Monthly Archive for August, 2008

Comments on Santa Rosa’s Leaky Pipes

Dear Brenda,
As usual you are right on the target. The leaking gravity sewer collection
mains act as giant French Drain collectors of ground water, reducing the
recharge while polluting the ground water with ex-filtration at times. Small
diameter STEP systems would not and cost less to install and operate.

Northern California River Watch has been addressing the issue of
infiltration/ ex-filtration in its environmental litigation for many years.

The same problem is occurring in many of the vineyard plantings that have
installed tile or under-drains. These drains quickly drain off the fields
making land that would otherwise be seasonally wet sponge stay relatively
unsaturated. The result is very evident in the increased flashy flooding we
experience in Graton and other parts of the county. Instead of soaking into
the former apple orchards and pastures, the rain water is drained off
quickly. vineyards develop a plow pan and this limitsthe rate of percolation
down into the water table. Quickly draining off the water and limiting the
depth of the sponge means that far less water is retained going into summer.
By late summer when the smaller creeks are drying out, the problem is
further exacerbated by irrigating from wells adjacent to these same creeks.
This agricultural practice of draining off most of the winter flows needs to
be addressed or floods will continue to get worse while summer flows will
continue to drop.

Bob Rawson

Here’s a letter I just sent to the PD

Brenda

Dear Editor:

Richard Dowd, Chair of Santa Rosa’s Board of Public Utilities, was quoted in
a recent article stating, “If we can shut off the infiltration and inflow,
we don’t have to collect it, treat it or dispose of it. The savings could
be substantial.” This was in reference to the many old, leaky pipes that
collect the City’s sewage and send it off for treatment.

For years Russian River Watershed Protection Committee has been requesting
emphasis on pipe repair and replacement rather than continued construction
of expensive infrastructure that increases river discharges. What never
gets mentioned is all the potable rain water that gets wasted when it could
be recharging our aquifers. The article mentions that flows can go as high
as 100 million gallons a day. This is almost seven times higher than normal
and represents wasted potable water supplies.

In light of global warming concerns and many summer flow problems in the
Russian River, this rainwater could provide a heretofore unconsidered and
greatly needed additional water resource.

Furthermore, while Santa Rosa has a good treatment system as compared to
many others, their wastewater still contains many unregulated contaminants
that could be contributing to problems for endangered salmonid species and
drinking water supplies. Fixing leaky pipes should be prioritized over
massive and expensive new infrastructure that would bring direct discharge
to the Russian River at Healdsburg or Forestville.

Brenda Adelman

Links to Comments on SR’s Recycled Water Project

Here’s the link to comments received by SR on the Discharge and Storage options. Please forgive duplications.

Brenda

Incremental Recycled Water Program (IRWP) Update
August 5, 2008

Comments received on the City of Santa Rosa’s Discharge Compliance and Seasonal Storage Projects Draft EIRs are now available on the City’s web site as noted below. Responses to these comments are currently being prepared. Both documents are scheduled to be certified this Fall (2008) and will be fully noticed prior to the meetings;

• Discharge Compliance Project EIR – Comment Letters http://ci.santa-rosa.ca.us/departments/utilities/irwp/discharge/Pages/studies_reports.aspx

• Seasonal Storage Project EIR – Comment Letters http://www.recycledwaterprogram.com/departments/utilities/irwp/storage/Pages/studies_reports.aspx

Additional information is available at: IRWP http://www.recycledwaterprogram.com/ (http://www.SRCity.org/IRWP).

If you know others who would like to receive periodic e-mail updates on the Incremental Recycled Water Program, please have them send an e-mail request to: SRrecycledwater@DataInstincts.com.

