Monthly Archive for May, 2008

Easy steps to Beat Water ‘Crisis’

California has enough water. Surprised?

We hear endlessly about the “water crisis.” Politicians like Gov. Schwarzenegger and Sen. Feinstein are pushing to build more dams, at a cost of several billions dollars each. Even the Peripheral Canal has resurfaced as a solution to our crisis. But do we really need to pile on to the state’s debt and wait decades for these “solutions” to be built? Isn’t there a quicker, cheaper, smarter answer to our problems?

Let’s be clear. California certainly faces major water challenges like global warming and increased demand. So some people are rushing to build dams — expensive 19th century solutions to 21st century problems. We don’t need solutions that are expensive, destructive and useless. A little common sense shows us that the real answers to our problems are easy, efficient and smart.

Why dams don’t work:

  • Dams are expensive. Dams today are the most expensive option for water, costing billions of dollars each to build and maintain. Taxpayers could end up paying a bill that’s almost 50 times — yes, 50 times! — the cost of smarter solutions.
  • Dams are destructive. California already has lost 90 percent of our river environment. We have lost 95 percent of our salmon and steelhead habitat. Our commercial fisheries — and the communities they once supported — are barely hanging on as it is. Building more dams will only destroy more rivers and more fisheries.
  • Dams are useless. California already has 1,400 dams on our rivers. As a practical matter, there is very little water to collect behind new dams anymore. According to the state, new dams would provide even less reliable water than cloud seeding!

Why common sense does work:

  • Saving water is easy. Conservation really does work. California has cut its per capita water use by 50 percent over the past 40 years, even as the state has boomed. The city of Napa offers free low-flow showerheads, faucet aerators and hose timers to help us reduce our water use. Simply using the tools we already have — like new appliances and drip irrigation — we can easily cut our water use another 20 percent and still support a growing population and even bigger economy.
  • Recycling water is efficient. Why spray clean, clear drinking water on our golf courses and median strips? We can use the rainwater than runs into our storm drains and recycle our wastewater. The Napa Sanitation District last year produced almost 700 million gallons of recycled water, nearly one-third of all the wastewater it treats. It distributed almost half of that to golf courses, and some vineyards and industrial parks use this recycled water as well. The proposed Milliken-Sarco-Tulocay project would be another example of using recycled water for irrigation. Through reclamation and recycling statewide we can save enough drinking water each year for 1.5 million households — roughly all of Los Angeles.
  • Storing water is smart. Every year, enough water for almost 3 million households — one-quarter of all the households in California — disappears into thin air behind our existing dams. It’s much smarter to store our water underground by allowing it to seep into the water table. In fact, we already store enough water underground to fill Hetch Hetchy 15 times over — and there’s room for much, much more.

These three easy steps easily beat billion-dollar dams and canals. Article at the Napa Valley Register

By Tony Bogar - Napa resident works with Friends of the River

SWRCB Workshop on SCWA, Tuesday May 6

RE: SWRCB Workshop on SCWA, Tuesday May 6

Dear all -

We do not yet have a timeline for when the SCWA report Workshop Item #10. Presentation by Sonoma County Water Agency providing comments and status reports on the Agency’s water development projects in the Russian River watershed.

See also agenda items #6 Consideration of the Baseline Enforcement Report, Fiscal Year 2006-2007
and #9 Presentation regarding hydrologic modeling of water diversions from North Coast streams.

As soon as anyone gets some times for potential start times, please post.

David

STATE WATER BOARD
BOARD MEETING
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 – 10:00 a.m.
Coastal Hearing Room – Second Floor
Joe Serna Jr./Cal/EPA Building
1001 I Street, Sacramento

DECLARATION OF A QUORUM
Tam M. Doduc, Chair; Gary Wolff, P.E., Ph.D, Vice Chair; Arthur G. Baggett, Jr., Member;
Charlie Hoppin, Member; Frances Spivy-Weber, Member

BOARD MEETING

Public comments on agenda items will be limited to 5 minutes or otherwise at the discretion of the Board Chair
PUBLIC FORUM

Any member of the public may address and ask questions of the Board relating to any matter within the State Water Board’s jurisdiction provided the matter is not on the agenda, or pending before the State Water Resources Control Board or any California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

BOARD BUSINESS

1. The Board will consider adoption of the April 15, 2008, Board Meeting minutes.

2. Board Member Report

UNCONTESTED ITEMS* (Items 3-5)

*3. Consideration of a proposed Order granting an extension of time to apply water to full beneficial use under permit of Dieter Siegemund/Siegemund Family Trust.
[ Staff Change #1 ]

*4. Consideration of a Resolution authorizing the Executive Director to apply for, accept, and/or amend a federal Clean Water Act section 319(h) grant and authorizing execution and amendment of contracts for support of the nonpoint source program.

