Monthly Archive for January, 2008

Book: California Water II by Solano Press

I am please do let you all know that Solano Press has their new water book out - CALIFORNIA WATER II

For those of use who work in water, fishery, and forestry resources, this book will be a great help - meaning we all should own a copy.

From Water Rights (riparian and appropriative) to Endangered Species implications and the responsibilities of the State and Regional Boards - this book is well organized to help interested parties understand and apply the law.

Very much like another Solano Press publication, The Forest Practice Act and Related Laws (another indispensable publication for those interested in forest practices with good grounding and references in CEQA, ESA, and the Clean Water Act), activists will be much more effective owning a copy of CALIFORNIA WATER LAW II.

Please review attachments - Announcement and Table of Contents.

You can contact Solano Press at spbooks@solano.com or by phone at 1-800-931-9373

Alan Levine

How to Construct Rain Gardens to Save Water

Rain Gardens
BY VALERIE SUDOL

If you haven’t heard of rain gardens yet, it’s time to catch up with
the latest way to give purpose to your plantings.

Briefly defined, a rain garden is a shallow basin filled with native
plants that is designed to trap and filter rainwater. It captures
runoff from roofs, driveways and pavement that otherwise would find
its way to storm sewers, streams and, ultimately, our water supply –
complete with a freight of pollutants.

A rain garden is not a pond, since a well-built one will drain
completely in a day or so as water percolates through the soil and
recharges underground aquifers. Think of it as a compact bit of
man-made wetlands acting to neutralize contaminants that compromise
water quality in our reservoirs, lakes, rivers and bays. (Runoff
typically carries fertilizers, pesticides, motor oil and other
chemicals flushed from lawns and roadways.)

Like natural wetlands, rain gardens can control flooding, too,
especially in a built-up, paved-over state like ours. By keeping
water out of overburdened drainage systems, rain gardens curb the
flash floods and erosion that often result from heavy downpours.

“In rain gardens, personal gardening meets public water policy,” says
Isaac Martin, vice president of the Native Plant Society of New
Jersey and owner of Ladybug Landscaping LLC in Freehold. “This is a
great way to solve any number of problems at once.”

Larry Coffman, associate director of the Maryland Department of
Environmental Resources, is widely credited with developing the rain
garden concept in Prince George’s County, Md. in 1990.

Coffman worked with developer Dick Brinker to design a 300- to
400-square-foot bioretention area on the property of each home in one
new subdivision. This network of planted drainage basins cost about
$100,000 — $300,000 less than the standard curbs, gutters and storm
drains. The term “rain garden” came into use because it sounded more
appealing than “bioretention area” or “planted drainage basin,” and
an environment-friendly idea was launched.

Besides contributing to the health of public watersheds, rain gardens
have other positive values. Planted with native species adapted to
extremes of climate and fluctuating moisture levels, rain gardens are
oases for wildlife. If you build one, the bees, butterflies,
hummingbirds and dragonflies will come — but not the mosquitoes. By
drying out quickly, rain gardens deny these pests the standing water
their eggs need to mature and hatch, a process that takes at least a
week.

So, what looks like a simple patch of wildflowers can be a
hard-working flood-preventing, water-purifying, wildlife-attracting,
mosquito-killing supergarden that works in just about any residential
or commercial setting. The idea is so appealing and so effective that
it is catching on in many states, including Wisconsin, Michigan,
Pennsylvania and Missouri. Kansas City, Mo. has launched a campaign
to see “10,000 Rain Gardens” built over the next decade.

The Native Plant Society, headquartered at Cook College in New
Brunswick, is among the organizations promoting the rain garden
concept in New Jersey. At the group’s Web site, www.npsnj.org, you
can download a 35-page pamphlet that walks you through planning and
construction, recommends sources for native plants and even offers
eight rain garden designs suitable for the soil conditions found in
the state.

The Rutgers Cooperative Extension Service is getting into the act,
too. The extension’s Middlesex County office has built a
demonstration rain garden at its EARTH Center in South Brunswick.
Visitors are welcome to check it out any day during daylight hours.

