of their annual allocation of water from the State Water Project this year - the lowest level since the severe 1991 drought. In the coming year, deliveries will likely be even less.

California is looking down the barrel of a potentially severe, long-term drought. We’ve had two extremely dry years and initial forecasts from the National Weather Service are that the drought conditions will continue into next year.

Our reservoirs are low. Our groundwater supplies are being overdrafted in some areas. And court-ordered pumping limits have restricted our ability to move water through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the Bay Area, Central Valley and Southern California due to environmental concerns. A third dry year could have devastating consequences to California’s economy at a time when many businesses, industries, workers and farmers are already struggling.

In June, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger declared a statewide drought emergency and directed state agencies to take immediate action to address the drought impacts.

Armed with the governor’s direction, state water managers are addressing the problems created by the drought through a variety of programs, including the Drought Water Bank for 2009. This emergency program will allow the Department of Water Resources to purchase water from willing sellers and sell that water to at-risk water agencies, giving communities that are facing health or public safety issues top priority. We are also working hard to coordinate programs and services to ensure that the state’s efforts support conservation efforts at the local level.

Mother Nature may prove the weather predictions wrong and give us a long and wet winter. Even if she does, better-than-average rainfall and a healthy snowpack will not solve California’s long-term water problems.

In addition, climate change is altering our rainfall and snowpack - which the state relies on for water storage. This is something that we must plan for and manage. At the same time, our state water systems are aging and population growth is putting more and more pressure on our existing water supplies.

The drought reminds us all of the importance of providing a sustainable water supply system capable of meeting the needs of consumers now and in the future. The governor and Sen. Dianne Feinstein have proposed a comprehensive solution to California’s water crisis. It addresses conservation as well as new groundwater and surface storage facilities, conveyance facilities and environmental restoration.

But in the end, Californians need to fundamentally change how we use water. California needs to make water efficiency a priority at home, in our communities, on the farm and at the office. We can take immediate actions to conserve, such as adjusting how and when we water our gardens, shortening our showers and running our dishwasher only when it’s full. As we buy new appliances for our house or make long-term investments in our outdoor landscaping, our decisions directly affect future water use.

Before the state’s energy crisis, most Californians used power indiscriminately in their homes. Now many of us avoid peak energy-use times, instead running appliances during the evening hours and using other energy-saving products. This fundamental change has resulted in significant energy savings. It’s time to take the state’s water supply problems just as seriously. We can do it … we must do it.

To learn more…

Visit the state’s drought Web page: www.water.ca.gov/drought.

Read the governor’s declaration of drought, at links.sfgate.com/ZEYM

Investigate ways to save water at home, at links.sfgate.com/ZEYN

Lester Snow is the director of the California Department of Water Resources.

Water: Get Over the Dams, Toward Efficiency

Sacramento Bee - 9/08

california map

As California politicians continue to argue over developing comprehensive solutions to the state’s water problems, eyes are inevitably turning to the agricultural sector, which uses 80 percent of the water consumed by Californians.

Agriculture is important to our economy, culture and environment, but it is subject to mounting pressure from uncontrolled urbanization, global market pressures and threats to the reliability and availability of fresh water. A new Pacific Institute report demonstrates that we can support a more sustainable and profitable agricultural sector while substantially decreasing agricultural water withdrawals. Not only can we do more with less; we must do more with less.

Every water-scarce region runs into the same challenge. As the demand for water outstrips local supplies, we first seek to tap ever-more-distant resources through the construction of massive dams and vast aqueduct systems. California went through this phase in the 20th century, building the Central Valley Project, the State Water Project, the Colorado River Aqueduct, the Los Angeles Aqueduct, the Hetch Hetchy and Mokelumne systems, and countless other components of our modern water supply.

But it is a myth that just a few more dams or bigger groundwater pumps will, once and for all, solve our water problems. With the economic, ecological and political realities of taking even more water from overtaxed rivers and aquifers becoming more apparent, harder decisions have to be made. The good news is that there are smart things that can be done.

Currently, our farmers face two very different futures. One leads to growing disruptions in the agricultural sector, uncertainty about the reliability of food production and the weakening of a vital component of our traditional economy. The other leads to a carefully planned and efficient agricultural sector, long-term protections for land and water resources, and the production of more high-value crops grown with efficient irrigation systems that are managed to respond to varying weather and crop conditions.

We can choose to make California agriculture more water-efficient and productive, thereby ensuring that farming remains a central element of our culture and economy. The key is to improve water-use efficiency and provide for greater reliability so that farmers can apply sufficient water when and where it is needed. We can protect high-quality agricultural land from urban encroachment through careful planning, and we can grow more food with less water.