Please contact our office if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Mark Millan

Lake Mendocino Water–Round Valley Indian Tribe

Hey David,

In response to your email I was forwarded this attachment by someone in the water world up there as it pertains to some of the opinions of the Round Valley Indian Tribe. Thought you might find it of interest or maybe it is already on your radar?
Brock

“…Brock, I’ve attached the tribe’s outline. Basically, they want to protect the fishery on the Eel by capping the amount of water that can be diverted to the Russian at the amount that can be delivered through the existing tunnel – no more. They are throwing us this bone to get our support when they go the Humboldt County, the State, and the Feds…”

To: Tam Doduc
Chair, State Water Resources Control Board
Sacramento, CA

RE: reported demands for more water from Lake Mendocino by Russian River Flood Control District

Dear Chairwoman Doduc:

Before any more water is taken from Lake Mendocino for the Russian River Flood Control District, or anyone else:

- Where are the water balance calculations for Lake Mendocino and the East Branch, Russian River?
- How much more is there to give out?
- How much of that is coming from the reservoir’s own watershed?
- How much of that is coming from diversions of the Eel River?
- Where is the long term (50+ years) plan to address local and regional water supplies, D.1610 releases and Eel River jeopardy decisions?
- How will seasonal so-called ‘emergency’ needs, like frost or heat protection for the increasing number of vineyards, be addressed?
- Who will address the proliferation of new water demands on the Russian River and its tributaries, including the rapid increase in vineyards?

No actions should be taken until these and other questions and concerns are heard and addressed. We look forward to a full public process and notification regarding these important issues.

David Keller
Bay Area Director, Friends of the Eel River
Local water boost from Lake Mendocino under consideration at state level (UkiahJournal) Local water boost from Lake Mendocino under consideration at state level

By BEN BROWN The Daily Journal
Article Last Updated: 07/20/2008 12:00:16 AM PDT

The Russian River Flood Control District may be allowed to pump an additional 6,000 acre feet of water out of Lake Mendocino every year if their recently accepted application is approved by the State Water Resources Control Board.

The state has accepted the district’s application for more water and a public comment period will open soon.

The application would amend the district’s 1949 water right, which currently gives it the right to 8,000 acre-feet of water from the lake. If approved, the amended application would increase that right 14,000 acre-feet.

District Executive Director Barbara Spazek said RRFCD plans to make the water available to the Redwood Valley Water District.

“It’s always been the district’s intention, if we got the water, to make it available to Redwood Valley,” Spazek said.

Last fall, the level of Lake Mendocino dropped so low that RVWD had to cut their withdrawals from the lake in half and declare a water emergency.

The plan will be released for public comment soon. Spazek said the district had not received notification of when the plan will be available.

If there are no objections the application goes back to the state for a approval, but Spazek said she expects objections.

“I’m sure the Sonoma County will have something to say about it,” she said.

Representatives of local fisheries and downstream water users may also have objections, Spazek said. She said downstream water users have the least to fear because the water would be pumped out of Lake Mendocino and not diverted out of the Russian River.

Any objections will have to be addressed and plans for their mitigation will have to be in place before the plan goes back to the state board.

“If the state does not agree with the water availability, it throws it out,” Spazek said.

The state board will have to look at the plan under the California Environmental Quality Act and could go so far as to require and Environmental Impact Report.

The public comment period is expected to last for 45 days, and review by the state board can take up to 90 additional days to complete.

Spazek also said she will be leaving the position of executive director of the RRFCD at the end of the month, to be replaced by Fisheries Biologist Sean White.

Ben Brown can be reached at udjbb@pacific.net
[NOTE: Sean White was formerly the Fisheries Biologist for SCWA]

HUFFMAN GETS TOP FISHERIES SPOT IN CA ASSEMBLY

FYI…

HUFFMAN GETS TOP FISHERIES SPOT IN CA ASSEMBLY: California Assemblyman Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) was appointed Chairman of the Water, Parks, & Wildlife Committee, considered the top fisheries post in the California Assembly. The Committee oversees fish and game, parks and recreation, water resources and flood management and will benefit by having the avid fisherman, former Marin Municipal Water District Director and Natural Resources Defense Council lawyer at its helm. Already Huffman has called for an overhaul of the Department of Fish and Game (DFG), citing the huge amount of science Legislators rely on from the DFG in decision making. “I think it’s time to refocus, if not re-invent, the agency,” said Huffman. “…DFG doesn’t always act like a full-fledged resource protection agency.” He also wants to see more funding supplied by Legislators to the DFG, which has suffered with a 27% budget decrease from last year.