RAIN GARDENS MUST BE located to intercept and temporarily hold
drainage water from roofs, downspouts and paving. Beyond that, they
are open to interpretation.

“You can get creative from there,” says Martin, who has installed a
half-dozen rain gardens in Monmouth and Ocean County this year. “They
are getting more popular as people realize that this is gardening
with a purpose.”

Bill Young, a fellow society member who lives in Point Pleasant,
installed a rain garden to process water pumped from his backyard
pool, which relies on biofilters rather than chlorination for
cleanliness. At the end of the season, Young can discharge pool water
into an area planted with species that don’t mind getting their
“feet” wet periodically.

Some homeowners build rain gardens near downspouts to slow the flow
from gutters or near sump pump outfalls to process water lifted from
basements. Others put them in their side yards, where the garden
becomes a privacy screen obscuring the view of nearby houses. Another
option is to locate these gardens in front yards, between
water-shedding surfaces such as roofs and driveways and storm drains
in the street.

What all rain gardens have in common is a shallow, level-bottomed
depression excavated about 6 inches below the surrounding grade.
Excavated soil is used to create a berm so water doesn’t flow in the
uphill end of the basin and out the downhill side, creating gullies.

It helps to know the composition of your soil and its drainage
characteristics — and here’s where a soil test available for about
$10 from your county extension service office is a big help. The
basin should be backfilled with a mix that water will pass through
readily. A good formula is 50 percent sand, 30 percent excavated soil
and 20 percent decayed leaves (leaf mold), often available free from
municipal composting operations.

As for size, 150 to 300 square feet is generally recommended.
Ideally, the size of the garden should relate to the size of the roof
area or driveway being drained, but even smaller rain gardens will be
an asset.

The location you choose should be at least 20 feet from the
foundation of homes with basements to prevent water from getting into
cellars. Shallow, grass-covered ditches or perforated plastic pipe
can lead water to the rain garden. Any outfall from the planted basin
designed to carry overflow from big storms should direct water away
from the house, too.

After the rain garden is excavated, filled with suitable soil and
planted, the final step is to cover the soil surface with an organic
mulch. Shredded hardwood bark is recommended as a good trap for heavy
metals and other contaminants; it won’t float and wash away as wood
chips tend to do.

Costs will vary depending on the number and species of plants you
need and whether you do the digging yourself or hire it out.
Typically, you can build a 150-square-foot garden for $300 or so,
including soil amendments and mulch. Hiring a designer will assure an
eye-catching result, but will add to the price.

Choosing plants for the rain garden is “the fun part,” says Martin,
and a process likely to introduce you to beautiful, undemanding
species not commonly found in the aisles of most home centers. Native
turtleheads, Joe Pye weed and meadow rue bear lovely flowers.
Cardinal flower (Lobelia cardinalis) and jewelweed attract
hummingbirds. Native grasses and sedges offer year-round foliage
accents.

“People have to stop thinking in terms of the overly familiar
evergreens and perennials you see in every yard,” Martin says. “They
need to develop a new aesthetic.”

The beauty of a rain garden is a bonus, a reward above and beyond the
satisfaction that comes from being part of the waste water solution
instead of part of the problem. When your new garden is aflutter with
birds and butterflies, when a great blue heron stops by for lunch or
a frog appears for a drink and a dip, your yard will seem like a more
hospitable place. You may even find yourself hoping for a rainy day
to fill your garden — and your sense of satisfaction — to the brim.

Rain garden resources

Native Plant Society, Office of Continuing Professional Education,
Cook College, 102 Ryders Lane, New Brunswick, N.J. 08901. Visit
www.npsnj.org for a PDF file that describes rain garden construction.

WikiHow, a do-it-yourself Web site, has a “How to Create a Rain
Garden” manual that takes you step-by-step through the process at
www.wikihow.com/Create-a-Rain-Garden.

“Rain Gardens: A How-to Manual for Homeowners” is worth checking out
at http://clean-water.uwex.edu/pubs/raingarden/rgmanual.pdf.

