Archive for November, 2007

PHOTO OF SF BAY SHOWS IMPACTS OF OIL SPILL

Check out the satellite picture of the spill - it gets around unfortunately

- Don

NEW SATELLITE PHOTO OF SAN FRANCISCO BAY SHOWS IMPACTS OF OIL SPILL

Unique image released today by conservation groups

The new photo shows numerous dark slicks around the Bay itself, as well as on the nearby open ocean, consistent with reports of oil appearing around the region and with beach closures at that time. The image was taken by the Radarsat-1 satellite, operated by MDA
Geo-spatial Services Inc., at 6 a.m. Pacific time on November 12.Processing of the image data was sponsored by Defenders of Wildlife, Ocean Conservancy, San Francisco Baykeeper, and SkyTruth. Image processing and analysis was conducted on behalf of the sponsoring conservation groups by SkyTruth.

“We need to learn from the recent spill in order to increase society’s efforts at prevention. That’s why we’ve worked together to obtain this image and show it to the public,” said Richard Charter, with the Government Relations Program of Defenders of Wildlife. “San
Francisco Bay and the surrounding coastal waters represent one of the most productive and sensitive marine ecosystems on the planet, and we cannot leave their fate to the whims of oil spills moving on currents,
tides, and wind ever again.”

“This photo confirms that containing the oil in the first two hours is 100 times more important than chasing it all over the San Francisco Bay for the next two weeks”, said Warner Chabot, Vice President of Ocean Conservancy. “Our failure to contain the oil has created a catastrophe with a likely $100 million dollar price tag.”

“This new image seems to confirm Baykeeper’s experience patrolling the Bay by boat this week, where we witnessed widespread oil contamination,” said Deb Self, Executive Director of San Francisco Baykeeper. “If the oil has spread as widely as this satellite image
suggests, we may be looking at long-term harmful impacts to our critical tidal marshes in the South Bay.”

The Radarsat image shows San Francisco Bay as it looked on November 12, five days after the Cosco Busan struck a support pillar of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, spilling 58,000 gallons of heavy fuel oil. According to John Amos, President of SkyTruth and an
experienced radar analyst, the satellite image shows dark gray streaks and patches that are consistent with the appearance of oil slicks, including both very thin “sheens” and possibly thicker, isolated pockets of oil that remained in the area five days after the
spill.

The satellite image demonstrates that floating oil was widely transported around the Bay area in just a few days time, and that as of November 12, oily patches apparently remained in many areas. Built-up urban areas, port facilities, and bridges appear very bright in the image, while clean water is medium-gray.

The Radarsat image can be viewed and downloaded for publication or
video broadcast at the following website:

http://skytruth.mediatools.org/objects/view.acs?object_id=11286

Photo provided by Defenders of Wildlife, Ocean Conservancy, San Francisco Baykeeper, and SkyTruth, from image taken by the Radarsat-1 satellite, operated by MDA Geospatial Services Inc.

Image by SkyTruth, Copyright 2007 — All rights reserved. RSAT-1 image data copyright MDA Geospatial Services Inc. Please contact SkyTruth (info@skytruth.org) for more information. JPEG format, 100dpi at 14″ x 17″ (a 200 dpi version is also available).

Don McEnhill

NC Regional Water Board’s Sediment Plan

The Regional Board has extended the time period for comment to December 14. You now have more time.

Read below and down to, including, extension notice from Rebecca Fitzgerald - Regional Water Quality Control Board.

Interested Parties - Impaired Rivers - Albion River, Eel River, Elk River Watershed, Estero Americano, Freshwater Creek, Garcia River, Gualala River, Jacoby Creek,  Klamath River, Mad River, Mattole River, Noyo River, Redwood Creek, Russian River, Scott River, Stemple Creek, Ten Mile River, Trinity River.
The Regional Boards Sediment Work Plan - Basin Plan Amendment is now out for review.

Actions are included to address issue on impaired waterbodies on the north coast that are subject to EPA TMDLs, but are not subject to related implementation planning.