*5. Consideration of a Resolution approving supplemental funding for a grant to the County Of Merced for development of a Model Comprehensive Nutrient Management Plan (CNMP) for Confined Animal Operations Using Water Code (WC) §79114.2, added by the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 (2000 Bond Act)

OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT/OFFICE OF RESEARCH, PLANNING & PERFORMANCE

6. Consideration of the Baseline Enforcement Report, Fiscal Year 2006-2007 and information on the proposed Cal/EPA Enforcement Report. (Written comments are due on April 28, 2008 by 12 p.m.)

FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE

7. Consideration of a Resolution to approve $400,000 in Cleanup and Abatement Account funds (CAA) for a Water Quality Enforcement Pilot Project (Pilot Project) for the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Los Angeles Regional Water Board)/

8. Consideration of a Resolution requiring Sustainable Water Resources Management.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

9. Presentation regarding hydrologic modeling of water diversions from North Coast streams.

10. Presentation by Sonoma County Water Agency providing comments and status reports on the Agency’s water development projects in the Russian River watershed.

11. Board Member Organizational Issues - Continued discussions from April 16, 2008 board meeting concerning management of the State Water Resources Control Board and development of the Water Boards’ Strategic Plan Update. No specific items of business will be discussed and no board action will be taken. (Conference Room 2510.)

CLOSED SESSION ITEM
Closed Sessions are not open to the public

The Board will meet in closed session to deliberate on a proposed order concerning petitions for reconsideration of Order WR-2008-0014, which is related to water rights owned by Yuba County Water Agency. This closed session is authorized under Government Code section 11126, subdivision (e).

Important Information!!

Unless otherwise specified, submittal of written comments must be received by 12:00 p.m., April 29, 2008, and will not be accepted after that time.

Submittal of electronic Powerpoint presentations must be received by 12:00 p.m., May 2, 2008, and will not be accepted after that time.

Submittals are to be sent via e-mail to the Clerk to the Board at commentletters@waterboards.ca.gov. Please indicate in the subject line, “5/6/08 BOARD MEETING (fill in bolded subject from appropriate item).” If you have questions about the agenda, contact the Clerk to the Board at (916) 341 5600.

Agenda and items will be available electronically at: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/board_info/calendar/2008.html.

* Items on the uncontested items calendar may be removed at the request of any Board member or person. If an item is removed from the uncontested items calendar, it will only be voted on at this meeting if the Board accepts the staff recommendation for the agenda item. Otherwise, the item will be continued to a subsequent board meeting to allow input by interested persons.

Video broadcast of meetings will be available at: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/Broadcast/.

For a map to our building, visit: http://www.calepa.ca.gov/EPABldg/location.htm. For security purposes, all visitors are required to sign in and receive a badge prior to entering the building. Valid picture identification may be required due to the security level so please allow up to 15 minutes for this process. Individuals who require special accommodations are requested to contact the Office of Employee Assistance, at (916) 341-5881.

SC Water Agency at Water Board May 6–Information

Dear all -

I think that it will be very important for as many people as possible to attend the SWRCB Board Workshop on SCWA’s activities in Sacramento on 5/6 Tuesday, inconvenient though that might be. SCWA will be there in force with a number of contractor/city council members who will speak as well to the wonderful things that SCWA has been doing….

It is important to look at the 5 items below that are the subject of the workshop, and picking one or 2, provide environmental/fisheries stakeholder comments to the Board members - otherwise, they will hear only from the SCWA’s point of view, as usual.

If we can get a more definitive time for the start of the workshop (so far, only known to be ‘after 10.30am’), we’ll get that to you as well.

Briefly, the 5 discussion items are:
1. Decision 1610 and minimum flows in the Russian River
2. SCWA’s Russian River Water Rights Accounting Program
3. Instream flow requirements and unscheduled diversions
4. Salmon Coalition
5. 20% reduction in per capita water use by 2020

Thanks!
David Keller
Bay Area Director
Friends of the Eel River
1327 I St.
Petaluma, CA 94952

State Water Resources Control Board
Division of Water Rights

1001 I Street, 14th Floor ¨ Sacramento, California 95814 ¨ 916.341.53

Linda S. Adams

Secretary for Environmental Protection

Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor

P.O. Box 2000 ¨ Sacramento, California 95812-2000

FAX: 916.341.5400 ¨ www.waterrights.ca.gov

March 13, 2008

Mr. Randy Poole

General Manager/Chief Engineer

Sonoma County Water Agency

P.O. Box 11628

Santa Rosa CA 95406

Dear Mr. Poole:

REQUEST THAT SONOMA COUNTY WATER AGENCY APPEAR BEFORE THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD ON APRIL 15, 2008 TO PROVIDE A STATUS REPORT ON THE AGENCY’S WATER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

The State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board or Board) issued orders in 2004 and again in 2007 approving temporary changes in the instream flow requirements in Sonoma County Water Agency’s (Agency) water right permits. The State Water Board determined that these orders would allow the water stored in Lake Mendocino to be preserved for the fall run of chinook salmon and to meet the water needs of the Agency’s contractors. In response to State Water Board Order WR 2007-0022, the Agency provided reports describing regional efforts to conserve water that were undertaken in Sonoma and Mendocino Counties during the summer of 2007.

The need for these temporary orders and related developments indicate that new water management challenges have arisen in the Russian River watershed. Accordingly, the State Water Board has scheduled a workshop on NOW MAY 6, 2008 [was April 15, 2008] to discuss these challenges. At this workshop the State Water Board is asking the Agency to provide comments on the following issues:

1. When the State Water Board adopted Decision 1610 (D-1610) in 1986, it reserved jurisdiction to modify the instream flow requirements that are specified in this decision and, if necessary, to respond to changes in the operations of Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s Potter Valley Project (PVP). In light of recent changes to PVP operations, should the State Water Board conduct a proceeding to consider amending the D-1610 instream flow requirements?

2. The State Water Board has reviewed the March 2007 workplan for the Russian River Water Rights Accounting Program. The Board further understands that the Agency is developing data and analysis tools to (1) estimate the amounts of water diversion and use throughout the Russian River watershed and (2) determine the water availability for diversions and use under various types of water rights. What is the status of this program and when will it be completed?

3. The reports filed by the Agency pursuant to WR 2007-0022 state that although the Agency is required to maintain Russian River and Dry Creek instream flows, diversions of water from the Russian River and Dry Creek by other water users, particularly agricultural users, are not scheduled or coordinated to coincide with the instream flow requirements that the Agency is attempting to maintain. These unscheduled diversions impair efficient management of the area’s limited water resources, particularly the water stored in Lake Mendocino. What can the State Water Board, the Agency and the water users do to address this problem?

4. The State Water Board is aware of several ongoing community efforts in the Russian River watershed. During the proceeding held in conjunction with the Agency’s 2007 request for temporary change, the State Water Board received presentations from federal, state and local government agencies and non-governmental parties. These presentations outlined (1) the coordination efforts of the Salmon Coalition and Dry Creek Water Agricultural Water Users, and (2) the water conservation work done by Dr. Mark Greenspan with the agricultural community. Provide a status update of these and any other successful community efforts which may assist in water resource management within the Russian River watershed.

5. Recently Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has indicated that he will direct state agencies to develop a plan to achieve a statewide 20 percent reduction in per capita water use by 2020. Provide an explanation of the Agency’s authority to impose mandatory conservation measures and identify the persons and entities that may be subject to that authority. Identify steps the Agency can take to develop an aggressive plan and implementation procedures to achieve the Governor’s goal of a 20 percent reduction in per capita water use by 2020.

The State Water Board will provide public notice of this workshop item and will accept public comments on these issues. The Board may also consider follow up actions.

Sincerely,

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY

Victoria A. Whitney

Division Chief

cc: Barbara Spazek, Executive Director

Mendocino County Russian River Flood Control
and Water Conservation Improvement District

151 Laws Avenue, Suite D

Ukiah, CA 95482

Roland Sanford, General Manager

Mendocino County Water Agency

890 North Bush Street, Room 20

Ukiah, CA 95482
Steven Edmondson

National Marine Fisheries Service

777 Sonoma Ave. Rm 325

Santa Rosa, CA 95404

Bob Klamt

North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board

5550 Skylane Blvd, Suite A

Santa Rosa, CA 95403

Gary B. Stacey, Regional Manager Northern Region

California Department of Fish and Game

601 Locust Street

Redding, CA 96001

Chuck Armor, Regional Manager

Bay Delta Region

California Department of Fish and Game

P.O. Box 47

Yountville, CA 94599

Potter Valley Irrigation District

P. O. Box 186

Potter Valley, CA 95469

bcc: Board Members

Dorothy Rice

Tom Howard

Sherrera:jmtipps 03.13.08

U:\PERDRV\SHerrera\April 15-08 workshop Sonoma County WA invite.d