“Rain Gardens: Managing Water Sustainably in the Garden and Designed
Landscape,” by Nigel Dunnett and Andy Clayden (Timber Press, 2007) is
a recently published book on the subject.

Things to do,

things to avoid

What to do

Before you start digging, find out where your underground utilities
are located — it’s the law. Call (800) 272-1000 for a free mark-out.
Use unimproved native plant species, not hybrids, which generally
carry a specific name in quotes. For example, look for Asclepias
incarnata, the common swamp milkweed rather than Asclepias incarnata
‘Ice Ballet’ or ‘Cinderella.’ Natives evolved with local wildlife;
hybrids are products of human breeding.

Put the most moisture-tolerant plants in the center of the garden
where water lingers longest and the more drought-tolerant types
around the margins, which dry out first.

Water plants for the first season until roots become established.
Natural rainfall should be sufficient in later years.

Incorporate native grasses and sedges for low-maintenance cover. Some
designers say these should represent two-thirds of the plants in your
rain garden.

Keep your rain garden looking neat by giving it well-defined edges. A
surrounding of mowed grass or a border of flat stones will impose a
sense of order.

What not to do

Avoid locating your rain garden under large trees whose roots may be
damaged by excavation.

Don’t use species that will tower over you when mature. A
14-foot-tall reed will look out of place in a suburban yard.

Pesticides and herbicides have no role in a rain garden and will harm
the wildlife you are trying to attract. Hand weed until the plants
you’ve selected knit together.

Avoid placing rain gardens too close to house or garage foundations.
Put them 20 to 30 feet away from structures with basements and at
least 10 feet away from structures built on slabs.

Don’t over-feed rain garden plants. Most native species don’t require
fertilizer.

Don’t put rain gardens directly over septic drainfields of near
wells. Roots can infiltrate and compromise the function of these
utilities.

Water Collection Alternatives in Santa Rosa

While the City of Santa Rosa has significant problems to contend with in dealing with their own Treated Wastewater NPDES permit, impaired conditions on Santa Rosa Creek and the Laguna de Santa Rosa, and management of their current Stormwater Plan; the City is busy stepping on its own tail by refusing to deal with (by having a reasonable plan) rain water collection systems.

Rain water collection systems can go a long way in solving many problems - appurtenant to issues listed above. Rain water collection systems that collect and retain water during peak hydrologic events can effect changes to the hydrograph and thus eliminate flooding during peak flow events. This would also help with the control of pollutants introduced to surface water during such events. Collection of rain water can also help lower water demand ( another the City is facing).

So what is the City of Santa Rosa doing? The City has policy in place that forces issuance of permit for such collection systems. Not only is a permit need, a fee for the permit is assessed. How is this permitting and fee system going to encourage change towards development of collection systems.

Is this fee and permit system fair? The rational behind the permit and fee system is maintain and protect public health by assuring that such collection systems are not connected to potable water systems. That sounds reasonable. But! When you want to implement your newly proposed system for use of recycled waste water are you going to implement the same standards - permits, fees, backflow devices, and yearly inspections. If you do, you can forget about use of recycled water for landscape irrigation. It is infinitely more likely that recyled water, in pipes (rather than rain water collected in tanks), could be connected to potable water systems (by accident or design).

What about pools? Why do pool owners not need backflow devices and inspections. The system seem a little out of wack.

What I am suggesting is more though. I (we) are looking for you to devise some reasonable solution. Alternatives should be looked at and adjustments in policly should be made.

Alan Levine

S.C. GP Deliberations Tuesday, Jan. 15, 2:15 pm

Hello all-

This Tuesday is the beginning of the end of the Sonoma County General
Plan! Please come out to remind the Supervisors that they are being watched!
Tuesday, January 15th at 2:15, in the Board of Supervisors chambers,
575 Administration Blvd in Santa Rosa

On December 11, the Board of Supervisors began their deliberations on
the County General Plan with non-controversial issue areas. They
passed all of the staff recommendations on straw votes of 4-1 (Kelley
was absent).