The Pacific Institute’s new study evaluates four scenarios that improve agricultural water-use efficiency. Each is a straightforward extension of trends and efforts already under way by innovative growers around the state, and each shows the potential to increase production with less water. Over the past two decades, farmers have slowly shifted toward sprinkler and drip irrigation systems, which can boost production without increasing water use. They have reduced the acreage devoted to field crops, such as cotton, alfalfa and irrigated pasture, while growing more fruits, nuts and vegetables. They are also improving management practices. For example, automated weather stations throughout the state provide information to help farmers more accurately judge the right timing for irrigation, and smart monitors can help farmers distribute water on fields more precisely.

But farmers need help to accelerate these changes. Initial costs are often high for changing irrigation systems. Our complex system of water rights is inconsistently applied and rarely enforced, and it does not provide incentives for farmers to reduce wasteful uses. Perverse subsidies often lead to overapplication of water rather than more careful use.

For the agricultural sector to make necessary adaptations and investments, the state needs to implement policies and offer incentives that support water conservation and efficiency improvements.

How can we start along this path? We can offer tax exemptions and rebates to farmers who upgrade to more efficient irrigation systems. The State Water Board can enforce California’s water-rights laws more rationally. Water districts and individual growers can more accurately measure exactly how much water is being used to do what. And new water-rate structures can be developed to encourage efficient water use.

We are at a crossroads. If farming is going to thrive in the coming decades, we must begin planning now for a smooth transition to efficient, modern agriculture that uses less water to grow more food and produces more income for farmers than today. It is time for California to implement economic and environmental policies that support agricultural water conservation and efficiency, both for the good of the environment and for the health and sustainability of our farmers. Let’s figure out how to do more with less.

Peter H. Gleick directs the Pacific Institute in Oakland and has been researching and writing on water problems for 25 years.

Click here for the institute’s new water report, “More With Less.”

Rainwater Harvesting Information

Lots of good material here concerning rainwater harvesting: http://www.harvesth2o.com/

Addresses building code issues and stresses that harvested rainwater is not ‘reclaimed’ water and should not be regulated as such.

Stephen

RRWP Files Appeal Over SR’s Wastewater Site

Hi everyone:

I would like to announce that yesterday Russian River Watershed Protection
Committee filed an appeal with the City of Santa Rosa to have the City
Council hear our concerns about the BPU’s Certification of the FEIR on the
Discharge Compliance Project.  We don’t know when this will be scheduled,
but will let people know as soon as  we find out.  Our group has never filed
such a challenge before and as far as I know, no one else ever has either.

We are asking the City Council to  recirculate the FEIR in order to address
late changes to the document that did not provide an opportunity  for
citizen comment and consultant response.  (See letter for details.)

We don’t know how this appeal will affect the scheduling of the project
selection hearing by the BPU on Dec. 4th.  In general, we are not sure how
this will affect the overall fast track schedule the City had established.

Attached to this email is the letter we submitted to the BPU two days before
their Oct. 2nd meeting, at which they certified the FEIR.  Also attached is
the letter we submitted that explains the basis for our appeal.  They
charged us $391 to file the appeal.

You are welcome to pass this on to anyone else who might be interested.  I
am also open to answering questions about this action. Feel free to contact
me.

Have a great weekend.

Brenda

PS:  I am sending this to several lists, so please forgive dupli

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance Files Protest to Protect Rivers Against Further Overdraft

By Chris Shutes, FERC Projects Director
September 28, 2008

The Russian River Flood Control and Water Conservation Improvement District (“Mendocino District”) has petitioned the State Water Resource Control Board for water from Lake Mendocino under two County of Origin water rights applications. Mendocino claims, based on a reading of old water rights applications and decisions, that water from Lake Mendocino is available for appropriation.

The problem is that there is no “surplus” water left in the Russian River. Water taken by the Mendocino District will have to be taken away from someone else. Since this is likely to be contentious and involve large amounts of money, CSPA believes that there is a strong chance that some of the water that is being requested will come at the expense of the Russian River, where salmon and steelhead are already doing very poorly.

In 1949, the State of California made “State Filings” on behalf of both Mendocino County and Sonoma County water interests in the Russian River drainage. The state filings were made in accordance with County of Origin statutes in the State Water Code, which seek to assure that counties where water originates have water needed for development.

Basically, the idea is to prevent a situation where more developed counties get the water first, leaving none behind for rural and upstream watersheds. In general, California water law requires water users to use a water right, and does not allow water users to save the right to use water for an indefinite period. State filings, recognizing that counties of origin were at a disadvantage both in terms of money and rate of development, are an exception to this general principle.

