Help Stop Fracking in California

It’s time to halt fracking in California, and current legislation is getting us one step closer to that goal.

Fracking is a dangerous, rapidly spreading oil and gas extraction technique that threatens our water, air, wildlife, climate and public health. Despite the grave risks, California oil and gas regulators don’t require companies to report when or where they are fracking wells — or what toxic chemicals they use.

Despite intense pressure from the oil industry, three bills seeking a moratorium on fracking in California already passed the Assembly Natural Resources Committee. But the battle is far from over — these bills are now headed to the Assembly Appropriations Committee for a vote.

Please take action now: Call Speaker John Perez and Appropriations Committee Chair Mike Gatto. Ask them to protect California from a fracking disaster by supporting legislation to place a moratorium on fracking in California.

Speaker John Perez: (916) 319-2053
Appropriations Chair Mike Gatto: (916) 319-2043

Sample Script:

I strongly support A.B. 1301, 649 and 1323, which place a moratorium on fracking in California. I strongly oppose A.B. 7, which allows fracking to continue in our state and would keep the chemicals used in fracking shrouded in secrecy.

Other states have enacted bans or moratoriums on fracking. California should do the same. Thank you for your leadership in this important effort to protect our air, water, wildlife, climate and communities from the dangers of fracking.

Then use the list below to see if your representative is on the Appropriations Committee. Call and ask them to support a moratorium on fracking.

Posted in Drinking Water, Environmental Impacts, Fracking, Groundwater Impacts, Water Conservation Issue, Watershed Related Concerns | Leave a comment

Ban Fracking Event in San Francisco, May 30, Noon

CALIFORNIANS AGAINST FRACKING COALITION LAUNCH

Help make history with the Center when we join in launching Californians Against Fracking, a statewide coalition working to ban fracking in California.

Fracking poses a direct and immediate threat to California’s drinking water, air, food, health, wildlife, climate and economy. While the state prides itself on being a leader in the fight against climate change, oil companies are gearing up to frack the estimated 15 billion barrels of oil in the Monterey Shale. This area is home to some of the state’s most productive farmland, critical water sources, important wildlife habitat and communities from the Salinas Valley to the Los Angeles Basin.

More than 60 labor groups, farmers, public health professionals, environmental and environmental justice organizations and local residents will come together to call for a ban in California on the dirty and dangerous practice of fracking.

We’ll take our message directly to Governor Jerry Brown as we deliver tens of thousands of signatures on petitions to ban fracking at rallies in front of the his offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco.

RSVP using the form below.

Event location: San Francisco

Governor Jerry Brown’s Office
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102

Register for this event at:

http://action.biologicaldiversity.org/p/salsa/event/common/public/?event_KEY=80287

Posted in Drinking Water, Environmental Impacts, Fracking, Groundwater Impacts, Watershed Related Concerns | Leave a comment

GM Crops and Water – A Recipe for Disaster

Genetically modified foods are a threat to our dwindling water supplies; they are less water-efficient and contaminate fresh water

GMO canola in the wild, what will Monsanto do?

Dr Eva Sirinathsinghji
Institute of Science in Society, May 7, 2013
Source: i-sis.org.uk

Genetically Modified (GM) crops are widely recognised for their potential to damage both human health and the environment. Evidence is now accumulating of the contamination of streams, rivers, rain, as well as groundwater with GM-associated chemicals including Monsanto’s glyphosate-based herbicide, while genetic elements such as antibiotic resistant genes are emerging in water-borne microbes. Further, GM crops have been shown to be less water efficient, corroborating farmer’s reports of failing GM crops during droughts. Industrial farming in general has been shown to be ill-adapted to extreme weather events such as hurricanes as well as droughts; and GM crops are not expected to do any better.

Cultivation of GM crops is a serious threat to food security particularly as global water supply is depleting (see [1] World Water Supply in Jeopardy, SiS 56) and already heavily polluted; with elicit and licit drugs (see [2] Pharmaceutical Cocktails Anyone?, SiS 56, [3] Illicit Drugs in Drinking Water ), in addition to pathogens, arsenic, fluoride, chemical fertilizers, pesticides, industrial waste products, landfill leaks, and gasoline etc. [4] Water Not Fit to Drink, SiS 57).