On Tuesday, the Board will meet again to begin diving into the most
important issues facing our county in the next 20 years: climate
change, water supply availability and cleanliness, protection of
farmlands and open space from development, and many other issues.
Greenbelt Alliance and our coalition partners have actively
petitioned the Board throughout the entire six-year process in order
to see strong policies put into place to protect the quality of life
in Sonoma County. On January 15, we will have the chance to see
whether the Board will make the right decisions for our future.

Please come and remind the Board who their decisions will affect!
See you there,
Daisy

Daisy Pistey-Lyhne

Sonoma-Marin Field Representative
Greenbelt Alliance
555 5th Street, Ste. 300B
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(707) 575-3661
fax: (707) 575-4275
daisypl@greenbelt.org

Time Is Running Out To Conserve Water

San Francisco Chronicle
By Nealan Afsari, Bay Area attorney and former broadcast news writer

Santa Rosa Water Use Graph

Among the environmental catchphrases we hear these days, like “climate change” and “global warming,” the less uttered phrase “water conservation” needs to be injected back into the discourse on environmental conservation. Just this month, Georgia Governor Sonny Perdue led a public prayer on the steps of the state Capitol, in the hopes of summoning a storm to bring the drought-stricken state and other parts of the South much-needed water. And that was not the first call to prayer - Alabama Governor Bob Riley declared a week in July “Days of Prayer for Rain.”

I would probably pray too if, like some residents of the tri-state area of Georgia, Alabama, and Florida, I was told that I may not have water to drink, bathe in, or wash my hands with, after year end. That is the projection for the city of Atlanta, where I once lived. My friend’s father told me that, like many locals, they are taking shorter showers, shutting off the faucet more quickly, and are not watering their yard. While not all residents have made such changes, he said of his family’s new approach, “We definitely can no longer take an endless supply of cheap and safe drinking water for granted.”

The water supply is on the minds of California’s government officials and environmental planners as well, who recently convened for the annual California Water Policy Conference. Our water supply, and what we as individuals can do to preserve it, also needs to be on the minds of Californians. While we may not have the power to make decisions regarding water allocation, or to push technology forward, we have one great power - we can stop using so much water.

I will admit that I am slightly sensitive about wasteful water use, cringing at the water lost when someone brushes their teeth leisurely while the faucet runs, or running the faucet while cleaning the kitchen - not just the dishes - after a meal.

Knowing that much of California’s conservation efforts are aimed at the agricultural sector which, at about 78 percent of California’s total water use, is the state’s greatest drain on the water supply, I wondered: Do individual Californians need to conserve water? How do we use or waste water? And what can we change about our habits to save water?

I decided to ask the experts those questions, and the answers show that individuals should not discount the potential effects of their conservation efforts.

The latest numbers put residential indoor and outdoor water use at 3.75 million acre-feet, according to the Pacific Institute in Oakland, a leader in the analysis of our state’s water system. That is between 43 percent and 54 percent of the state’s total urban water use, which means that households can directly affect about half of the state’s water supply directed toward urban use.

California’s Department of Water Resources says 25 percent of water used in landscaping is wasted, and the Department points to toilets, clothes washers, and showers as the top three sources of indoor water use. By using spray nozzle hoses outdoors, and indoors repairing leaks, installing low flow showerheads and low flow flush toilets, and purchasing high efficiency washing machines, the department believes we can markedly lower residential water use. And the effect of such cut is two-fold - water is saved, and so is the energy used to convey, treat, and deliver the water.

Win-win, right? A major obstacle though is getting Californians to change their habits. After all, why conserve? The Pacific Institute has the simple answer: “the way we use water today is not sustainable - environmentally or politically.”

Right now, water flows to Californians easily and plentifully. But if we individually and collectively show a greater respect for the value of water, use less of it when it is not necessary, and begin to employ available water-efficient technologies, our conservation now may prevent us from having to pray later.

Comment on Is Water Wasting to the Sea?

Just as I sent out the announcement for the book CALIFORNIA WATER, the Governor, in his state of the State address, said we need to do something about water wasting to the sea.