Huffman has placed “protecting and restoring our fisheries” among his top priorities, and in addition to revamping the Department of Fish & Game, has called for closer looks at the collapse of the Delta ecosystem from issues such as water exports, poor land use planning, invasive species, and polluted runoff. He hopes to create and engage strategies to restore the Delta while improving flood management and increasing water supply reliability. Read more about Jared Huffman’s appointment in the 10 July 2008 Marin Independent Journal at www.marinij.com/sanrafael/ci_9842028 http://www.marinij.com/sanrafael/ci_9842028 .

Sheephouse Creek Watershed Update

On behalf of the “Friends of Sheephouse Creek,” I wanted to provide you an update in our attempt to affect the Ricioli Ranch Non Industrial Timber Management Plan being proposed for 331 acres of Sheephouse Creek watershed in Sonoma County. The timber owners continue to insist they have the right to use an easement road through our property rather than avoid the impacts, both human and environmental, that this NTMP will have upon our family and our property over the next 40 years, not to mention Sheephouse Creek, its watershed and the Coho salmon which are being restored here.

Out of a sense of helplessness, we have written to the Governor for help and he responded through the acting director of California Department of Fish and Game. They have agreed to look at our concerns and to perform a Coho Salmon Impact Evaluation, which determines if the NTMP will result in “take” (harm) or significant impacts to the Coho salmon. Also at risk is the many millions of dollars that the taxpayer has invested in the Coho Salmon Recovery Program, not only in Sheephouse Creek, but in Ward and Mill Creeks.

The NTMP was returned for corrections to the forester, GTE & Associates, on 21 Feb 2008 and to date, it has not been re-filed. No Pre Harvest Inspection of the site has been scheduled at this time. This has given us a little time to make people aware of this NTMP and its potential to do harm to Sheephouse Creek and its watershed. Local fly fishing groups, such as the Golden West Women Flyfishers, have jumped into the fray and have offered to help, as well as the Environmental Protection Information Center, Forests Unlimited, and the Small Boat Commercial Salmon Fishing Association, among others. !

We are still finding that most people are not aware of Sheephouse Creek or its significance as restoration habitat for the Coho salmon and that it contains Steelhead trout. We have encouraged everyone to obtain and read a copy of the NTMP (or view it online), understand the issues involved, and weigh in with written comments of concern to CDF, Santa Rosa. Could you help with a brief letter of concern, its really important that the community weigh in on this?

Thank you,
Michael Keller
- On behalf of “Friends of Sheephouse Creek”

Two Logging Plans Threaten Sheephouse Creek Watershed

Sheephouse Creek (near Duncans Mills in Sonoma County) is important for its watershed values near the coastal zone as well as an important salmon spawning and rearing area. In addition, there is a current Coho captive broodstock program overseen by the Department of fish and Game.

Sheephouse Creek Boundry Map

A Non-industrial Management Plan (NTMP) for logging of 331 acres and a THP for logging of 81 acres have been filed with CDF (now known as CalFire). Together these plans total 442 acres or 20% of the watershed acreage. If allowed to cut as proposed, these plans together with already approved plans Within the last ten years amount to almost half of the forests in the Sheephouse watershed, creating potential cumulative impacts. Unfortunately, CalFire only does a THP by THP analysis and no real analysis on the broader cumulative impacts within the watershed.

Sheephouse Creek is in danger of being adversely impacted causing, in part, the demise of one of the last few remaining coho streams in Northern California. Currently, the Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is conducting a Coho Salmon Impact Evaluation for Sheephouse Creek. The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has declined to review the plan but sent a letter to Cal Fire stating the critical importance of this habitat area for Coho. It must be pointed out that Cal Fire is the lead agency on approving these plans and has a history of ignoring the professional opinions of other agencies.

Below are links to each logging plan for more information. Also see Activist Corner, this blog, for discussion on what some activists are doing and to get more information to send comments on the plans.