Continue reading

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Water Conservation Issue | 1 Comment

Farmers work to protect grapes, river levels

Steve Adler, April 24, 2013

Winegrape growers within the Russian River watershed came through the first night of freezing temperatures with flying colors last week, as their sprinkler diversions for frost protection of vulnerable spring vine growth resulted in very little drop in river flow levels.

Farmers work to protect grapes, river levels

The issue involves farmers in Mendocino and Sonoma counties, who occasionally use sprinkler systems to protect grapes and pears from frost, and state and federal regulators who say the frost-protection measures pull too much water from the Russian River and its tributaries, thereby endangering protected salmon and steelhead.

“We had our first real frost event so far this year, and while it was not a large-magnitude event, it was an awesome first opportunity for us to really check everything that we put in place. I was super thrilled with the outcome,” said Sean White, manager of the Russian River Flood Control District in Mendocino County.

Continue reading

Posted in Agriculture Impacts, Environmental Impacts, Vineyards | Comments Off

Census will Guide and Improve Water Sustainability Efforts

Contact: Jessica Kershaw (DOI), Jon Campbell (USGS), 04/03/2013

WASHINGTON, DC – Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today released a report to Congress on the progress of the National Water Census, which is being developed at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to help the nation address its critical water needs.

“This update to the National Water Census—the first since 1978—will give the nation critical new information about the availability and use of America’s freshwater resources,” said Salazar. “Development of the new state-of-the-art National Water Census forms a vital component of the Department of the Interior’s overall strategy to help ensure sustainable water resources for the United States. Similar to the need for the U.S. population census to make informed societal decisions, resource managers need the water census to support wise policy and decision-making on water matters.”

Continue reading

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Vineyards | 1 Comment

Actions on Anti-fracking in Monterrey

Dear Activists and Stewards of our land,
Whatever your skills and interests are, there is some way to put them to use for the earth.  Thank you for caring about this planet and wanting to use your energy for saving the land you love.

This is a very important time for the anti fracking movement in California, and there are various groups working on this.  Rising Tide Monterey Bay may be the most local to you, focused on the Monterey Shale, and perhaps best able to guide you to Monterey specific resources.

https://www.facebook.com/RisingTideMontereyBay?fref=pb&hc_location=profile_browser

They’re having a camp out in Monterey County, at Williams Hill Recreation Area & Campground, May 10th, with teach ins on Saturday about fracking and direct action -

https://www.facebook.com/events/100171366853809/

As you probably know, there are various angles to work from … some groups focus more on legislative, others more on direct action.  I believe both are important.  This is also a key time for legislative pressure in California, as earlier this week three moratorium bills passed the Assembly Natural Resources Committee.  This is fantastic, and happened only because of people calling and writing the Committee members, but it’s just the first hurdle.  The bills now need to go to the Appropriations Committee, which will be challenging.  There’s a great list serve, Unfrack California, with news, discussions, strategy, and important info for targeting legislators … Would you like to be added to that list?  Let me know if you’d like me to give your email to the moderator.  

A few other resources you may be interested in -

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/campaigns/california_fracking/

http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/take-action/in-your-community/pacific-region/california/

(Both groups are doing great work on this … their action alerts, petitions, and signing up for their mailing lists are always good ways to help.)

https://www.facebook.com/StopFrackingLosAngeles – Great FB page, informative articles, photos, events, action alerts.   (“Stop Fracking Los Angeles” is an old name that stuck as the FB address, the current name is Stop Fracking California State and the focus is California wide, not just LA.)

cate@greendwellings.com  – Contact for 350.org Bay Area sub group on fracking.

http://eastcountymagazine.org/node/13135  – Article about current legislative good news and next steps.   Link to petition at bottom of article – please sign.)

http://gov.ca.gov/m_contact.php - Contact info for Governor Jerry Brown.  It would take a lot of pressure for him to get behind a ban on fracking, but it’s possible with enough people getting involved.  Call / write and ask him to ban fracking in California.