Actions are cataloged and referenced to each specific waterbody. It might be prudent to review such actions suggested by the work plan for the waterbody(s) of your specific concern.

You might make comment on enforceability of actions, time period to implementation, likelyhood of implementation given Regional Board staffing and time lines.

This action needs to be reviewed and commented on - by Dec -14th.  I have fallen behind. I will try and get something out - early next week.

This plan is 243 pages long.  Links are noticed - below.

The due date for submission of written comments on the Work Plan to Control Excess Sediment in Sediment-Impaired Watersheds (the Work Plan) has been extended by two weeks to Friday, December 14, 2007.
The Work Plan to Control Excess Sediment in Sediment-Impaired Watersheds (the Work Plan) is available for public review at

http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast/programs/basinplan/sediment_workplan.html .
Alan Levine

USGS Examines Importance of Water Budgets in Addressing Water Availability Concerns

A new USGS Circular illustrates the importance of water budgets as an essential tool in addressing concerns about water availability in the 21st Century.

Ensuring sustainable water supplies requires an understanding of the hydrologic cycle. Water budgets enable an accounting of water as it moves through Earth’s atmosphere, land surface and subsurface. This tool provides a quantitative basis for assessing how a natural or human-induced change in one part of the hydrologic cycle may affect other aspects of the cycle. The new USGS circular demonstrates how water budgets provide a foundation for effective water-resource and environmental planning and management.

“Through this Circular, the USGS seeks to broaden awareness and understanding of water budgets and the hydrologic cycle. We hope this Circular will help natural resource professionals, public decision-makers and citizens to better understand water budgets and to use that understanding to promote the wise use and management of a most precious resource - water.” said Robert M. Hirsch, Chief Hydrologist for the USGS.

The report describes the value of water budgets through examples representing a variety of geographic areas and water-resources issues. Some examples in the report include: the High Plains, Lake Seminole and the Appalachicola River, Upper Klamath Lake, the San Pedro River and the Chicago metropolitan area. Uncertainties that exist in water budgets are presented to provide an appreciation of the complex nature of evaluating how much water may be available for human and environmental needs. The study is relevant to a number of fields including agriculture, meteorology, climatology, aquatic ecology, mining, water supply, ground water management, flood control, reservoir management, wetland and riparian ecology, and pollution control.

The Circular “Water Budgets: Foundations for Effective Water-Resources and Environmental Management” is available online at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2007/1308/.

Basin Plan Amendment on Sediment for Review

The Regional Boards Sediment Work Plan - Basin Plan Amendment is now out for review.

Actions are included to address issue on impaired waterbodies on the north coast that are subject to EPA TMDLs, but are not subject to related implementation planning.

Actions are cataloged and referenced to each specific waterbody. It might be prudent to review such actions suggested by the work plan for the waterbody(s) of your specific concern.

You might make comment on enforceability of actions, time period to implementation, likelyhood of implementation given Regional Board staffing and time lines.

This action needs to be reviewed and commented on - by Nov 28th. I have fallen behind. I will try and get something out - early next week.

This plan is 243 pages long. Links are noticed - below.

Alan Levine

To: Interested Parties for Sediment TMDL Implementation Issues:

The Work Plan to Control Excess Sediment in Sediment-Impaired Watersheds (the Work Plan) is now available for public review.

If possible, your comments are requested by Wednesday, November 28, 2007. On December 6, 2007, the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board will consider Resolution No. R1-2007-0095, directing staff to execute the sediment control tasks described in the Work Plan. Click here for the agenda for the December 6th Board Meeting in Eureka.

If you have any questions or comments on the Work Plan, please contact me at 707-576-2650 or rfitzgerald@waterboards.ca.gov.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Fitzgerald
Environmental Scientist

North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board
5550 Skylane Boulevard, Suite A
Santa Rosa, California 95404
707-576-2650
fax 523-0135
rfitzgerald@waterboards.ca.gov
www.waterboards.ca.gov/northcoast

The Perfect Drought: Water Shortages Demand Efficiency and New Thinking

Editorial from the Salt Lake Tribune - 11/5/07

Water. Without it, there is no life.