As the State has just noticed its Draft Policy for Maintaining Instream Flows in Northern California Coastal Streams it appears others want our water for future use in developed areas.

The fact that agriculture uses 80% of the water in the state and not all of this use is high efficiency use - were small percentages of conservation can yield big water savings for future use; seems to be escaping the consciousness of the Governor and others who want the water that belongs in our streams and rivers.

Alan Levine

Take Action for Northcoast Rivers and Salmon

Dear supporters of our North Coast Rivers and Salmon:

A US Senate vote will happen very soon on S.1472, the North Bay Water Reuse Program Act (Feinstein, Boxer). This project would send some 22-30,000 acre feet of recycled water, originally taken from the Eel and Russian Rivers and Santa Rosa Plain groundwater by SCWA and used by its contractor cities, then treated and pumped through a massive pipeline project mostly to benefit grape growers who have overdrafted their local water supplies in southern Sonoma and Napa Valleys and Solano county. We strongly believe that the highest priority for reuse of treated wastewater is to use it locally by cities to greatly reduce current and future urban demands for water from our North Coast rivers, not to create new vineyard customers.

This SCWA-Bureau of Reclamation Project would use 5-11,000 new horsepower for pumps, but deliver only 1400-1459AF/Yr of recycled water to displace potable water demands in Novato and Sonoma. The Project cost is estimated at $311-512M in capital costs, with $10-12M/yr operating costs.

Opposition to the bills have come from Friends of the Eel River, Sonoma County Water Coalition, O.W.L. Foundation, Sonoma County Conservation Action and the Sonoma League of Women Voters. No North Coast river and fisheries stakeholders were consulted in developing the Program or the legislation. The Bureau of Reclamation itself testified that the Program’s legislation is premature. Yet, the House has already passed its version of the legislation (HR236, Thompson, Woolsey).

We need your messages to convince Senators Feinstein and Boxer to withdraw S.1472 now. The bill can then be re-written to address North Coast concerns. Please pass this Action Alert to your friends and organization members ASAP.

The following message should be sent now by as many people to both Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer. You can write your own notes, or add your own comments. Your voice will count here!

Due to mail screening processes, letters mailed to the D.C. Senate offices are significantly delayed.
It is best then to either write to their local SF offices, or phone, fax or email your comments to their DC offices.

Thank you!
Friends of the Eel River

—————————–
to: Senator Dianne Feinstein
One Post Street, Suite 2450
San Francisco, CA 94104
Phone: (415) 393-0707
Washington DC Phone: (202) 224-3841
DC Fax: (202) 228-3954
Email: fill in the form at http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUs.EmailMe

to: Senator Barbara Boxer
1700 Montgomery St., Suite 240
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 403-0100
Washington DC Phone: (202) 224-3553
DC Fax: (202) 228-2382
Email: fill in the form at https://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm

Dear Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer:

I strongly oppose your bill, S.1472 North Bay Water Reuse Program Act. This bill takes critical water supplies originating in the Eel and Russian Rivers and Santa Rosa Plain groundwater and, after it is used in cities and turned it into highly treated wastewater, then pumps it eastward to benefit mostly grape growers in Napa, Solano and southern Sonoma counties who have overdrafted their local water supplies.

This recycled water should instead be used closer to home, to greatly reduce current and future urban demands for water from our North Coast rivers, home of endangered Coho and Chinook salmon and Steelhead. This massive pumping project will also add huge greenhouse gas emissions at a time when we must be reducing them.

North Coast river and fishery citizen stakeholders were not consulted or involved in developing the Program and S.1472.

I urge you to withdraw S.1472 now, before worsening an already desperate situation.

Sincerely,
/s/ Name, address, ZIP.

Customers Sought for Treated Wastewater

By BLEYS W. ROSE
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Laguna Wastewater Plant

Laguna Wastewater Plant

Sonoma County Water Agency representatives are knocking on doors in the Guerneville and Forestville areas in search of landowners willing to have treated wastewater sprayed on their property.

The search is on, prompted by approval by county supervisors of an environmental impact report on a project that would funnel treated wastewater from the Guerneville sewage plant through more than 30 miles of pipeline.