And of course, there’s always just talking with people as you go about life, helping them see through the deception of the oil industry.  The most common talking point they use is “we’ve been fracking for over 60 years … “  “Fracking” was invented by Halliburton in the 1940′s, so this statement is technically true.  It’s also an example of how they twist the truth and intentionally mislead, because the methods of fracking in use today – especially in the case of the Monterey Shale which has very tight, hard to access oil – are way more intense in terms of pressure, water usage, horizontal drilling, and far more dangerous than the fracking that has gone on for decades. The media often takes the industry quote of “the past 60 years” at face value, so this is an important thing to address, especially when talking with people near where fracking may happen.

http://www.globalexchange.org/blogs/peopletopeople/2013/04/04/corporate-executives-say-fracking-is-good-for-you-do-you-trust-them/ - Good link to more info on the issue, and Shannon Biggs from Global Exchange helps communities work at the local level to keep out fracking.

Also, educating about solutions … they say we need to frack for domestic energy, yet a lot of our energy is intended for export.  One can agree that we shouldn’t be importing oil from Saudi Arabia and also be against destructive energy extractions here.  The links at the bottom of my email are about the potential of renewables, and the first link in bold is a blueprint for NY State to be powered entirely by wind, water and sunlight.  That team of researchers is working on a blueprint for a renewable CA next, followed by the other 50 states.  : )  !!
This is enough info for now, but feel free to contact me if you have any questions or anything you’d like to share.
Thanks so much,
Ellen Osuna
“If the sight of the blue skies fills you with joy, if a blade of grass
springing up in the fields has power to move you, if the simple things of
nature have a message that you understand, rejoice, for your soul is alive.”
- Eleonora Duse
Posted in Drinking Water, Environmental Impacts, Fracking, Waste Discharge Pollution, Water Conservation Issue, Watershed Related Concerns | Comments Off

California court ruling gives hope to foes of fracking

By Rory Carroll and Braden Reddall
SAN FRANCISCO | Tue Apr 9, 2013 8:18pm EDT

(Reuters) – A court ruling that the U.S. government must consider the environmental impact of “fracking” on federal lands leased to oil companies offers opponents of the technique a useful weapon in the fierce public debate in California and other parts of the country.

hope to foes of fracking

In a regulatory setback for hydraulic fracturing on public lands, a federal magistrate judge in San Jose, California, on Monday ruled that the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) failed to analyze its impact on 2,500 acres in Monterey County.

While energy lawyers were skeptical about the ruling’s long-term impact, it was hailed as a victory for environmentalists trying to stop fracking in the state due to concerns about its groundwater impact and the potential for increased fossil fuels output contributing to climate change.

The ruling could even inspire environmental groups to sue the BLM in other states as oil companies accelerate their leasing of federal lands for fracking, said Brendan Cummings, a lawyer for the Center for Biological Diversity.

“While the ruling has most direct impact on public lands in California, it also sets an important legal and policy precedent that federal and state agencies around the country would be wise to heed,” said Cummings, whose group brought the suit with the Sierra Club.

Celia Boddington, a spokeswoman for the BLM, said: “We are evaluating the ruling.”

Continue reading

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Fracking, Groundwater Impacts | Comments Off

Pennsylvania Court Deals Blow to Secrecy-Obsessed Fracking Industry: Corporations Not The Same As Persons With Privacy Rights

April 11, 2013

This article was published in partnership withGlobalPossibilities.org [3].

A Pennsylvania judge in the heart of the Keystone State’s fracking belt has issued a forceful and precedent-setting decision holding that there is no corporate right to privacy under that state’s constitution, giving citizens and journalists a powerful tool to understand the health and environmental impacts of natural gas drilling in their communities.

“Whether a right of privacy for businesses exists within the prenumbral rights of Pennsylvania’s constitution is a matter of first impression,” wrote Washington County Court of Common Pleas Judge Debbie O’Dell Seneca late last month. “It does not.”

Judge O’Dell Seneca’s ruling comes in an ongoing case where several newspapers sued to unseal a confidential settlement where major fracking corporations paid $750,000 to a family that claimed the gas drilling had contaminated their water and harmed their health. The Court ordered that settlement unsealed, enabling the papers, environmentalists and community rights advocates to examine the health issues and causes.

“The ruling represents the first crack in the judicial armor that has been so meticulously welded together by major corporations,” said Thomas Linzey, executive director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund [4], which has helped 150 communities in eight states adopt Community Bill of Rights to limit corporate powers. “It affirms what many communities already know, that change only occurs when people begin to openly question and challenge legal doctrines that have been treated as sacred by most lawyers and judges.”