That’s not news in the arid West. What is news is that the dual pressures of global warming and population growth are placing severe stress on fresh water supplies across the United States. Both the Southwest and the Southeast are enduring droughts.

If Americans do not get much smarter about how we use fresh water - and fast - the nation could face perpetual thirst that, in turn, could cause economic and population dislocation.

Don’t buy that? Check out the Oct. 21 issue of The New York Times Magazine. The cover story, titled “The Perfect Drought,” by Jon Gertner, is an excellent primer on the West’s water dilemma.

Utahns will be familiar with the information there about our dependence on the declining Rocky Mountain snowpack, the effect of drier winters on the stream flows in the Colorado River, the bathtub rings in Lake Powell and Lake Mead, the battle over water in Snake Valley as Las Vegas plans to tap groundwater in east central Nevada and pipe it south.

What they may not know, however, is that in addition to conserving fresh water by tearing out lawns and replacing them with drought-resistant plants and installing low-flow toilets, we also need to rethink how we use potable water. It doesn’t make much sense to pour it on our yards and flush it down our toilets. We could use recycled water for that.

We also must rethink allocating huge quantities of water to farming when land-use patterns in the urban West have changed so drastically.

If you’re thinking that we can outflank climate change by building more dams on places like the Bear River, you might want to think again. Storing water in surface reservoirs may not be as efficient as storing it underground, where evaporation can’t steal it.

In any case, it’s going to require a host of different strategies for Utah to feed and water its growing population, and we’re going to have to think outside the Bureau of Reclamation’s 20th-century toolbox to get the job done.

To this end, Congressman Jim Matheson has introduced a bill instructing the Environmental Protection Agency to work with nongovernmental agencies on research to increase water use efficiency and conservation.

That’s only a drop in the bucket, but it’s a start.

Watershed Training Opportunity - Nov. 30-Dec. 3

Hi Watershed Folks,

I just wanted to remind you all to let your friends know about this upcoming training. Please forward this far and wide as you see fit.

The OAEC WATER Institute’s 8th annual Basins Of Relations Training from Nov. 30th to Dec. 3rd.

For more information I have attached a flyer on the training.

You can also go to our website page at www.oaecwater.org/training for more info and see a sample syllabus, that will give you an idea of the flow of the 4 days during the training, although the specific speakers and topics are subject to change.

Heck - $200 bucks for 4 days at OAEC with three meals a day of fresh local organic food, fun, hot tub and sauna alone is worth it and then add in all the learning - an amazing cast of presenters and the all star cast of attendees and whose says that practicing community based watershed restoration isn’t exciting, fun and restorative??

I also wanted to let folks know about my ‘Hot-off-the-Presses’ 20 page publication called: Basins of Relations: A Citizen’s Guide to Protecting and Restoring Our Watersheds.

See more on the following web page:
www.oaecwater.org/education/bor-publication

To buy a copy for $5, call the WATER Institute at (707) 874-1557 ext. 218 or email our Associate Director Kate Lundquist at kate@oaec.org.

Hope to see some of you there and/or meet your fellow watershed neighbors and friends!!

Will Work for Water,
Brock

Brock Dolman
WATER Institute Director
Occidental Arts and Ecology Center
15290 Coleman Valley Road
Occidental, CA 95465
707-874-1557 x 206
Brock@oaec.org
www.oaecwater.org
www.oaec.org

Anomaly in SCWA’s Water Table?