Supervisors’ certification of the EIR means the Water Agency can start applying for state funding for the project, which as yet has neither a designated route nor cost estimate.

That the agency doesn’t have customers lined up or know where the pipeline will be laid doesn’t concern county officials.

“We have not defined what the project is, and the staff is continuing to define those properties,” said Supervisor Mike Reilly, who represents the west county. “I am confident that we will not need 36 miles of pipeline and that we will be a lot closer (to the treatment plant).”

The size and scope of the Russian River County Sanitation District Irrigation Reliability and Beneficial Reuse Project was criticized by some west county residents and environmental activists during public hearings earlier this year. They argued that the Water Agency’s plan is too large in comparison with the scale of the problem of disposing of treated wastewater from Russian River communities.

The agency’s environmental impact report came up with two routes for a pipeline, both of which attracted opposition.

One proposal sends 12 miles of pipe along River Road from the Guerneville treatment plant to northern Forestville. The other routes a 20-mile pipeline along Green Valley Road to southern Forestville.

The west county has a wastewater disposal problem because about 3,300 homes in river communities stretching from Monte Rio to Guerneville to Rio Nido need a place to dispose of treated effluent during summer months.

The North Coast Water Quality Control Board allows wastewater dumping in the Russian River during winter months, but prohibits release during summer months when river flow is lower and less forceful.

Currently, the Water Agency disperses the Guerneville plant’s treated wastewater on 70 acres of nearby properties. But that’s not enough space to handle all of it, so the agency is looking for about 90 acres elsewhere to irrigate, or about 1,200 to 1,600 acres of vineyards.

“Because of the nature of the geology, we are looking at municipal use; people that have a vegetable garden or forest land they want watered; people that have cattle to graze or wine grapes to grow,” Water Agency project manager Jeff Church said.

Church said the agency’s survey turned up 66 landowners interested in using recycled water.

Water Agency engineer Damien O’Bid said the agency is looking for landowners receptive to the potential for irrigating their property and has contacted real estate agents who may know of property for sale in the Guerneville area.

“The pipeline would be only built to accommodate the need,” O’Bid said. “Our preference is to build as close to the plant as possible.”

Church said the twin pipeline proposal seems ambitious because the agency has to “account for current and future needs.”

“Building as close to the plant will address immediate need, and later we would take up future need,” Church said.

Water Agency officials said the project will not require upgrades to Guerneville’s treatment plant.

You can reach Staff Writer Bleys W. Rose at 521-5431 or bleys.rose@pressdemocrat.com.

The IRWP

From the OWL Foundation

The Incremental Recycled Water Project (IRWP) is a plan to dump “treated” sewage in the Russian River, the Geyers hotsprings and also in large, open reservoirs. This “treated” water, which is dangerous, will then be used for agricultural irrigation, watering lawns, and other domestic uses that do not require potable water. The IRWP represents an agreement between the cities of Santa Rosa, Rohnert Park, Cotati and Sebastopol. All these cities have accumulated an embarrassing amount of sewage that requires disposal, an avoidable problem created by excessive growth that ignored the water balance of supply and demand.

How dangerous is this? The Russian River is also Sonoma County’s largest source of fresh water. Three of the planned dump sites are above Sonoma County Water Agency (”SWCA”) collectors for drinking water.

The plan also ignores recent scientific discoveries that demonstrate wastewater is a source of emerging toxicants. In other words, wastewater itself is creating entirely new poisonous compounds by combining the dangerous material it necessarily contains.

Below are O.W.L.’s comments and questions to the Board of Public Utilities of Santa Rosa for the scoping session of the IRWP EIR.

http://owlfoundation.net/IRWP_letter.html

Meeting on Pipeline Project in West Sonoma County

From Brenda:

In a message dated 1/5/2008 1:47:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, rrwpc-1@comcast.net writes:

Hi everyone!