Complicating the situation is the fact that a large portion of the water that finds its way to Lake Mendocino every year is water from the mainstem Eel River that has been exported through PG&E’s Potter Valley hydroelectric project to the Russian River watershed. This exported water has helped to fuel the rampant growth of viticulture in Mendocino and Sonoma counties, and urban growth in those same counties and also in Marin. While this has continued, the salmon and steelhead fisheries in the mainstem Eel have declined dramatically, and are in danger of extirpation. If more water from Lake Mendocino is promised to Mendocino District customers, it will become harder than ever to restore water to the Eel River watershed.

While CSPA believes that state filings can serve an important function, we filed this protest to protect fisheries and other instream values in both the Eel and the Russian. We also believe that there will soon be many similar requests statewide to appropriate water under state filings. Many, if not most of these future requests will also take place in watersheds that are fully appropriated or over-appropriated. We want to be sure that the State Water Resources Control Board addresses this and future applications for water under state filings in a thorough and protective way, and that the Board employs and establishes a comprehensive process for doing this.

Thus, CSPA has asked for a number of measures and process requirements in considering Mendocino’s petitions. We want the Board to make an up-to-date accounting of water in both the Russian and Eel watersheds, with modern tools. We also want the Board to take a fresh look at all of the impacts of all the diversions in these watersheds, and not accept up front an already unacceptable situation.

L.A Times Op-ed Dorothy Green penned days before her death

A heartfelt plea for a sensible water policy Heal the Bay’s founder lays out her vision for a clean and sustainable state supply. By Dorothy Green October 8, 2008

california map

To everything there is a season; but water is eternal. Or it was, until we started disturbing its natural rhythms. We penned it behind dams and diverted it to aqueducts, starving the life out of rivers and creating an unsupportable addiction to using more water than we need to live.

Despite the looming crisis in water, we have enough to live on, but not enough to waste. And waste it we have, with great enthusiasm for lush green lawns in a desert and a penchant for backroom deals with agribusiness. These deals end up as sweetheart ones for the moneyed corporate farmers, providing them with essentially a bountiful private water supply, which they sell off at a profit, while the rest of us are carefully metered and potentially rationed.

I have spent more than 30 years fighting for clean water and a sustainable supply for California . As this is being written, I am bedridden, under hospice care. I am making one last plea for common-sense management of our water supply in a manner that protects public health and the environment while sustaining business and agriculture.

How? The state Water Resources Control Board already has the authority — legal and regulatory — to manage the state’s water resources. But it hasn’t been doing so. For example, it has issued from five to seven times the amount of water rights than there is available water. It is also responsible for water rights and quality in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, yet 10 sewage treatment plants in the delta area discharge treated wastewater that contains large amounts of pollutants into the water supply.

The board should be depoliticized and sufficiently funded so that it can do its duty effectively. It should create a sustainable water plan that has teeth, with bipartisan support from the governor and the Legislature. This is how to make this happen:

  • Create an independent structure for water rights: a water court comprising three appointed administrative law judges who specialize in water rights to handle those disputes before the board. Their decision-making must be consistent with applicable law, but there should be a mandate that they allocate water according to the actual availability of supply in the state. They also should review past water-rights decisions to bring them in line with existing supplies.
  • The board should develop a sustainable water plan with accountability. Enforcement mechanisms would include financial penalties and operating restrictions for wayward agencies. There also should be an independent and public biennial assessment of the plan’s implementation. Continue reading ‘L.A Times Op-ed Dorothy Green penned days before her death’

Jenner Headlands Finalized to Open Space in Sonoma County

Wonderful news and long sought.

Thanks to our own Supervisor Reilly, the Land Trust and so many others we
have a treasure preserved for all time.

Now we have to go to work on protecting the rest, and connecting the
headlands east.

Congratulations to all of you who have worked so long and hard to make this
happen. Be sure to spread the good news.

Have a wonderful autumn week,
Rue

I am pleased to share this news with each of you — after more than four
years of negotiations, the agreement to purchase Jenner Headlands has
finally been completed, and was announced today during a media event at the
site.

We expect to see news coverage of the announcement on Channel 7 [KGO-TV]
during the 6 p.m. newscast tonight, and on the front page of the Friday
Press Democrat. The attached news release also has been distributed to other
media.

Supervisor Mike Reilly set the tone for the day when he told the reporters
that this agreement is perhaps “the most significant purchase in the history
of Sonoma County.” Certainly you will agree that today’s event is a
significant milestone in the District’s history.

Thank you, all, for your continued support of the District.

Sincerely,

Andrea

Andrea Mackenzie
General Manager
Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District
(707) 565-7360
www.sonomaopenspace.org
Permanently protecting the diverse agricultural, natural resource,
and scenic open space lands of Sonoma County for future generations

Important Dates Related to Russian River

Hi everyone!