Dear folks -

As we crunch the Conservation numbers as supplied, several questions come up:

1 - Were the numbers provided for the actual period of conservation that was mandated by SWRCB, ie, July 1 thru Oct. 28, 2007?  Or were they compiled from January 1, 2007.  Likewise, was the 2004 comparison year data also for Jan 1 - Oct 28, 2004, or only during the July 1 - Oct. 28, 2004 period?  The table is unclear on this. The numbers suggest that the chart does cover the July thru Oct periods, but it is not clear.  See #2:

2 - There is a serious anomaly in the Russian River diversion statistics versus the letter that was sent by the WAC to the Bd of Supervisors/Directors SCWA in August, which in part states:

“Term 13 of the Water Board’s order requires the Agency to reduce diversions from the Russian River by 15% during the months of July through October 2007, as compared to the Agency’s diversions during the same period in 2004. The Agency diverted 26,475 acre-feet during July through October 2004, and to comply with the Water Board order, the Agency’s transmission system is restricted to diverting 22,503 acre-feet during July through October 2007. The water contractors have initiated several steps to assist the Agency in accomplishing this reduction, and as of July 30, 2007, Russian River diversions have been reduced by 16.6%.  …..”

“I am writing this to convey the Water Advisory Committee’s unanimous decision to
voluntarily undertake to restrict the water contractors’ collective take from the Agency’s
transmission system to be no more than 22,503 acre-feet during July through October 2007 to assist the Agency in meeting Term 13 of the Water Board’s order.”

HOWEVER, the Table of water use provided this week shows these two Russian River diversion numbers as:

- July? thru Oct. 2004:  28,013 af
- July? thru Oct. 2007:  23,574 af

Huh??

David

Valley’s Groundwater Plan OK’d by Two Agencies

By Sandi Hansen INDEX-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

In what is being described as the first ever joint-agencies project studying groundwater in Sonoma Valley, the boards of directors of both the Sonoma County Water Agency and the Valley of the Moon Water District formally approved the Groundwater Management Plan Tuesday at their respective meetings. The City of Sonoma is expected to approve it shortly.

The plan, more than a year in the making, was developed by the 20-member voluntary Sonoma Valley Basin Advisory Panel whose makeup includes representatives from agriculture and other businesses, rural and urban water users and environmental, local, county and state water agencies. Its intent is to provide a blueprint for managing Sonoma Valley’s groundwater resources far into the future while maintaining local control over groundwater issues and motivating stakeholders to implement major conservation and water recycling efforts.

According to the plan’s executive summary, Sonoma Valley relies on groundwater and imported water to meet domestic, agricultural and urban demands. Based on a 2006 United States Geological Survey, in 2000 more than half the water demand in the Valley was met by groundwater (57 percent), followed by imported water (36 percent), with the remaining demand met from recycled water (7 percent).

The largest use of groundwater in 2000 was for irrigating (72 percent, mostly for grapes), followed by rural domestic use (19 percent) and urban demand was the third largest (9 percent). After much studying and discussion of these and numerous other statistics, maps, models and projections during 13 meetings since 2006, the Basin Advisory Panel came to a consensus on the objectives and goals of the groundwater plan including: maintaining groundwater elevations, improving conservation, protecting and enhancing recharge areas, managing groundwater in conjunction with other water sources, protecting groundwater quality including minimizing saline intrusion, improving the groundwater database through increased voluntary well monitoring and managing groundwater with local control. Tuesday morning, the Sonoma County Water Agency board of directors, who are also the Sonoma County Supervisors, enthusiastically approved the massive and complex plan which has the water agency as the lead agency partnering with the Valley of the Moon Water District, the City of Sonoma and the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District.

First District Supervisor Valerie Brown, a staunch supporter of the groundwater plan, said she was surprised at the enthusiasm shown by the water agency boardmembers in approving the plan. “I’ve never seen Mike Reilly salivating as much as he was,” Brown said. Reilly represents the Santa Rosa plain, and the City of Santa Rosa soon will be developing its own plan, which Brown said she expects will be modeled after Sonoma Valley’s. “We’re kind of on the front edge looking at water resources and long-term water availability,” she said. “We’re on the cutting edge and understanding that what is happening here in the Valley is so important and can be used as a model for the rest of California,” she added.

Prior to the Valley of the Moon Water District’s regular board meeting Tuesday night, a joint meeting of the water district directors and the Sonoma City Council was held to present the groundwater plan and receive public input.