Here’s the agenda (pasted below) for the Camp Meeker Rec & Park Dept. this coming Tuesday. There is a very important discussion on the Certification of the EIR for the Pipeline Project to RRCSD on their agenda. Those concerned about this issue should attend. Also there will be an interesting discussion on Public Records Act.

Hope to see you there.

Brenda

Notice Of the Regular Public Meeting Of the Board of Directors of the Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District

Tuesday, January 08, 2008, 7:00 pm

ANDERSON HALL, CAMP MEEKER, CALIFORNIA

I. Call To Order

II. Roll Call

III. Approval Of Agenda

IV. Statements Of Abstention

V. Public Comment The public may address the Board of topics NOT covered by this agenda. Testimony is limited to three minutes. Please state you name and where you are from so that this information can be entered into the minutes.

VI. Consent Items
A. Approval of Minutes
1. Minutes of December 11, 2007
B. Payment of Claims
C. Administrative and Financial Report

VII. ACTION AGENDA

A. FINAL REVIEW AND ACTION OF THE CAMP MEEKER RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT TO CONSIDER CERTIFYING THE CAMP MEEKER/OCCIDENTAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION PROJECT FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (”SEIR”).

DESCRIPTION: The Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Camp Meeker/Occidental Wastewater Reclamation Project is complete. The public review and comment period has expired and responses have been generated and incorporated into the SEIR. The required actions taken under the California Environmental Quality Act (”CEQA”) have all been accomplished, except for the final review and certification by the Board of Directors of the Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District, the Lead Agency under CEQA.

PROPOSED ACTION: The Board will discuss the SEIR and following that, vote whether to certify the SEIR as adequate in addressing the environmental impacts of the proposed project, all pursuant to California law and CEQA.

Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda January 8, 2008 Page Two

B. REVIEW WATER ACCOUNT POLICY/RESOLUTION 2008-002

DESCRIPTION: The Board will be asked to review policy recommendations from the Water Operator with respect to customer billing situations and arrearages.

PROPOSED ACTION: The Board may/may not adopt policies related to customer billing situations and arrearages.

C. ELECTION OF BOARD OFFICERS

DESCRIPTION: The Board will nominate and vote for members to fill the positions of President, Vice-President and Secretary-Treasurer for the calendar year 2008.

PROPOSED ACTION: The Board will elect a slate of officers for the 2008 calendar year.

D. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC RECORDS ACT.

DESCRIPTION: Occidental resident, Bill Wadsworth, has requested that the Board address his Public Records Act requests. The District¹s Attorney will overview the legal requirements of that Act. The Board will discuss the issues.

ACTION: None. This is a discussion item.

E. CONTRACT APPROVAL POST OFFICE LEASE

DESCRIPTION: The Board will review the lease for the post office/trailer from the United States Post Office.

PROPOSED ACTION: The Board may/may not take further action on this matter.

F. CORRESPONDENCE FROM LYNN WATSON: ADOPTION OF ³THE PRECAUTIONARY PRINCIPLE.²

DESCRIPTION: The Board received a letter from Lynn Watson requesting adoption of a ³Precautionary Principle.² There was no description of this with or in the body of the letter. . PROPOSED ACTION: The Board will take input and may/may not take any action on this request.

IX. MONTHLY REPORT OF WATER SYSTEM OPERATOR

DESCRIPTION: Water System Operator will report on operations for the current month.

X. DIRECTORS REPORTS

Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District Board of Directors Meeting Agenda January 8, 2008 Page Three

XII. CLOSED/EXECUTIVE SESSION

A. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ­ POTENTIAL LITIGATION (Subdivision c., Government Code Section 54956.9) There are two matters to be considered.

XIII. ADJOURN CLOSED SESSION

XIV. ADJOURNMENT

How to Get an Item on the Agenda Items for the agenda of the regular meetings of the Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District must be submitted to the District in writing. Regular meetings are held the 2nd Tuesday of each month. The District must receive submissions no later than ten (10) calendar days before the meeting. Submit your agenda items to: Camp Meeker Recreation and Park District, Post Office Box 461, Camp Meeker, CA 95419. Be sure to include your name, address and phone number. Anonymous submissions will not be considered for discussion.