Continue reading

Posted in Environmental Impacts, Fracking, Groundwater Impacts | Comments Off

CRWFS Releases New Report on Water: From Storage to Retention

CRWFS Releases New Report on Water: From Storage to Retention

November 2012

On November 13, 2012, the California Roundtable on Water and Food Supply released its latest report, From Storage to Retention: Expanding California’s Options for Meeting Its Water Needs. The report builds on earlier work focused on agricultural water stewardship, and argues for an expansion of approaches to storing water that increase supply reliability for specialty crop agricultural production and other beneficial uses while protecting ecosystem health. Management approaches must support a broad range of options, including ecologically sound large-scale reservoirs, a patchwork of on-farm ponds, expanded soil capacity to retain water, and improvements in groundwater recharge, among others. The report highlights both a conceptual shift in water management that it argues is a necessary underpinning of effective water storage, and recommends a set of priority actions that constitute high-leverage opportunities to improve California’s water storage capacity and management. The Roundtable is grateful to the USDA Specialty Crop Block Grant Program, administered by the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and Gaia Fund for their support.

For full report click here. PDF (1.8 MB)

Posted in Agriculture Impacts, Drinking Water, Environmental Impacts, Groundwater Impacts, Lakes and Resevoirs Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts | Comments Off

Update on the National Water Census by USGS

April 4, 2013

WASHINGTON, DC – Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar today released a report to Congress on the progress of the National Water Census, which is being developed at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to help the nation address its critical water needs.

“This update to the National Water Census—the first since 1978—will give the nation critical new information about the availability and use of America’s freshwater resources,” said Salazar. “Development of the new state-of-the-art National Water Census forms a vital component of the Department of the Interior’s overall strategy to help ensure sustainable water resources for the United States. Similar to the need for the U.S. population census to make informed societal decisions, resource managers need the water census to support wise policy and decision-making on water matters.”

As competition for water grows—for irrigation of crops, for use by cities and communities, for energy production, and for the environment—the need for the National Water Census and related information and tools to aid water resource managers also grows. The Water Census will assist water and resource managers in understanding and quantifying water supply and demand, and will support more sustainable management of water resources.

“It’s true in other fields and no less so for water: you can’t manage what you don’t measure,” said Anne Castle, Interior’s Assistant Secretary for Water and Science. “The Water Census will quantify water supply and demand consistently across the entire country, fill in gaps in existing data, and make that information available to anyone who needs it—and that represents a huge step forward on the path toward water sustainability.”

The report released today describes the “water budget” approach being taken to assess water availability for the nation. Water budgets account for the inputs to, outputs from, and changes in the amount of water in the various components of the water cycle. They are the hydrologic equivalent of the deposits to, withdrawals from, and changes in the balance in a checking account and provide the hydrologic foundation for analysis of water availability.

USGS is initially focusing production of the Water Census on areas with significant competition for water availability and existing or emerging conflicts over water supply, such as the Delaware, Colorado, and Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basins. Increasing populations, more volatile stream flows, energy development and municipal demands, and the uncertain effects of a changing climate amplify the need for an improved understanding of water use and water availability in these crucial watersheds. The Water Census (like our national population Census) is an ongoing effort that will provide information for current and future decision makers. USGS will continually be updating it, adding to it, and improving the accuracy of the various water budget components.

The Water Census is a component of the Department of the Interior’s WaterSMART initiative (Sustain and Manage America’s Resources for Tomorrow), and fulfills a requirement under the Secure Water Act, part of the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act of 2009. Through WaterSMART, the Department is working to secure and stretch water supplies for use by existing and future generations to benefit people, the economy, and the environment, and to identify adaptive measures needed to address climate change and future demands. The report, Progress Toward Establishing a National Assessment of Water Availability and Use, is available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circular/1384.

Contact: Jessica Kershaw (DOI), 202-208-6416
Jon Campbell (USGS), 703-648-4180

Posted in Agriculture Impacts, Drinking Water, Groundwater Impacts, Lakes and Resevoirs Impacts, Streams and Wetlands Impacts | Comments Off