Also attending were Basin Advisory Panel members and consultants, water agency representatives, and a few interested citizens who viewed a PowerPoint presentation, produced by the water agency, on the yearlong development of the Groundwater Management Plan. Bill Keene and Jay Jasperse, both water agency staff and very involved in the plan’s development, outlined the steps taken to arrive at the final draft.

“This collaborative effort has been made possible by a really diverse group of people and it has been a pleasure to work with them,” Keene said.

The next phase in the massive project is working toward implementation of the voluntary groundwater plan’s recommendations, including securing government funding, no easy task according to BAP president and water boardmember Mark Bramfitt. “We’ve got some huge challenges ahead, but it feels good to have the framework. I think we have the constituency in the Valley, the question is how we get there,” Bramfitt said. “I hope we can get state-grant funding. We know what we need to do, now it’s how we’re going to get there,” Bramfitt added.

Ed Kenny, water board president, said in the 15 years he’s been a director of the district, this is the first time he’s ever seen a joint meeting with the Sonoma City Council and collaborating on a joint venture. Turning to the councilmembers, Kenny said, “You broke the ice.”

SCWA Water Contractor Statistics - July through October

(data in acre feet except no. of services)
RR=Russian River, Local=wells, RW=Reused Water

 
2004
 
RR
Local
RW
Total
Services
Santa Rosa
10, 303
0
160
10,463
48,665
Petaluma
4,876
0
0
4,876
18,869
North Marin
4,127
734
0
4,861
19,117
Rohnert Park
1,856
828
712
3,396
42,376
VOMWD
1,270
240
0
1,510
6,771
Sonoma
1,013
17
0
1,030
4,050
Cotati
466
545
0
520
2,370
Windsor
2,028
13
535
2,576
8,372
MMWD
2,074
10,655
355
13,084
59,000
Total
28,013
12,541
1,762
42,316
n/a
 
2007 (through 10/28/07)
 
RR
Local
RW
Total
Services
Santa Rosa
9,050
830
119
9,999
50,629
Petaluma
3,788
209
339
4,336
19,220
North Marin
3,110
1.311
177
4,528
20,325
Rohnert Park
1,518
587
?
2,105
42,959
VOMWD
1,131
251
0
1,382
6,880
Sonoma
925
64
0
989
4,294
Cotati
306
187
0
493
2,548
Windsor
1,928
0
506
2,434
9,126
MMWD
1,818
10,086
353
12,257
59,459
Total
23,574
13,525 1,434 38,533
n/a

All Data Through October 2007
Estimate
Population

Date 11/13/07

Environmental Leadership: Today’s Global Challenges

In case this is of interest to you or to folks you know.

Have a grand Day of the Dead, remembering our wise elders (not that I’m so young, but as they say I’m still ‘above the grass’).
Rue

Join us for a talk on Environmental Leadership: Finding Solutions to Today’s Global Challenges

by Brian Rosborough, founder of Earthwatch
on Thursday, November 15 at 7 pm
Merlo Theater, Wells Fargo Center for the Arts

This event is free and open to the public thanks to the Wendt Family International Speaker Series at Sonoma Academy.

Earthwatch Institute is an international non-profit organization that brings science to life for people concerned about the Earth’s future. Earthwatch supports scientific field research by offering volunteers the opportunity to join research teams around the world and currently supports 130 projects annually searching for solutions to sustainability, global warming, habitat destruction, loss of biodiversity and public health issues, among others.

Brian Rosborough founded Earthwatch Institute in 1971 and served as its Chairman and CEO ever since. He has organized and funded more than 2500 research expeditions for scientists in 100 countries. Rosborough also serves on various civic and educational boards of directors related to the environment, including the Rocky Mountain Institute, Cape Cod National Seashore, International Development Enterprises, Digital Nations, the United Nations Information and Communications Technologies Task Force and The Media Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Fittingly, Rosborogh resides in Concord, MA ‹ only a mile from Walden Pond.

Sonoma Academy, 50 Mark West Springs Road, Santa Rosa, CA 707.545.1770
www.sonomaacademy.org