I have one update, one correction, and one clarification to make to this list (below).

1. Santa Rosa Storage Oct. 16th meeting will take place in City Council Chambers at 5 PM. (update regarding time)

2. The Community Meeting in Guerneville on the Biological Opinion is on Thursday, Nov. 6th (NOT Nov. 13th)……(correction)

3. The meeting on Nov. 5th at Villa Chanticleer is of course in Healdsburg (clarification)

Please note these in your calendars.

Brenda

Hi everyone:
We not only have the election to track, but there’s a number of important water/wastewater meetings and deadlines coming up.  I thought it might be helpful if I list them.  This list is not necessarily complete.  PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ADD TO THIS LIST AND RECIRCULATE.

Brenda

SANTA ROSA WASTEWATER BPU:  RIVER DISCHARGE:  (3 meetings) Study session on project selection for river discharge:  Nov. 6, 2008

1: 30 PM City Council Chambers 100 SR Ave.

Study Session on project selection for river discharge;  joint meeting with City Council to review study session results:  Nov. 18, 2008 in City Council Chambers (not sure of time/call city to check)

Project Selection/Approval:  Dec. 4, 2008 1:30 PM City Council Chambers *** This is VERY important meeting to decide river discharge option.  We hope a lot of people will plan to be there.

SR/ STORAGE EIR:
BPU considers EIR certification for Storage options on Oct. 16, 2008.  They will then put this on the shelf and not do any project selection until some indefinite time in the future

BIOLOGICAL OPINION:  4 COMMUNITY MEETINGS Wed. Nov. 5th:  Dry Creek Habitat Restoration:  Villa Chanticleer:  1248 N. Fitch Mt. Rd.  Open house 6:30 PM/ presentations start at 7 PM.

Thursday, Nov. 6th:  Flow Changes Guerneville Vets Hall, 1st and Church St.  Open house 6;30 PM/ presentations at 7 PM

Thursday, Nov. 13:  Flow changes Ukiah BOS Chambers 501 Low Gap Rd. (same times as above

Wednesday, Nov. 19th: Estuary adaptive management Jenner Community Hall 10432 Hwy. 1 (Park across from gas station and walk behind gas station and across foot bridge)  same time as others

NORTH COAST REGIONAL BOARD Oct. 21, 2008 Public Workshop 10 AM to 12 noon at 5550 Skylane Blvd. in SR.  They are seeking environmental information to be considered in Basin Plan Amendment on Dissolved Oxygen (Scoping document available on their website at http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast)  Contact:  Alydda Mangelsdorf (707) 576-6735

Also:  comments are due on stormwater permit for County and Santa Rosa by Oct. 22, 2008.  Document can be found on their website.  (Contact 576-2220 and ask for staff person on this item for more information

EEL-RUSSIAN RIVER COMMISSION Oct. 22, 2008 1:30 PM Sonoma County Board of Supervisors Chambers 575 Administration Dr.  SR Main agenda item:  Proposed Eel/Russian River Trans-Basin Diversion Settlement (Anyone know what this is about?)  There is nothing on the agenda referring to the Biological Opinion

SONOMA COUNTY WATER COALTION Oct. 22, 2008 7 PM Sebastopol Vets Building Presentation on Dorothy Green’s book:  “Managing Water:  Avoiding Crisis in California”  Panel discussion after words on issues around irrigating with recycled water

LAGUNA FOUNDATION October 30, 2008:  Stakeholders Council 9 AM to 12 PM Santa Rosa’s Laguna Treatment Plant

WAC/TAC (Water Contractors regular meeting) Nov. 3, 2008 Combined WAC/TAC meeting 9 AM Laguna Treatment Plant

Hearings on Klamath Dams

Public Hearings on Dams’ Water Quality Begin!

October 20th-29th, 2008

For the last 4 years PacifiCorp’s Klamath dams have created one of the worst toxic algae problems ever recorded. This month, the State Water Board will decide if the dams get a clean water permit, or if they get removed. Help us fill these meetings with people speaking up for clean water and dam removal on the Klamath! For more info: http://www.klamathriver.org/Action-Alerts.html#hearings

Eureka, Ca - Oct. 20th, 1:30-3:30 pm
Klamath, Ca - Oct. 20th, 6-8 pm
Orleans, Ca - Oct. 21st, 12-2 pm
Yreka, Ca - Oct. 21st, 6-8 pm
Sacramento, Ca - Oct. 29th, 3-6 pm
>> For more meeting details: http://www.klamathriver.org/Action-Alerts.html#hearings