Letters of concern go to:
CDF c/o 135 Ridgeway Avenue,
Santa Rosa, CA. 95402
or at santarosapubliccomment@fire.ca.gov

For the Non-Industrial Management Plan, 1-08-NTMP-004SON, go to:
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/NTMPs2008/1-08NTMP-004SON

For the Timber Harvest Plan, 1-08-025SON, go to:
ftp://thp.fire.ca.gov/THPLibrary/North_Coast_Region/THPs2008/1-08-025SON

Sheephouse Creek Watershed Area
Sheephouse Creek Watershed Area
Past, Present, and Proposed Timber Harvest

Elmer’s favorite poem

In memory of Elmer Dudik Jr. 1947-2008,
this was Elmer’s favorite poem:

Escape

When we get out of the Glass
Bottles of our ego.

And when we escape the
Squirrels turning in
The cages of our
Personality

And get into the forests again
We shall shiver with cold
And fright

But things will happen to us
So that we don’t know
Ourselves.

Cool unlying life will rush in.
And passion will
Make our bodies taut
With power.

We shall stomp our feet
With new power
and old things will fall down.

We shall laugh, and
Institutions will curl up
Like burnt paper.

D.H. Lawrence

Wetland & Riparian Protection Scoping Meeting–Aug. 18

FYI,

Please find attached a Notice of Public Hearing on the CEQA Scoping Meetings on Phase I of the Wetland & Riparian Area Protection Policy which are scheduled for August 18 (Sacramento) and August 20 (Huntington Beach). Comment deadline is September 8, 2008 by 12 p.m.

Thank you,
Jeanine Townsend
Clerk to the Board
State Water Resources Control Board
1001 I Street. 24th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: (916) 341-5600
Fax: (916) 341-5620
E-mail: jtownsend@waterboards.ca.gov

Response to Governor’s Declaration of a State Drought

To dam or not to dam?

Sorry, Arnold, that’s not even the question.

We have to manage our water resources and watersheds as if we had to drink from them for at least the next 150 years.

Minimizing our water demands, protecting our water’s quality, restoring fish and wildlife habitat and populations, increasing efficiencies and creating regionally working solutions are essential to our future.

The governor’s plan won’t do this.

Let the governor and your legislators know that we need to do better. We can’t afford not to.

Thank you,
David Keller
Bay Area Director, Friends of the Eel River

NEWS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Mindy McIntyre, 916 541-8825
June 4, 2008

Planning and Conservation League Issues Statement on Governor’s Declaration of a State Drought

(SACRAMENTO) – The Planning and Conservation League, a leading statewide conservation advocacy coalition, today issued the following statement from Executive Director Traci Sheehan Van Thull regarding Governor Schwarzenegger’s drought proclamation:

“Governor Schwarzenegger’s drought proclamation offers up a challenge – and an opportunity – for all Californians to conserve water and to work together to find new solutions to solve our water problems.

“Unfortunately the Governor’s executive order relies heavily on outdated strategies that have created the very problems we now seek to solve. We encourage the Governor to embrace measures that will allow California to grow without increasing demand on already over-allocated water sources. We need strong policies that can decrease water demand, provide climate-resilient water supplies, and truly provide relief for the communities, fisherman, businesses and ecosystems that are suffering from lack of reliable water.

“More and more residents and businesses are facing severe water rationing in California, while water demands and communities continue to grow. While the Governor’s proclamation references the need to provide water for our growth, his executive order relies heavily on the same sources of water that are now in decline.”

“Measures such as Assembly Member Krekorian’s Water Efficiency Security Act, co-sponsored by the Planning and Conservation League, would help prevent rationing by ensuring growing California communities have the water they need without further increasing water demand on over-burdened water resources. However, despite a groundswell of support from local water agencies, to city councils, community groups and conservation organizations, this pivotal measure failed to gain traction in the State Assembly.

“Ensuring that new growth in California will not lead to increased rationing and exacerbate the pending water crisis is a critical step to solving California’s water crisis. The Planning and Conservation League has a 43-year history of working toward ensuring there is enough water for all Californians, and we pledge to work with Governor Schwarzenegger to ensure that California’s water supply meets the needs for all communities, businesses and the environment – for today and the future.”

###

The Planning and Conservation League, www.pcl.org, partners with hundreds of California environmental organizations to provide a voice in Sacramento for sound planning and responsible environmental policy.

North Bay Water Recycling Program

Dear friends -

The North Bay Water Reuse Authority has gone ahead and just released their Notice of Preparation for the North Bay Water Recycling Program, the subject of HR236 and S1472. They are expediting public meetings next week to solicit comments on the scope of the project, and what should be covered in the Draft EIR. All scoping comments are due by Aug. 25th.

All of our negotiations to get a more meaningful and comprehensive list of Project Objectives were ultimately weakened significantly when SCWA’s and Napa Sanitary District’s representatives to the NBWRA decided in late May that the objectives we had negotiated since January were too detailed and restrictive for them to use in the NOP. The NBWRA’s final Project Objectives list is below.

Marc Holmes (The Bay Institute) urged them and the EIR consultants (Environmental Science Associates, Petaluma) to give us the opportunity for a more detailed discussion of scoping comments, in a special meeting with them. They have agreed to do that, to try to capture our thoughts, critiques, and more detailed objectives.

Our Scoping Meeting with them will be held next week, very likely in Petaluma. The proposed date and time is: Wednesday 8/6, 10 – 11.30 am, Petaluma (location to be determined)
Please confirm your availability a.s.a.p. – email me at my address above, so I’ll know how large a room we need. (if you have a better location central to all of us, please let us know)

This is our next real opportunity to try to shape this project to protect our source waters of the Russian & Eel Rivers and S.R. Plain groundwaters. Please let me know asap of your availability. In part they are using this meeting to gauge our fortitude and the breadth and depth of concern beyond my own presentations to them, so a good turnout with strong comments is very important. This is our chance to tell them what should be included in the Draft EIR. (and get it on the record).

Absent your ability to attend this small group meeting, you will need to get your written comments to SCWA by Aug. 25.

FYI, the Senate bill S1472 (Feinstein) is currently on hold, pending the Bureau of Reclamation’s review of the engineering and financial feasibility, and their recommendation for this project’s eligibility on the Title XVI Water Recycling list of projects. USBR has until 12/23/08 to make that recommendation, but could act earlier (as is being urged by SCWA and other supporters).

As we’ve noted in earlier comments on this project:• This Project would send some 22-30,000 acre feet of recycled water, originally taken from the Eel and Russian Rivers and Santa Rosa Plain groundwater by SCWA and used by its contractor cities, then treated and pumped through a massive pipeline project mostly to benefit grape growers who have overdrafted their local water supplies in southern Sonoma and Napa Valleys and Solano county. We strongly believe that the highest priority for reuse of treated wastewater is to use it locally by cities to greatly reduce current and future urban demands for water from our North Coast rivers, not to create new vineyard customers. This Project dis-incentivizes local reuse by paying dischargers to pump it elsewhere.
• This SCWA-Bureau of Reclamation Project would use 5-11,000 new horsepower for pumps, but deliver only 1400-1459AF/Yr of recycled water to displace potable water demands in Novato and Sonoma. There is no proposal to offset or reduce the GHG generated by this pumping.
• The Project cost is estimated at $311-512M in capital costs, with $10-12M/yr operating costs.
• Support current and future urban reuse needs, instead of relying on new water supplies pumped from the rivers and wells. Displacing potable water now used for irrigating parks, playfields, medians, landscaping, etc, for industrial heating and cooling processes, for instance, as well as for ‘purple plumbing’ for toilets and urinals, should be the first priority for the recycled water.

• As SCWA’s own literature states: “Less is More, any time of the year. Using less water means more water in Lake Mendocino, Lake Sonoma, and the Russian River. We rely on these sources for drinking water, wildlife habitat, and recreational activities.”

The NBay Water Reuse Authority is now also claiming that as wastewater treatment agencies, they have no control over trying to reduce water consumption by the water supplying agencies/contractors, so much of our concern about reducing impacts on source waters is beyond their control. “Not my problem…” Yet, the biggest fish in this pond is SCWA itself, which is the largest water purveyor on the North Coast. We will need to puncture this defensive and myopic institutional view of water resources and restoration.

Thank you for your continued support and hard work to try to make this project a showcase for reuse, instead of a 1950’s style ‘pump and pipe’ project to serve new customers.

David Keller